Habeas-type writ petition regarding an alleged detenue. Counsel stated the detenue had been produced before the civil court after filing, leaving nothing to adjudicate; the court recorded the statement and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010581072024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3494]
FRIDAY, TH E TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO T H OUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION No.30244 of 2024
Between:
AND
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Respondents:
The Court made the following ORDER: ( per NJS,J)
Heard the learne d counsel for the petitioner. Also heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader attached to the Offi c e of the learned Advocate Gener a l.
2
WP_30244_2024
__________________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J
__________________________ SUMATHI JAGADAM,J
December 20, 2024. vasu
Nerusu Anitha
The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home
The Superintendent of Police, Guntur District
The Station House Officer, Old Guntur Police Station, Guntur City and District
Ninala Jayasurya
Sumathi Jagadam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
