The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed Writ Petition No. 34983 of 2012 for non-prosecution after the petitioners failed to appear for hearing on two consecutive dates when the matter was listed for dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
:PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 34983 OF 2012
Between:
f - Occupation: House wife, Resident of MIG 130, Door No.50-116-8,N
t . .''Ext. Sitammadhara, Visakhapatnam-530 013.
...Petitioner/s
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamusdeclaringtheinactionof the respondents in not paying compensation to the petitionersinrespectof their plots situate in Sy. No. 110, Madhurawada Visakhapatnam District, which were deprived of by the respondents, or in thealternativetogrant sites to the petitioners, as being illegal, arbitrary,violativeofArticles14and 300-A of the Constitution of India
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 47256 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,theHighCourtmaybe pleased to expedite the hearing of the instant WritPetitionbeingW.P.No. 34983 of 2012 by fixing an early date. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP.NO: 24777 OF 2013) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,theHighCourtmaybe pleased to direct the respondents not to conduct anyauctioninrespectof the land in Sy. No. 110 or any part thereof of Madhurawada, Visakhapatham District. Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. V PREETI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent nos. 1 and 2; GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
f
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION No.34983 of 2012
J. Kondala Rao, S/o Sri J. Lakshman Rao, aged 50 years, Occupation: Service, Resident of South Indian Bank Ltd., Hyderabad RO, 1®*^ Floor, CHAI Complex, 157, Staff Road, Gun Rock Enclave, Sikh Village, Secunderabad - 9 and 15 others.
(All the petitioners are represented by their authorized person, Sri S. Sitapati Rao, s/o Ramamurthy, aged 72 years. Occupation : Retired, Resident of Plot No. 117, Flat No.302, Ashray Elegant, Road No.3, Street No.7, West Marredpally, Secunderabad - 26.)
... Petitioners
Versus
The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and two others.
... Respondents
Counsel for the petitioners : Sri V. Preethi Reddy, learned counsel Counsel for respondents : GP for Revenue and Sri V. Suiya Kiran Kumar, standing counsel
ORDER ::
This writ petition is of the year, 2012. As there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on 24.01.2024and
2
-4
07.02.2024, the matter was directed to be listed todayunderthe caption ‘for dismissal’.
Today, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitionerseitherin the forenoon or in the afternoon. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the writ petition.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non
prosecution. No costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any,shall stand dismissed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- P. VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT^^aSTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
To
PSD
\
HIGH COURT
DATED:14/02/2024
ORDER
Of
;/x: 1 2 AUG 2m
1HO
. Current Section
WP.No.34983 of 2012
DISMISSING THE WP FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
^
J.Kondala Rao and 15 others
The Government of Andhra Pradesh
District Collector, Visakhapatnam District
Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority
Subba Reddy Satti
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
