VadIa Ravindra, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
This one-line order dismisses a writ petition at the stage of withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh petition. It records no legal proposition or substantive decision.
This one-line order dismisses a writ petition at the stage of withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh petition. It records no legal proposition or substantive decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION No.5428 of 2024
VadIa Ravindra, S/o. Vadla Dhanunjaya Achari, Aged about 33 years, Occ: Student, R/o. H.No.3-9, Vadlageri, Gondegandla, Peddamarriveedu (PO), Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh - 518 463.
…Petitioner
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Animal Husbandary Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati and seven others.
…Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner : Sri Y. Balaji Counsel for respondents : GP for Services-I, GP for Services-IV
ORDER
Sri Y. Balaji learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file fresh writ petition in view of the subsequent developments.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn giving liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous petitions shall stand closed.
_____________________ SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J
Date: 02.07.2024 KAS
Page 2 of 2
SRS, J W.P.No.5428 of 2024
94
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION No.5428 of 2024
Date: 02.07.2024
KAS
Vadla Ravindra
The State of Andhra Pradesh
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court