Writ petition seeking mandamus to police to register a crime over unlevelled quarry left-over pits was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner repeatedly failed to appear and showed no interest in pursuing the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3310]
IN THE HIQH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiption)
THURSDAY. THE FIFTEENTH PAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 4783 OF 2015
Between:
Smt. M.Vijaya, W/o M.Nageswara Rao Aged about 44 years, Houee wife Rio Plot No. 14, D.No. 67-2-7/1, Subbarao Nagar, Rajahmundry Rural, East Godavari District.
...Petitioner.
AND
'■vr
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the. affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents 3 and 4 in failing to take action by registering the Crime pursuant to the complaint given by the 5 th respondent in Letter No. 7111/01/20Q4 dated 17-1-2014 and Letter dated 13-12-2013 is illegal,
%
arbitrary for not leveling the quarry left over pits to prevent untoward incident covering Sy.Nos. 67/4, 68/3 and 68/4 and 147/1C,163 » 164, 165, 166 and 167/1 & 2 and 168 of Ramdaspet, Simhachala Nagar, within the limits^^f Municipal Corporation of Rajahmudry, East Godavari District and I' .j ! / consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to take appropriate action for I v initiating to register the complaint dated 17-1-2014 and 13-12-2013. .'h
J.A,.Nd: 1 OF 2015rWPMP. NO: 6348 OF 201
Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.4 to initiate steps th by registering the complaint submitted by the 5 respondent dated 17-12014 and 13-12-2013 for not leveling the quarry left over pits to prevent untoward incident covering Sy.Nos. 67/4, 68/3 and 68/4 and 147/1C j 163 7 164, 165, 166 and 167/1 & 2 and 168 of Ramdaspet, Simhachala Nagar : within the limits of Municipal Corporation of Rajahmudry j East Godavari District.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI. SRINIVAS KAPATIA
Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
%
[ 3310 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 4783 OF 2015
Between:
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
■ ■ ■ RESPONPENTS
\
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents 3 and 4 in failing to take action by registering the Crime pursuant to the complaint given by the 5th respondent in Letter No.. 7111/01/2004 dated 17-1-2014 and Letter dated 13-12-2013 is illegal, arbitrary for not
2
leveling the quarry left over pits to prevent untoward incident covering Sy.Nos. 67/4, 68/3 and 68/4 arid 147/lC 163 164, 165, 166 and 167/1 & 2 and 168 of Ramdaspet! Simhachala Nagar, within the linnits of Municipal Corporatio n of Rajahmudry, East Godavari District and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to take . ...... appropriate action for not initiating to register the complaint dated 17-1-2014 and 13-12-2013 and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. SRINIVAS KAPATIA Counsel for the Respondents: 15516/GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
When the matter is taken up for consideration today, there is no representation for the petitioner and on earlier occasion also there was no representation for the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting her case.
In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending,
shall stands closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SOI- U. SRIDEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
CTION OFFICER
To,
KSR
HIGH COURT
'
k/ .“•J-i J
DATED:15/02/2024
^^OFANOJ,»>
:^o
^ 3 1JUL OT m
^ . Current Section . ^
ORDER
WP.No.4783 of 2015
DISMISSING THE WP AS NON-PROSECUTION
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. M. Vijaya
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department
The District Collector, East Godavari District at Kakinada
The Superintendent of Police, Rajahmundry Urban
The Station House Officer, III-Town L&O P.S., Rajahmundry
The Assistant Director, Mines & Geology Department, Gandhipuram, Rajahmundry
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
