M/s Sri Venkata Ramana Commission Merchants v. State of Ap
Andhra Pradesh HCWP/245/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioners challenged specific Government Orders regarding license renewal conditions. The court closed the writ petition as the impugned order had been superseded by a subsequent modification.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
M
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
¶3
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
¶4
WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
¶5
PRESENT
¶6
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
¶7
WRIT PETITION NO: 245 OF 2019
¶8
Between:
¶9
- M/s Sri Venkata Ramana Commission Merchants, Rep. by its Managing Partner B.Veera Reddy, S/o. Sri Pitchi Reddy, aged about 58 years. Plot No. A2/30, Market yard, Guntur.
¶10
- M/s Sri Venkateswara General Commission Merchants, Rep. by its managing partner, B.Govinda Reddy, S/o. Koti Reddy, aged about 32 years. Plot No. A2/29, Market Yard, Guntur.
¶11
- M/s Murali Traders, Rep. by its managing partner,SriG.VenkataKrishna Reddy, S/o. Sri Venkata Reddy, aged about 42 years. Plot No. C2/390, Market Yard,Guntur.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
M/s Sri Venkata Ramana Commission Merchants
- petitioner
M/s Sri Venkateswara General Commission Merchants
- petitioner
M/s Murali Traders
- petitioner
M/s Manchikalapuri Koteswara rao and co.
- petitioner
M/s Lakshmi Traders
- petitioner
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Andhra Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/245/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court