This is a single-line order dismissing a writ petition for being infructuous. The petition challenged inaction regarding posting orders and Fresh Service Document extension. The court recorded the petitioner's submission that the matter was infructuous and dismissed the petition without consideration of merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3331]
APHC010509762024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
SATURDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 26445/2024
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to issue an Order, Direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondent No.2 to issue the posting order or to extend the FSD in Respondent No.4 hospital is highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust against Article 14,20,300-A of the Constitution of India and also against the principles of
natural justice and consequently directing the Respondent No.2 to issue posting orders and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 2 to consider my representation dt:17-09-2024pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.R GOPI MOHAN
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR SERVICES IV
The Court made the following:
Sri D.S.V.Prasad, learned counsel representing Sri R.Gopi Mohan, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________ SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J
Dated: 23.11.2024 SNI
57
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 26445/2024
Dated: 23.11.2024 SNI
MADDU RAVI KUMAR
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF SECONDARY HEALTH BOARD, TADEPALLI
THE MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT, AREA HOSPITAL, GUDURU
THE DISTRICT COORDINATE OF HEALTH SERVICES DCHS, NELLORE
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
