A writ petition seeking approval for extending a building after the municipal corporation rejected an earlier building plan application was disposed with directions to submit a fresh representation and to have it considered afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
/I
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 36624 OF 201
Between:
M.Venkata Lakshmi, W/o. Ranga Rao, aged about 52 years, occ; Household affairs R/o. D.No.44-23-19, Railway New Colony, Visakhapatanam, Visakhapatn District. ...PETITIONER
AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & Urban Development Department, A.P., Secretariat, Hyderabad.
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings of the 2“ respondent in B.A.No.2/1997/ACP-IV, dated 05.12.2014 as illegal, unjust, arbitrary, contrary to law, void, violation of rule of natural justice and accordingly set aside the same and consequently the respondents be directed to accord permission for construction of extension of ground floor on the Western side and first floor, as per the building plan submitted f by the petitioner on the premises bearing D.No.44-23-19, Railway New Colony _, Visakhapatnam, forth with.
LA. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP NO: 471fi4 of 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to re-consider the building plan submitted by the petitioner for construction, on the premises bearing D.No.44-23-19, Railway New Colony, Visakhapatnam, forth with, in terms of building bye-Laws, pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S. V. MUNI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MUNICIPAL
ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI J. DILEEP KUMAR, SC FOR
GVMC
The Court made the following: ORDER
Vv
APHC010003042015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3233]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 36624/2015
Between:
M.Venkata Lakshmi
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By Its Principal Secretary and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.S VMUNI REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP)
2.J DILEEP KUMAR
The Court made the following Order:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and thelearnedAssistant
Government Pleader for the respondents.
nd of the 2 2. This writ petition is filed questioning the proceedings respondent in B.A.No.2/1997/ACP-IV, dated 05.12.2014rejectingtheearlier representation of the petitioner seeking approval forbuildingplan.
2
s
3
As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand
closed.
j
To,
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- N. NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
SE^TI^OFFrCER
Department, State of Andhra Pradesh A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi,
Amaravati, Guntur District.
High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
ssb
HIGH COURT
DATED:05/12/2024
ORDER
WP.No.36624of 2015
^ ^ /O
m
g 18 DEC 2C2'| 05#’
^ Current Section ^
DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's building plan approval request should be reconsidered afresh by GVMC without reference to the rejected proceedings of 05.12.2014?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.Venkata Lakshmi
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation
B Krishna Mohan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
