The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed Writ Petition No.5978 of 2018 as infructuous because the underlying matter was compromised before the Lok Adalat on 11.12.2023.
The Writ Petition was dismissed as infructuous. The miscellaneous petitions pending therein stood closed. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
If 1 4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 5978 OF 2018
Between:
Kappareddy Praveen Kumar, S/o Venkayya, Age 31 years, Occ. Business, R/o Flat No. A2, Pardhivi Residency, Opp.Medha Junior college. Ramavarapadu, Vijayawada, Krishna District
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Mandamus or any other appropriate orders or orders by declaring the inaction of the 2"'^ respondent in not considering the representation dated 22-01-2018 in seeking appropriate enquiry against the respondent No 5 to 8 in involving the civil and matrimonial matter of the petitioner and respondent no 9 which are pending consideration before
concerned courts and with the influence of the respondentno10to13and acting on their favour and harassing the petitioner and directing him to settle the matter with the respondent no 9, and registeringtwo crimes without making proper enquiry and further paper statement of the respondent no 3 in supporting the respondent no 5 to 8 which is illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and violation of fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent no 2 to consider the representation dated 22.01.2018 and make an enquiry against respondent no 5 to 8 in interfering with Matrimonial matter between the petitioner and respondent no 9.
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the regular activities of the Petitioner pending matrimonial matters between the petitioner and the respondent no 9 pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI. DASAKA MURALI KRISHNA
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 to 13 : NONE APPEARED.
The Court made the following Order:
y
APHC010137022018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3368]
THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 5978/2018
Between:
Kappareddy Praveen Kumar ...PETITIONER
AND
State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.DASAKA MURALI KRISHNA
Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GFl^ FOR HOME(AP)
The Court made the following order:
This Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitutionof
India is filed for the following relief;
“to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the and 3!'^ respondent failed in their statutory duty to investigate the crime pursuant to FIR No. 14 of 2018 dated 14.02.2018 on the file of PS Parchuru Prakasham District is illegal, arbitrary and violativeof Article 14 and Article 12 of the Constitution of India
2
and violative of Principles of natural justice and pass
such...”
- None appeared for the petitioner.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, ifany, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
To
//TRUE COPY//
erf/ A VENUGOPALA RAO assistant registrar /1^ SECTION OFFICER
3. Three CD Copies
DPBR
HIGH COURT
DATED:05/09/2024
ORDER
WP.No.5978 of 2018
o<br>I 7 MAR 2025
^ . Current Section
DISMISSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition under Article 227/226 seeking direction for inquiry into alleged interference in matrimonial matters should be allowed.
Kappareddy Praveen Kumar
State of Andhra Pradesh
B V L N Chakravarti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
