Petitioners sought the quashing of termination of services and payment of arrears as additional public prosecutors. The court permitted the withdrawal of the writ petition. The petition was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
Permission was accorded to withdraw the writ petition. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRi JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 4618 OF 2020
Between: ^
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.1 in terminating the services of the Petitioner No.1 as Additional Public
Prosecutor (tenure) to the Court of V Additional Districtand Sessions Judge Court, Kurnool At Nandyal now at Allagadda andPetitionerNo.2as- Additional Public Prosecutor (tenure) to the CourtofVIAdditional District arid Sessions Judge Court (FTC), Gooty, Ananthapuram District under g'o.R.T. No. 1008, Dated. 27.11.2019 Home (Courts.A)Departmentand ,.,.the :Radio Message No.1021834(132/2019 dated.28.11.2019 without issuing one month notice or one month honorarium ascontemplatedunder Rule 9 of Andhra Pradesh Law Officers (AppointmentandConditionsof Service) Rules, 2000 and without paying the arrearsofhonorariumfrom 1st March, 2019 till the date of termination as illegal, capricious and violative of principles of natural Justice and against the Rules contemplated under Andhra Pradesh Law Officers (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2000 and consequently direct the Respondent No.1 and 2 to pay the arrears of honorariumfrom 1 March, 2019 till the date of termination and one Month honorarium as contemplated under Rule 9 of Andhra Pradesh Law Officers(Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2000 forthwith lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.1 and 2topaythearrearsof honorarium from 1" March, 2019 till the date of terminationandoneMonth honorarium as contemplated under Rule 9 of Andhra PradeshLawOfficers (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2000forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioner:M/s. V. DYUMANI
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR LAW LEGISLATIVEAFFAIRS Counsel for the Respondents No.2 to 4:— The Court made the following: ORDER
•6.
APHC010075102020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3233]
THURSDAY ,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 4618/2020
Between:
B. Satyanarayana and Others
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.VDYUMANI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
Ms. V. Dyumani, the. learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court for withdrawal of the Writ Petition.
- Permission is accorded.
- Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders, if any, stands vacated.
o
2
As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any,shallstand
closed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- SHAJK WIOHD. RAFl assistant F^GISTRAR SECTION^^FICER
nm
HIGH COURT
DATED:14/03/2024
ORDER
WP.No.4618 of 2020
"si
'I,*1 oii:>
'/T
/
a f'-
DISMISSING THE WP AS
WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
B. Satyanarayana
M.V. Mahesh Kumar
State of Andhra Pradesh
B. Krishna Mohan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
