Muchumarri Sudhakar Reddy, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged an order as illegal. Respondent submitted intervening fresh order was passed, causing the cause to cease to subsist. Writ petition closed.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition is closed. No order as to costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION No.5270 of 2024
Muchumarri Sudhakar Reddy, aged about 60 years, S/o. Late M. Veera Reddy, R/o. D.No.1/80, Beechuvaripalle Village, Valluru Mandal, YSR Kadapa District.
…Petitioner
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District and three others.
…Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner : Sri K. Venkatesh Counsel for respondents : GP for Revenue
ORDER
The above writ petition is filed impugning the order vide Ref.No.B/261/2023 dated 27.01.2024, issued by the 4th respondent as illegal and arbitrary.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Muchumarri Sudhakar Reddy
- respondent
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Coram
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Andhra Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/5270/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court