The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed Writ Petition No. 5084 of 2018 for non-prosecution, as the petitioner filed no representation on the scheduled dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
TUESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 5084 OF 2018
Between:
Sriram Radhakrishna, S/o S.Kesav Rao, Aged 39 years, occ. Private Service, R/o 16-2, New Ramnagar Colony, Alwal, Secunderabad ...PETITIONER
AND
Bunk, R/o 0pp. Girls High School, Railway Station Road Vetapalem Village 86 Mandal.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction more particularly in the nature of the writ of mandamus duly declaring the in action of the respondents 2 to 4 in removing the illegal encroachments i n spite of finding of the 4th respondent in his report dated 03.08.2005, as dereliction in their duty. arbitrary, and against the principles of natural justice, and consequently direct the respondents to remove the encroachments of 5th respondenton the northern side of the Station Road, southern side of house No. 16-2, Sy
^ 9 No.in 215/5B, Vetapalem Village and Mandal, Prakasam District, in the interest of justice. ' 4. .. V lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to remove the encroachments of 5th respondent on the northern side of the Station Road, southern side of house NO. 16-2, Sy No.in 215/5B, Vetapalem Village and Mandal, Prakasam District, in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI. P RAMA SHARANA SHARMA Counsel for the Respondents No.1,2,3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI. G. VENKATAREDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.5:SRI. M. CHALAPATHI RAO The Court made the following: ORDER
[3329 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 5084 OF 2018
Between;
• • • PETITIONER! S)
AND
...RESPONDENTS
This Court made the following:
On 08.02.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the matter was posted totoday under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today alsothereis no representation on behalf of the petitioner. This
indicates that the petitioner herein has no interest in prosecuting the Writ Petition.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending
shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- U. SRIDEV! ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Ik SECTION OFFICER
To,
nm
HIGH COURT * DATED: 13/02/2024
ORDER
WP.No.5084 of 2018
0
/a: m
o 1 7 AUG 202'! Oil}}
. Current Section ^ ^
>, .... .wv.^ <"•*
DISMISSING THE WP FOR
NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
Sriram Radhakrishna
The State of Andhra Pradesh
The District Collector, Prakasam District, Ongole
The Mandal Revenue Officer, Vetapalem, Prakasam District
The Grampanchayat Secretary, Grampanchcyat, Vetapalem, Prakasham District
Kondru Venkayamma
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
