High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravati disposed of a writ petition under Article 226 as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to prefer a government appeal, dismissing it without costs.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to prefer a government appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 2865 OF 2020
Between:
...Petitioners
AND
y
' V'i ■■ •***•;•■
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the order of the 1st respondent passed in Go.Ms.No.18, Revenue (Lands - VI) Department, dt.29.1.2020 as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice apart from one without jurisdiction.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order of the 1st respondent issued in Go.Ms.No.18, Revenue (Lands - VI) Department, dt.29.1,2020, pending disposal of the WP.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI. P SRAVAN KUMAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL
The Court made the following order:
1
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDAR
WRIT PETITION No. 2865 of 2020
ORDER:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice G.Narendar)
- The counsel for the petitioners prays leave of theCourt to withdraw the Writ Petition and filed a memo along with a copy of the letter addressed by the petitioner No.1 to that effect.
- The same is placed on record.
- The counsel for the petitioners further submits thattheyintend to prefer an appeal to the Government over the impugnedorders passed by the Collector and in the event of such appealisrejected M or negated, liberty may be granted to seek relief againstthesame.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this petition shall stand closed.
Sd/- P.VINOD KUMAR assistant registrar
//TRUE COPY//
A/^
SECTION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT DATED:21/10/2024
ORDER
WP.No.2865 of 2020
X 2 3 APR 2025
^ . Current Seciion ^f
DISMISSING OF THE WP AS WITHDRAWN
WITHOUT COSTS
R.Srinivas Reddy
Telugu Desam Party
State of Andhra Pradesh
District Collector
Tahsildar
Chief Engineer
G.NARENDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
