APSRTC driver sought regularization of services from 1998; writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as neither petitioner nor counsel appeared despite repeated listings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 29224 OF 2011
Between:
^
Villaarp^lannmn^f Swamy, Driver, E.No. 750526, Post& Village P. Jaggmpet, Nadhavaram Mandal, District Visakhapatnam.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records from the respondents herein and issue writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondent in not reguiarizing petitioner's services on par with his coileagues with effect from 01.08.1998 as per the proceedings No. P3/255(21)/98-RMA/SP, dated 25.11.1998 as illegal, unjust, contrary to law, arbitrary and also in violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents to regularize his services with effect from 01.08.1998 i in terms of the Proceedings No. P3/255(21)/98-RM/VSP.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2011fWPMP. NO: 36173 OF 2011)
. Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances / Staled in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court iVray be pleased to fix an early date of hearing the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI P. SRIDHAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI VINOD KUMAR TARLADA
(SC FOR APSRTC)
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010016492011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3457]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 29224/2011
Between:
D. Varaha Narsimha Rao, Vsp.
...PETITIONER
AND M D Apsrtc Hyd 2 Ors and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.PSRIDHAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.VINOD KUMAR TARLADA (SC FOR APSRTC)
The Court made the following Order:
Despite the matter being listed under the caption for
dismissal, today none represented for the petitioner.On earlier
occasions also, there was no representation for the petitioner.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non
prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,shall
\
To,
stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- P. vrNOD KUMAR assistant registrar
SECTION OFFICER
Cnr
. ^
HIGH COURT
DATED;24/12/2024
ORDER
WP.No.29224 of 2011
A«o5;^
5 I3JUN2()?5 ™
* Curreni aectiun .
DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
D. Varaha Narsimha Rao
The APSRTC, rep. by its Managing Director
The Regional Manager, APSRTC, Visakhapatnam District
The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Narsipatnam
Harinath.N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
