Writ petition challenging non-issuance of transit permits for timber. The Court noted that respondents had complied with earlier interim directions. Accordingly, the petition was closed without costs.
Writ Petition closed; no further orders; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVAT
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA'R^JASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 4963 OF 201^
Between:
...Petitioners
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may
i
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WVMP. NO: 1664 OF 20151
...Petitioners
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate interim orders passed 10.03.2015 in W.P.M.P. No. 6605
of 2015 in W.P.No. 4963 of 201 by this Hon'ble Courttodismissthewrit petition in the interest of the Justice.
I.A. NO: 2 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 6605 OF 20151
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to issue transit permits in Form-ll for transportation of the timber from the 1st petitionersaw mill under the A.P.Forest Produce Transit Rules, 1970 in the interest of justice,
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI. K VENKATESH
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR FORESTS
The Court made the following order:
APHC010291742015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
[3330]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 4963/2015
Between:
Sri Sai Saw Mill & Timber Depot, and Others
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By Its PrI ...RESPONDENT(S)
Secretary and Others
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.KVENKATESH
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR FORESTS (AP)
2
The Court made the following order:-
Aggrieved by the action of the 3'^^ respondent in not issuing transit permits in Form-ll to the petitioner, the present writ petition is filed.
- This Court vide docket order dated 10.03.2015 directed the respondents to issue transit permits according to rules, pending consideration of the renewal application.
- Now, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that interim order granted earlier would suffice. As the respondents have complied with the interim orders, no further orders are required.
- Basing upon the submission, the present Writ Petitionisclosed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any shall stand closed.
To,
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- M PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER
GSC
HIGH COURT DATED:03/12/2024
ORDER
WP.No.4963 of 2015
CLOSING OF THE WP
WITHOUT COSTS
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the refusal to issue transit permits in Form-II was illegal and arbitrary?
Whether further directions are required when interim orders have been complied with?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Sri Sai Saw Mill & Timber Depot
S. Narayana Reddy
State of Andhra Pradesh
Principal Chief Conservator of Forests
Divisional Forest Officer
Forest Range Officer
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
