Dismissed

Sri P.Adianrayana Murthy, E.G.Dist v. Prl Secy, Agrl and Coop Dept, Hyd and 3 Others

Andhra Pradesh HC1 Aug 2024WP/31654/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226 challenging a retirement order and related proceedings, the High Court held that the counsel stated the cause no longer survived for adjudication. Consequently, the court recorded the matter as infructuous and dismissed the petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed without costs; miscellaneous petitions, if any, stood closed.

Sri P.Adianrayana Murthy, E.G.Dist Vs… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI

¶2

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF AUGUST

¶4

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 31654 OF 2015

¶7

Between:

¶8

Sri P. Adianarayana Murthy, S/o. Sri P. Veera Swami, Aged : 58 years, Occ: Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Vemulawada PACS, Karapa^Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Agriculture and Cooperative Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶12

The Commissioner for Corporation Registrar of Cooperative^Societies, A.P., Hyderabad.

¶13

The District Co-operative Central Bank Ltd., East Godavari District, rep. by its Chief Executive Officer, Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh.

¶14

The Vemulawada Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society, Vemulawada Village, Karapa Mandal, East Godavari District,^Andhra Pradesh.

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more^particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 in orally directing the petitioner^{toretirefromtheservices} on 30.09.2015 A.N., contrary to the G.O.Ms.No.147 dated^{30.06.2014and} contrary to 1 St Respondent Memo No.5825/Coop.III/2014-7 dated 23.05.2015, and Proceedings vide Rc.No.9362/2014/Cr2,^{dated22.08.2015}

¶17

and by not considering representation dated 14.09.2015, as arbitrary, illegal, discriminative, in violation of principles^{ofnaturaljustice,violativeof} the Fundamental Right guaranteed under Articles 14^{andtheConstitutional} Right guaranteed under Constitution of India. I A NO: 1 OF 7nis (WVMP NO: 3788 OF 2015 IN WPMP.NO.40924^OF 20151

¶18

Between:

¶19

The Vemulawada Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society, Vemulawada Village Karapa Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT N0.4

¶20

AND

¶21

Sri P. Adianarayana Murthy, S/o. Sri P. Veera Swami, Aged ; 58 years, Occ; Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Vemulawada PACS, Karapa Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶22

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal^{Secretary,Agriculture} and Cooperative Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad,

¶23

The Commissioner for Corporation Registrar of Cooperative Societies, A.P., Hyderabad.

¶24

The District Co-operative Central Bank Ltd., East Godavari District, rep. by its Chief Executive Officer, Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh.

¶25

...RESPONDENTS

¶26

that in the circumstances Petition under Section 151 CPC praying stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,^{theHighCourtmaybe} order dated 29.09.2015 granted in pleased to vacate the interim and dismiss the writ W.P.M.P.No.40924/2015 in^{W.P.No.31654/2015} .. petition.

¶27

I.A. NO: 2 OF 2015 (WPMP. NO: 40924 OF 2015)

¶28

that in the circumstances Petition under Section 151 CPC praying stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,^{theHighCourtmaybe} Respondents to^continue the service of the pleased to direct the 2^^ and 4

¶29

G.O.Ms.No.147 dated 30.06.2015, Memo petitioner in reference to Proceedings vide dated 23.05.2015 and No.5825/Coop.1II/2014-7 Rc.No.9362/2014/Cr2, dated 22.08.2015 of 1st Respondent

¶30

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶31

that in the circumstances Petition under Section 151 CPC praying stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,^{theHighCourtmaybe} in the writ petition No. pleased to grant leave for filing counter affidavit 31654 of 2015.

¶32

Counsel for the Petitioner; SRI S KARTHEEK for SRI^{BASAVASRINIVAS} Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : SRI S DILIP JAYARAM Counsel for the Respondent No’s. 1 & 2: GP FOR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY

¶33

Counsel for the Respondent No.4 ; SRI K VENKATA SUBBAIAH The Court made the following Order;

[3333]

Sfir'

APHC010170652015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT ANIARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶39

FRIDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶40

PRESENT

¶41

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA

¶42

WRIT PETITION NO: 31654/2015

¶43

Between:

¶44

Sri P.adianrayana Murthy, E.g.dist

¶45

...PETITIONER

¶46

AND

¶47

PrI Secy Agrl Coop Dept Hyd 3 Others and Others

¶48

...RESPONDENT(S)

¶49

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶50

1.SRIN1VAS BASAVA

¶51

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶52

1.GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) 2.S DILIP JAYA RAM 3. ELEVATED AS JUDGE

¶53

The Court made the following:

¶54

ORDER:

¶55

Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri.S.Kartheek,^learned counsel representing Sri.Srinivas Basava, learned counsel^{forthepetitioner} informed this Court that the cause in the Writ Petition^{doesnotsurvivefor} further adjudication and the matter has become infructuous.

¶56

as infructuous. 2. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed There shall be no order as to costs.

¶57

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ^{Petitionshallstand} closed.

¶58

Sd/- B. PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ■'i\

¶59

SE FFICER

¶60

To,

¶61

OneCCto SRI. SRINIVAS BASAVA Advocate [OPUC] COOPERATION, High Court of Andhra Pradesh.

¶62

Two CCs to GP FOR

¶63

[OUT]

¶64

OneCCtoSRl. S.^{DILIPJAVARAM,Advocate,SCFORDCCBBANK,}

¶65

High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OPUC]

¶66

K VENKATA SUBBAIAH, Advocate [OPUC]

¶67

1. OneCCtoSRl

¶68

Three CD Copies

¶69

DPBR

PRK

uropv

HIGH COURT

DATED;02/08/2024

ORDER

WP.No.31654of 2015

O
aro I 6 JAN 2025 Com
'S' . Current Section

¶77

DISMISSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS

Sri P.Adianrayana Murthy, E.G.Dist v. Prl Secy, Agrl and Coop Dept, Hyd and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri P.Adianrayana Murthy, E.G.Dist v. Prl Secy, Agrl and Coop Dept, Hyd and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Uma Devi, Anantapuram Dist Vs Prl Secy, W and Cw Dept, Hyd and 5 Others

E. Sreenivasa Reddy, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

E.Venkata Ramana, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

V.Jagadish, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

D.M., Apsrtc, W.G. Dist. Vs D.V. Ramana Rao and Ano.

M.Ranganatha Prasad, Kurnool District and 7 Others Vs Prl Secy, Agri. and Coop Dept, Hyderabad and 2 Others