Dismissed

Kannikanti Ganga Bhavani W/o late Koteswara Rao v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC21 Feb 2024WP/30016/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw Writ Petition No. 30016 OF 2015 which challenged the police's non-registration of an FIR and non-investigation. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of Writ Petition permitted and the petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs.

Kannikanti Ganga Bhavani W/o late Koteswara… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

it. - ■'

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI^

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY . THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF FEBRUAR>^^^^^

¶4

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶5

r> -o

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO. WRIT PETITION NO: 30016 OF 2015 ^

¶8

Between:

¶9

Kannikanti Ganga Bhavani W/o late Koteswara Rao, Occ: Housewife, R/o Marribandam Village Nuzvid Mandal, Krishna District Andhra Pradosh

¶10

...Petitioner.

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its PrI. Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, at Hyderabad

¶13

The Superintendent of Police, Krishna District at Chilakalapudi Machilipatnam, Krishna District Andhra Pradesh-521002

¶14

The Dy. Superintendent of Police, Nuzvid, Krishna District Andhra Pradesh-521201

¶15

The Station House Officer, Nuzvid Rural Police Station Nuzvid, Krishna District Andhra Pradesh-521201

¶16

Ch.Naga Prasad S/o. father's name not known to the petitione, Occ: Working as Sub-Inspector of Police Nuzvid Rural Police Station R/o. Nuzvid, Krishna District Andhra Pradesh-521201

¶17

Nandamuri Rama Brahmam, S/o late Venkata Rama Krishna Rao, Occ: Cultivation R/o. D.No.19-81/11, Ammavari Thota Nuzvid Town, Krishna District Andhra Pradesh-521201

¶18

...Respondents^'

¶19

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order rhore particularly one in the nature of

¶20

mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.4 in not registering the complaint dated 31-07-2015 lodged by the petitioner against respondent No.6 and not giving acknowledgment to the petitioner for the complaiht lodged by her and not conducting investigation on the complaint lodged by the petitioner as arbitrary, illegal and violation of principles of natural justice, violation of ArticleM4 & 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4 th respondent to register FIR and conduct investigation and submit final report on the complaint dated 31-07-2015 lodged by the petitioner and further direct the respondents 1 to 3 to take appropriate action against the 5**^ respondent for not registering the complaint dated 31-07-2015 lodged by the petitioner^asFIR - -

¶21

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 38851 OF 2015^

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4^" respondent to register the complaint dated 31-07-2015 as FIR and conduct investigation and submit final reports'

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner :SRI. CH B R P SEKHAR ^

¶24

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME X'

¶25

SRI SREENIVASA RAO VELIVELA

¶26

The Court made the following:

¶27

‘ APHC0I0224772015

¶28

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶29

THURSDAY .THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶30

[3310]

¶31

PRESENT

¶32

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO

¶33

WRIT PETITION NO: 30016 OF 201*;

¶34

Between:

¶35

Kannikanti Ganga Bhavani W/o late Koteswara Rao

¶36

AND

¶37

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERS

¶38

...PETITIONER(S)

¶39

...RESPONPENT(S)

¶40

Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. CH B R P SEKHAR

¶41

Counsel for the Respondents: 8313/SREENIVASA RAO VELIVELA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME (AP)

¶42

The Court made the following Order:

¶43

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Rama Shankar, learned counsel representing Sri Ch.B.R.P.Sekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition.

¶44

Permission is accorded.

¶45

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶46

There shall be no order as to costs.

¶47

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand

¶48

dismissed.

¶49

Sd/- M.RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

Tp,

7 ® SEKHAR Advocate lOPUCl " " 2. One CC to SRI SREENIVASA RAO VELIVELA Advocate tOPUCl 4; Two CD^Cop^s Pradesh. [OUT] ''

PSR

' A

HIGH COURT

DATED:22/02/2024

ORDER

WP.No.30016 of 2015

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

Kannikanti Ganga Bhavani W/o late Koteswara Rao v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kannikanti Ganga Bhavani W/o late Koteswara Rao v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

K.Radha Krishna, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Thurka Tirupathamma Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Devarakonda Malleswari, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep By its Prl. Secretary

Ulabala Rama Lakshmi, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Principal Secretary

Narala Bal Reddy , Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Bommasani Mutyala Rao, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by Pri Secretary