Allowed

R.Krishnappa v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC22 Aug 2024WP/22972/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed batch writ petitions seeking retrospective regularization for pension benefits from 25.11.1993 for contingent employees legalized retrospectively without prior monetary arrears, directing govt to give effect from 5-year cutoff.

What did the court decide?

Direct respondents to treat petitioners as regularized from 25.11.1993 for pension and pensionary benefits without monetary arrears for that period.

R.Krishnappa Vs The State of Andhra… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

t IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AM (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

FRIDAY. THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO

¶5

WRIT PETITION Nos: 22180, 21579. 21585. 21587. 21588.^21589,21591, 21597. 21604, 21606. 21609, 21677. 21697. 21699. 22972^of2022;28896 16862, 18832, 8768 and 13311 of 2021: 24419. 23863.^4976of2020

¶6

WRIT PETITION No: 22180 of 2022

¶7

Between:

¶8

G. Anjaneyvilu, S/o- G. Venkata Ramana, Aged about 57 years, Occ: Techmical Assistant, O/o. Asst. Director of Sericulture, Kalyandurgam, Anantbapuram district,

¶9

R/o. D.No. 10-1-6/37-1, NTR Colony, Raidurgam, Anantbapuramu District — 515 865-

¶10

K. Babaiab, S/o. Nalla Peddanna, aged about 55 years, Occ: Technical Assistant, O/o. Asst. Director of Sericulture, Kalyandurgam, Anantbapurarp district

¶11

R/o. 3/96/1, l^uccbirami Dbarmavaram, Muccburami, Anantbapur, A.P. 515672.

¶12

D. Muniswamy, S/o. Late Devaraju, Aged about 51 years, Occ: Technical Assistant, O/o. Asst. Director of Sericulture, M.F.T.U, Anantbapuramu, Ananthapuramu District, R/o. D.NO. 1-659, Gutti Taluq, Ananthapuram -515 401.

¶13

A.Ravindra Babu, S/o. Late Satyanarayana, Aged about 55 years, Occ: Technical Assistant, R/o. D.No. 15-47, Sai Nagar, Madakasira, Ananthapuram, Andhra Pradesh 515 301.

¶14

N. Chalapathi Naidu, S/o. Narasirnba Naidu, Aged about 54 years,Occ: Technical Asst. O/o. Asst. Director of Sericulture, Kadiri, Ananthapuramu district,

¶15

R/o. D.No. 15-216-C,

¶16

Main Road, Kuttagala, Kedari Taluq, Ananthapur -515 54 1.

¶17

D. Rasool, S/o. Musthafa, age: 59 years, Occ: Technical Assistant, Office of Assistant Director of Sericulture, LRSA, Gorantla, Sree Satya Sai District.

¶18

7. P. Uttanna, S/p. Ganganna, aged about 58 years, Occ: Technical Assistant, Office of Assistant Director of Sericulture, Hindupuram, Sree Satya Sai District.
8. Gaddam Anjaneyulu, S/o. Gaddam Rama3^a, Aged about 56 years, Occ: Technical Asst. O/o. Asst. Director of Sericulture, Kalyanadurgam, Ananthapuramu District, R/o. D.No. 28-7-11, Hamali Colony, Housing Board, Ananthapur, Ananthapur District. 515001.
9. Midathala Chandrasekhar, S/o. M. Mallappa, Aged about 59 years, Occ: Technical Assistant, O/o. TSC, Kandurpi, Ananthapuramu district, R/o. H.No. 28-6-878, Hamali Colony, Ananthapur, Ananthapur District -515001.
lO.M.P. Babaiah, S/o. Muthyalappa, Aged aboiut 55 years, Occ; Technical Assistant, O/o. Assistant Director of Sericulture, Kalyanadurgam, R/o. H.No. 8-650-1, Marammapalli, 8^^ Ward, Kalyanadurgam, Ananthapur District 515 761.
11. Kundala Subramanyam, S/o. K. N^rayana, Aged about 53 years, Occ: Technical Assistant, O/o. Assistant Director of Sericulture, Penukonda, Ananthapuramu District. R/o. 6/47, Chenne Kothapalle, Ananthapur, Andhra Pradesh 515 lOl.
12. Shaik Maha Boob Peera, S/o. Late Vali Saheb, Aged about 54 years, Occ; Technical Assistant, O/o. Assistant Director of Sericulture, Kalyanadurgam, Ananthapuramu District. R/o. D,No, 5-278, B.C. Colony, Kothacheruvu, Ananthapur,AndhraPradesh515133.

¶19

K. Ramanjaneyulu, S/o.Late Ramaiah, Aged about 55 years,Occ: Technical Assistant, O/o. Assistant Director of Sericulture, Hindupuram, Ananthapuramu District. R/o. D.N. 5-3-191/1, DR Colony,Hindupur, Ananthapur, Andhra Pradesh - 515 201.

¶20

¶21

Nagasamudram Venkateswarlu, S/o. Narayanappa, aged about 54 years, Occ: Technical Assistant, O/o. Assistant Director of Sericulture, Hindupuram, Ananthapuramu District. R/o. 1-236-24, Vajralapeta, Penukonda Mandalam, Ananthapuramu District, A.P. 515.110.

¶22

S.Md. Akbar,S/o.Lal Ahamed, Aged about 60 years, Occ; Technical Assistant Occ: Assistant Director of Sericulture, Kalyanadurgam, Ananthapuramu District. R/o. D.No. 28-1-594, Buddappa Nagar,

¶23

Ananthapuram -515 001.

¶24

J.Amruthamall, D/o. Jinarajdas, Aged about 56 years, Occ: Technical Assistant, O/o. Assistant Director of Sericulture, MFTU, Ananthapuramu,

¶25

Ananthapuramu District 515001.

¶26

S.Shaheeda Bahu, W/o. (Late) S. Basha, Aged about 54 years, Occ; Technical Assistant,

¶27

O/o. Asst. Director of Sericulture, MFTU, Ananthapuramu,

¶28

Ananthapuramu -515001.

¶29

B. Venkatesulu, S/o. B. Venkataswami Aged about 60 years, Occ:Technical Assistant, O/o. Asst. Director of Sericulture, MFTU, Ananthapuramu,

¶30

R/o. D.No. 1-103A, P. Yaleru, Atmakur, Ananhapuramu, 515 751.

¶31

Ananthapuramu District.

¶32

S. Imam Saheb, S/o. Mabusab, Aged about 59 years: Occ; Technical Assistant, O/o. Asst. Director of Sericulture, Kadiri,

¶33

Ananthapuramu district, R/o. D.No. 9-276-21, Masanam Peta, Kadiri, Ananthapuramu district.

¶34

G. Basava Raju, S/o. G. Narayanappa, Aged about 54 years, Occ: Technical Assistant O/o. Asst. Director of Sericulture, Kalyanadurgam, Ananthapuramu district, R/o. D.No. 1-52, Salakam Cheruvu, Singanamalai, Ananthapuramu district.

¶35

¶36

K. Parvathamma, W/o.D. Nagaraju, Aged about 58 years, Occ; Technical Assistant O/o. The Deputy Director of Sericulture, Hindupur, Satyasai district, R/o. D.No. 3-71, Mukkadipeta, Hindupur, Ananthapur district (presently Satyasai District). 22. T. Krishna Murthy, S/o. (late) Subbanna, Aged about -^pyears, Occ: Technical Assistant O/o. The Director of Sericulture, APSSRD, Hindupuram, Ananthapur District (presently Satyasai district). 23. K.Ravindra Babu, S/o. (Late) Satyanarayana, Aged about ^^years, Occ: Technidal Assistant O/d. The Assistant Director of Sericulture, Tadakalapalli, Madakasira Mandal, Ananthapuramu district (presently Satya sai district) R/o.D.No. 15/47, Sai Nagar, Madakasira, Ananthapuramu district (presently Satya sai district)

¶37

..Petitioners

¶38

And

¶39

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. By its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶40

The Commissioner of Sericulture, Guntur, Guntur District.

¶41

The Joint Director of Sericulture, Ananthapuramu, Ananthapuramu District.

¶42

The Assistant Director of Sericulture, Penukonda, Ananthapuramu District.

¶43

The Assistant Director of Sericulture, Kadiri, Ananthapuramu District. 6. The Assistant Director of Sericulture, MFTU, Ananthapuramu, Ananthapuramu District. 7. The Assistant Director of Sericulture, Tadakalapalli, Madakasira Mandal, Ananthapuramu district (presently Satya sai district)

¶44

.. Respondents

¶45

¶46

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in not granting retrospective regularisation from the date of completion of 5 years/or before 25-11-1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to regularisation of petitioners service as held by the Honourable Supreme Court in civil appeal no. 6318/2015 dt. 17-08-2015 and also followed by the combined Honourable AP High^Court in WP No. 33936/2011 and batch dt. 02-05-2018 is illegal, arbitrary^{andviolativeofthe} principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularisation from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25-11-1993 as held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in civil appeal no. 6318/2015 dt. 17-08-2015 which were followed by the^{combinedHon’bleAP} High Court in WP.No. 33936/2011 and batch dt. 02-05-2018.

¶47

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶48

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners for retrospective regularisation from the date of completion of 5 years/^{orbefore25.11.1993} in terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 6318/2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the^{combinedHon'bleA.P.} High Court in WP No. 33936/2011 and batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA No. 414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422, pending disposal of^{theWritPetition.}

¶49

Counsel for the Petitioners; SRI K.SRINIVASA PRASAD

¶50

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - I

¶51

¶52

¶53

WRIT PETITION NO: 21579 OF 2022

¶54

Between:

¶55

D.Seethaiah, S/o Bangariah, aged about 58 years

¶56

Smt.N.Chandramma, W/o Gopal, aged about 59 years.

¶57

Smt.M.Damayanthi, W/o Sudharshan Rao, aged about 57 years.

¶58

Smt.N.Lalithamma, W/o Poll Naidu, aged about 55 years

¶59

Smt.K.Malathi, D/o Kamalaiah, aged about 52 year.

¶60

Smt.K.Bhanumathi, W/o Kondal Rao, aged about 54 years.

¶61

Smt.K.Savitri, W/o Karanna, aged about 58 years.

¶62

Smt.M.Pentamma, W/o Appala Naidu, aged about 55 years. 9. Smt.T.Narsamma, M. Appa Rao, aged about 58 years. 10. Smt.U.Savithri, W/o Thirupathi Rao, aged about 56 years. 11. Smt.D.Usha Rani, W/o,Chakrapani, aged about 53 years. 12. Smt.M.Subhadramma, W/o Kondal Rao, aged about 55 years. 13. D.Rama Rao, S/o Pentaiah, aged about 56 years. 14. D.Simhachalam, S/o Polaiah, aged about 56 years. 15. D Laxmana Rao, S/o Bangaraiah, aged about 60 years. 16. G.Gopi, S/o Venkataiah, aged about 59 years. 17. P.Guruvulu, S/o Chittaiah, aged about 59 years. (All are working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined Vijayanagaram District, Andhra Pradesh)

¶63

...Petitioners

¶64

AND

¶65

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture and Co.operation (H and S) Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶66

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶67

The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Guntur.

¶68

The Joint Director of Sericulture, Visakhapatnam District.

¶69

...Respondents

¶70

¶71

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly^one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in not granting retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to regularization of petitioner service for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 as followed by the combined Hon'ble AP High Court in WP No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6) and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years of service on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020 , dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon’ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021.

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP No.33936/2011 & batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020,^dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal of the writ petition.

¶76

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶77

Petition under Section 151 CPC r/w Rule 12 (2) of Writ Proceedings Rules, 1977 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to the respondent No.3 in the WP.No. 21579 of 2022 to file counter affidavit on behalf of all the respondents in the writ petition.

¶78

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES II

¶79

WRIT PETITION NO: 21585 OF 207?

¶80

Between:

¶81

J.Venkata Reddy, S/o Narayan Reddy, aged about 60 years.

¶82

B.Rubenu, S/o Subbaiah, aged about 57 years.

¶83

K.Krishna Rao, S/o K.Purnachandra Rao, aged about⁵⁷ years. 4. P.Rama Mohana Rao, S/o Sambaiah, aged about 56 years.

¶84

M.Nagaseshulu, S/o Sowri, aged about 56 years.

¶85

N.Krishna, S/o Nageswar Rao, aged about 58 years.

¶86

A.Yacob, S/o Musalaiah, aged about 58 year.

¶87

Smt.Samrajyam, W/o Lutherpaul, aged about 57 years. 9. G.Nooka Raju, S/o Papaiah, aged about 54 years. 10. Smt.P.Rajamma, W/o Gurumurthy, aged about 59 years. 11. O.Jayaram, S/o Gangaiah, aged about 60 years. 12. V.Rajendraprasad, S/o Suryanarayana, aged about 54 years.

¶88

% 13. P.Kondaiah, S/o Nagaiah, aged about 57 years. (All are working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh)

¶89

...Petitioners

¶90

AND

¶91

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture and Co.operation (H and S) Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶92

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶93

The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Guntur.

¶94

The Joint Director of Sericulture, Ananthapur District.

¶95

...Respondents

¶96

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly^one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in not granting retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to regularization of petitioner service for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 as followed by the combined Hon'ble AP High Court in WP No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6) and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Honble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years of service on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015

¶97

dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon’ble High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6,11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021.

¶98

lA NO: 1 OF 202?

¶99

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits in terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP No.33936/2011 and batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal of the writ petition.

¶100

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

¶101

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

¶102

WRIT PETITION NO: 21587 OF 2022

¶103

Between:

¶104

J.Laxmi Narayana, S/o Ramanna, aged about 57 years. 2. Smt.S.Ramanamma, W/o Venkat Rao, aged about 56 years. 3. Smt.P.Jeevarathnam, D/o Venkataswamy, aged about 60 years 4. Smt.K.Thirunadam. W/o Babu Rao. aged about 60 years.

¶105

Smt.A.Kalarani, W/o Ramchandra Rao aged about 52 years.

¶106

Smt.A.Santamma, D/o Appanna, aged about 58 years.

¶107

Smt.K.Sarojini, W/o Appa Rao, aged about 54 years.

¶108

Smt.B.Venkatamma, W/o Dharma Rao, aged about 53 years.

¶109

Smt.N.Vijaya, W/o Varahalu, aged about 57 years. (All are working as Field Assistant/Tech.Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh )

¶110

...Petitioners

¶111

AND

¶112

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture and Co.operation (H and S) Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶113

The State of Andhra Pradesh, , Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶114

The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Guntur.

¶115

The Joint Director of Sericulture, Visakhapatnam^District.

¶116

...Respondents

¶117

¶118

retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years of service on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021.

¶119

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶120

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits in terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP No.33936/2011 & batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal of the writ petition.

¶121

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

¶122

WRIT PETITION NO: 21588 OF 7099

¶123

Between:

¶124

K. Gangaraju, S/o Pullaiah, aged about 53 years.

¶125

^ 2, A. Raja Rao, S/o Krishna, aged about 59 years. (Both are working as Field Assistantfrech.Assistant under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh )

¶126

...Petitioners

¶127

AND

¶128

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture and Co-operation (H and S) Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶129

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary,^Finance Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶130

The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Guntur.

¶131

The Joint Director of Sericulture, Visakhapatnam District.

¶132

...Respondents

¶133

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in

¶134

the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly^one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in not granting retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to regularization of petitioner service for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 as followed by the combined Hon'ble AP High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6) and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years of service on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in

¶135

r WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021.

¶136

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶137

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits in terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP No.33936/2011 & batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020 , dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court In WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal of the writ petition.

¶138

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

¶139

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

¶140

WRIT PETITION NO: 21589 OF 2079

¶141

Between:

¶142

B Gopi, S/o Achu Babu, aged about 58 years. 2. M.Demudu, S/o Chinnaiah, aged about 59 years (Both are workino as qprin Assistant under the control of Joint Director^of Sericulture, combined Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh)

¶143

...Petitioners

¶144

AND

¶145

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture and Co.operation (H and S) Department, Velagapudi’, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶146

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶147

The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Guntur.

¶148

The Joint Director of Sericulture, Visakhapatnam^District.

¶149

...Respondents

¶150

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly^one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in not granting retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to regularization of petitioner service for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 as followed by the combined Hon'ble AP High Court in WP No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6) and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years of service on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP

¶151

\v, No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021.

¶152

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶153

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits in terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal of the writ petition.

¶154

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

¶155

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES -1

¶156

WRIT PETITION NO: 21591 OF 2022

¶157

Between:

¶158

K.Siva Nayak, S/o Laxmi Nayak, aged about 59 years. 2. A.Sreeramachandrudu, S/o Subbaraidu, aged about 61 years. 3. S.Panduranga Reddy, S/o Venkata Rangareddy, aged⁵⁵ yrs. 4. K.Pola Raju, S/o Pedda Raghavaiah, aged about 59 years. 5. T.Venkateswarlu, S/o Subba Rangaiah, aged about⁵⁷ years. 6. D.Satyanarayana, S/o Narsimhulu, aged about 57 years.

¶159

A.Sreeramachandrudu, S/o Subbaraidu, aged about 61 years.

¶160

Y.S.V.Prasada Rao, S/o Venkatanarasimha Rao, aged about 57 yrs.

¶161

M.Hanumantha Rao, S/o Narayana, aged about 56 years. 9. I.Anji Reddy, S/o Nagi Reddy, aged about 56 years.

¶162

Smt.G.Vijayanirmala Devi, W/o Guravaiah, aged about 54 years.

¶163

Smt.P.Asiyakhathun, S/o Sk.Iqbal Hussain, aged about 55 years.

¶164

B.V.Sivaramaiah, S/o Chinna Ramaiah, aged about 53 years.

¶165

B.Devaiah, S/o Kondaiah, aged about 59 years.

¶166

D.Nemalaiah, S/o Peeraiah, aged about 58 years.

¶167

D.Gurumurthy, S/o Veeraiah, aged about 60 years.

¶168

Smt.M.Mariyamma, W/o Paul, aged about 58 years.

¶169

Smt.S.Suryakumari, W/o Thirupathaiah, aged about 60 years.

¶170

G.V.Subba Reddy, S/o Papi Reddy, aged about 55 years.

¶171

A.Venkateswarlu, S/o Chennakesavulu, aged about 53 years.

¶172

K.Papa Rao, S/o Venkataiah, aged about 60 years.

¶173

P.K.Narsimha Rao, S/o Penchalaih, aged about 57 years.

¶174

A.V.Ranga Reddy, S/o Ranga Reddy, aged about 60 years. 23. D.Guru Murthy, S/o Veeraiah, aged about 56 years. (All are working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined Prakasham District, Andhra Pradesh)

¶175

...Petitioners

¶176

AND

¶177

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture and Co.operation (H and S) Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶178

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary,^Finance Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶179

The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Guntur.

¶180

¶181

The Joint Director of Sericulture, Ananthapur district.

...Respondents

years on or before 25.11.1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to regularization of petitioner service for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 as followed by the combined Hon'ble AP High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6) and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years of service on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020. dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021. lA NO: 1 OF 202? Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits in terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP No.33936/2011 and batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders

¶186

passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal of the writ petition.

¶187

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P RAGHAVENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

¶188

WRIT PETITION NO: 21597 OF 2022

¶189

Between:

¶190

S Dharma Raju, S/o Soma Raju, aged about 59 years, working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh

¶191

T.Subramanyam, S/o P.Krishna Murthy, aged about 59 years, working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh

¶192

M.Musalaiah, S/o Bullappi, aged about 56 years, working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh

¶193

D.Venkata Ramana, S/o Ramaswamy, aged about 52 years, working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh

¶194

Smt.V.Lakshmi, W/o Paramasundar Rao, aged about 60 years, working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh

¶195

P.Venkat Rao, S/o Satyam, aged about 60 years, working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh

¶196

L.Veera Raju, S/o Nookaraju, aged about 58 years, working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh

¶197

Smt.B.V.L.Kumari, W/o Eliya, aged about 53 years, working as Field Assistant/Tech.Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh

¶198

Smt.K.Jayalakshmi, W/o Venkateswar Rao, aged about 57 years, working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh

¶199

Id
10.
P.Mallu Dora, S/o Balu Dora, aged about 52 years, working as
Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of
Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
11. Smt.D.Ramalakshmi, W/o Vishnu Raju, aged about 57 years,
working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint
Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
12. Smt.N.Ganga Devi, W/o Chinna Rao, aged about 55 years
working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint
Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
13. Smt.K.Ramana, W/o Nookaraju, aged about 55 years, working as
Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of
Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
14.
Smt.D.Parvathi, W/o Shivaram, aged about 58 year, working as
Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of
Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
15. Smt.P.Satyavathi, W/o Satyanarayana, aged about 56 years
working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint
Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
16.
M.Venkatagiri, S/o Raja Bai, aged about 54 years, working as
Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of
Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
17. Smt.S.Chandramma, W/o Gavarraju, aged about 58 years
working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint
Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari. Andhra Pradesh
18. M.Ramana, S/o George, aged about 53 years, working as Field
Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of
Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
...Petitioners
AND

¶200

The State of Andhra Pradesh
. . rep.by its Special Chief Secretary,
Agriculture and Co.operation (F) and S) Department, Velagapudi,
Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
2. The State of Andhra Pradesh
p. . ^ . rep.by its Principal Secretary, Finance
Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. Guntur District.
3. The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh,
Guntur.
4. The Joint Director of Sericulture, Visakhapatnam District.

¶201

...Respondents

¶202

¶203

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly^one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in not granting retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to regularization of petitioner service for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 as followed by the combined Hon’ble AP High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6) and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No.4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years of service on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015dt.17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon’ble High Court in WP No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon’ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021.

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

terms of orders passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon’ble High Court in WP No.33936/2011 and batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon’ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal of the . writ petition.

¶208

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

¶209

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

¶210

WRIT PETITION NO: 21604 OF 2022

¶211

Between:

¶212

T.Venkata Seshaiah, S/o Thiru Vengalaiah, aged about⁵⁶ yrs. 2. P.Nagaraju, S/o Gurumuthi, aged about 56 yrs.

¶213

S.Abdul Rawoof, S/o Mahabub Saheb, aged about 58 yrs. 4. Smt.E.Narayanamma, W/o Sanjanna, aged about 56 yrs.

¶214

K.Fathima, W/o Rajasekhar, aged about 56 years.

¶215

Smt.P.Jayamma, W/o P.Rajasekhar, aged about 59 years. 7. K.Rajgopal, S/o Narayanappa, aged about 54 years. 8. P.Shankaraiah, S/o P.Ramaiah, aged about 55 yrs. 9. K.Shankar, S/o Pedda Eswaraiah . , aged about 60 years. (All are

¶216

working as Field Assistant/Tech.Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh)

¶217

...Petitioners

¶218

AND

¶219

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture and Co.operation (H and S) Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶220

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary Finance Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶221

The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh; Guntur.

¶222

The Joint Director of Sericulture, Anananthapur^district.

¶223

...Respondents

¶224

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly^one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in not granting retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to regularization of petitioner service for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 as followed by the combined Hon’ble AP High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6) and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon’ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years of service on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon’ble High Court in 'WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and • also orders passed in WA No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021.

¶225

Ifk

¶226

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶227

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits in terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 & batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in . 2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt.6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal of the writ petition.

¶228

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

¶229

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

¶230

WRIT PETITION No: 21606 of 2022

¶231

Between:

¶232

Y.Venkatasubbaiah, S/o Gangaiah, aged about 54 years.

¶233

Smt.G.Sarojini Devi, W/o Harikumar, aged about 56 years. 3. N.Chennaiah, S/o N.Chennaiah, aged about 59 years. 4. L.Shivarami Reddy, S/o Chinna Oblareddy, aged about⁵⁹ yrs. 5. V.Gurrappa, S/o Pedda Venkatesu, aged about 53 years.

¶234

K.M.D.Rasulla, S/o Pedda Rasul Saheb, aged about⁵⁷ years. 7. M.Rama Mohan Rao, S/o Late M.Bayannasetty, aged^about57 yrs. 8. N.Satyanandam, S/o Vedanayakam, aged about 60 years. 9. P.Yesanna, S/o Jakkaraiah, aged about 59 years. 10. M.Venkat Rama Raju, S/o M.Naga Raju (Late), aged about⁵⁵ yrs. 11. M.Anwar Ul Haq, S/o Ibrahim, aged about 58 years. 12. A.Ramasubba Reddy, S/o Chenna Reddy, aged about 55 years.

¶235

^ 13. C.Chandrasekhar Raju, S/o Rama Raju, aged about 60 yers. 14. C.Viswanadham, S/o Chinnappa, aged about 56 years. 15. G.Narayana, S/o Venkataiah, aged about 59 years. 16. P.Venkat Rama Raju, S/o Chinna Ganga Raju, aged 56 years. 17. S.Khasim Saheb, S/o Naseeruddin Saheb, aged about 59 years. 18. M.Rama Murthy, S/o Laxmaiah, aged about 56 years. 19. S.Saheb Peer, S/o Ghouse peer, aged about 58 years. 20. Smt.V.Narayanamma, W/o Late Kondaiah, aged about 57 years. 21. I.Venkataramana Reddy, S/o Seetharami Reddy, aged about⁵⁹ years (All are working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh)

¶236

...Petitioners

¶237

AND

¶238

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture and Co.operation (H and S) Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶239

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶240

The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Guntur.

¶241

The Joint Director of Sericulture, Chittoor, Chittoor District

¶242

...Respondents

¶243

¶244

Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6) and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years of service on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021.

¶245

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶246

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in'the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits in terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal of the writ petition.

¶247

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

¶248

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

¶249

WRIT PETITION NO: 21609 OF 2022

¶250

Between:

¶251

Ch.Sesha Rao, S/o Ch.Venkaiah, aged about 58 years.

¶252

Smt.P.Nirmala, W/o Elisha, aged about 58 years.

¶253

N.Prasad, S/o Devid, aged about 56 years.

¶254

Smt.K.Swaroopa Rani, W/o Prakasham, aged about 58 years.

¶255

T.V.Vasantha Rao, S/o Anjaiah, aged about 58 years.

¶256

Smt.M.Kondamma, W/o Nagar, aged about 58 years.

¶257

M.Ajit Kumar, S/o Devaraju, aged about 58 years.

¶258

P.Venkateswar Rao, S/o Krishna, aged about 64 years.

¶259

Smt.N.Vijaya Rani, W/o Joseph, aged about 53 years.

¶260

Ch.Samuel, S/o Aseervadam, aged about 53 years. 11. Smt.P.Nageswaramma, W/o Ramaswamy, aged about 53 years. 12. Smt.P.Durga, W/o Pandaiah, aged about 60 years. (All are

¶261

working as Field Assistant/Tech.Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh)

¶262

...Petitioners

¶263

AND

¶264

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture and Co.operation (H and S) Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶265

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary,^Finance Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶266

The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh Guntur.

¶267

The Joint Director of Sericulture, Visakhapatnam District.

¶268

...Respondents

¶269

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may

¶270

be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in not granting retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to regularization of petitioner service for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 as followed by the combined Hon'ble AP High Court in WP No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6) and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years of service on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court ini;: WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021.

¶271

lA NO: 1 OF 2079

¶272

¶273

41 Hon'ble High Court in WP No.33936/2011 & batch dt.^{2.5.2018Reportedin} 2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt.^{6.11.2020andWA} No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal of the writ petition.

¶274

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

¶275

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

¶276

WRIT PETITION NO: 21677 OF 2022

¶277

Between:

¶278

G.Ramalinga Reddy S/o G.P.Narsimha Reddy,

¶279

aged about S6 years.

¶280

G.Ahandakumar S/o G.Anand, aged about 60 years.

¶281

P.Obula Reddy S/o P.Ramaiah, aged about 55 years.

¶282

B.Srinivasulu S/o Satyanarayanappa, aged about 57 years. 5. Smt.C.Varalakshmi W/o Late C.Sivaiah, aged about 57 years.

¶283

Smt.B.Krishna Veni W/o Late B.Radhakrishna, aged^about55 years.

¶284

K.KriShna Murthy S/o K.Venkatappa, aged about 59 years.

¶285

C.Adinarayana Reddy S/o Ranga Reddy, aged about 56 years

¶286

Smt. H.K.Vijayalakshmi'W/o T.Niyazullah, aged about 56 years. 10. P.Gangulappa, S/o P.Kadirappa, aged about 60 years. 11. G.Chandrasekhar S/o G.Ch.Buddanna, aged 60 years. 12. C.Nagaraju S/o C.Pullanna, aged about 60 years. 13. P.Inayatullah S/o Allah Baksh, aged about 54 years.

¶287

M.Suryanarayana S/o Subbanna, aged about 59 years. 15. D.Hanumantha Reddy S/o D.Rami Reddy, aged 60 years. 16. P.Ghani Khan S/o Ghouse Khan, aged about 60 years. 17. S.Mahaboob Basha S/o Modhin Saheb, aged about 57 years. 18. V.Bava Fakruddin S/o Bavaiah, aged about 54 years. 19. R.Chandrasekhar S/o Krishnappa, aged about 53 years. 20. G.Sambashiva S/o Sai Prasad, aged about 53 years. 21. S.Narayana S/o Ramanna, aged about 54 years.

¶288

Smt.B.Saroja W/o Late B.Lakshminarayana, aged about 53 years. 23. G.Reddeppa Reddy S/o G.Venkat Reddy, aged about 54 years.

¶289

¶290

P.Nagamallu S/o P.Gangulappa, aged about 57 years.

¶291

Smt.P.Kamalamma W/o P.Nagamallu, aged about 53^years. 26. S.Baba Fakuruddin S/o Khadarvalli, aged about 58^years.

¶292

Smt.B.Anjanamma W/o Santappa, aged about 58 years. 28. Smt.B.Kanthamma W/o Chinna Appalla, aged about^60years.

¶293

P.Sudhakar S/o Ganganna, aged about 60 years. 30. P.Srinivasulu S/o P.Pedda Obulesu, aged about 57^years. 31. B.Venkataramana S/o Narayana, aged about 54 years. 32. T.Chandrasekhar S/o T.N.Ramu, aged 54 years. 33. S.Anjanappa S/o Uttappa, aged about 60 years. 34. Smt.M.Venkataramanamma W/o Ganganna, aged about 59 years 35. S.B.Mahabub Basha S/o Nanne Sab, aged about 56 years. 36. T.Srinivasulu S/o T.Krishnanna, aged about 58 years. 37. Smt.G.Venkata Narasamma W/o Jayaraj, aged about 56 years. 38. Smt.A.Mary D/o Late Joseph, aged about 59 years. 39. ^.Moddin Sab S/o Rehman Sab, aged bout 56 years. 40. Smt.G.Venkatalakshmamma W/o Late Krishna Murthy, aged⁵⁶ 41. M.Narayana Swamy S/o Narayana, aged about 53 years. 42. P.SreeramuluS/o Mandanna, aged about 60 years. 43. S. Ourangajub S/o Khareem Sab, aged about 58 years. 44. M.N.Bhaskar Reddy S/o Narayan Reddy, aged about^58years. 45. S.Nageswaraiah S/o Chenchanna, aged about 56 years. 46. Y.Srinivasulu S/o Y.Chinna Nagappa, aged about 57 years. 47. D.Eswaraiah S/o Sanjappa, aged about 54 years. 48. K.Adinarayana S/o Kondappa, aged about 60 years. 49. Smt.K.Syamalamma W/o Adinarayana, aged about 58^years. 50. R.Nanji Reddy S/o Narayana Reddy, aged about 60^years. 51. S.Prabhakar S/o Sreeramulu, aged about 53 years. 52. P.Pulla Reddy S/o Narayanappa, aged about 59 years. 53. A.B.Veerabhadraiah S/o Chinna Nagaiah, aged about 59 years. 54. S.Ramesh S/o Narayanappa, aged about 53 years.

2"*^ page

Deponent

Attestor

L.Balakrishna S/o Musalappa, aged about 58 years.

¶299

D.Keshava Reddy S/o Chenna Reddy, aged about 53^years.

¶300

M.Sreenivasulu, S/o Narayanappa, aged about 58^years. 58. P.Masthan Reddy S/o Ndrappa Reddy, aged about 54^years.

¶301

G.Narasimha Reddy, S/o Nagi Reddy, aged about 53^years.

¶302

K.Ramesh Babu S/o Sadasiva Murthy, aged about 54^years.

¶303

K.Narasimhulu S/o Narasappa, aged about 55 years.

¶304

K.Adinarayana S/o Venkatramudu, aged about 56 years.

¶305

V.Ramchandra S/o Nagappa, aged about 54 years.

¶306

B.Nagarjuna S/o Venkatappa, aged about 56 years.

¶307

Smt.E.ObuIamma W/o Narayana Swamy, aged about 59^years.

¶308

Smt.V.Renuka W/o Ramakrishna Rao, aged about 53^years. 67. R.Nagi Reddy S/o Narayana Reddy, aged about 59^years.

¶309

G.Prasad S/o Nagappa, aged about 56 years.

¶310

G.Lakshminarasappa S/o Narasappa, aged about 55^years.

¶311

Smt.N.Jayarryna W/o Narasirnha Murthy, aged about^56years.

¶312

J.Suresh Babu S/o J.Subrahmanyam, aged about 56^years.

¶313

T.Ramana Reddy S/o Uttam Reddy, aged about 54 years.

¶314

C.Mohan S/o C.M.Narasirnha Murthy, aged about 59^years.

¶315

V.V. Raghava Naidu S/o V.Pullaiah Naidu, aged about^60years.

¶316

B.Thimma Reddy S/o Narayana Reddy, aged about 54^years.

¶317

B.Kariyappa S/o Narasppa, aged about 54 years.

¶318

Smt.R.Uma Devi W/o Thippe Swamy, aged about 56^years.

¶319

Smt.B.Lakshmi Devi W/o Rarnachandrappa, aged about^57years.

¶320

L.Nagaraju S/o Lingappa, aged about 57 years. 80. K.Ramanjineyulu S/o K.Gangappa, aged about 60 years.

¶321

K.Thippe Swamy S/o Kariyanna, aged about 58 years.

¶322

A.Venkataramana Reddy S/o A.Subba Reddy, aged about^54yrs

¶323

H.Shankarappa, S/o Hanumantharayappa, aged about^56years.

¶324

¶325

P.Ramanjineyulu S/o P.Papanna, aged about 54 years.

¶326

L.Riyazulia S/o Waheed Sab, aged about 55 years. 86. T.Mudlagiriyappa S/o Pedda Timmappa, aged about 55^years. 87. S.Hanumantha Rayappa S/o S.Hanumappa, aged about 55 years 88. P.Narasimha Reddy S/o Sanjeev Reddy, aged about 60 years.

¶327

K.Aswartha Narayana S/o Nagappa, aged about 54 years. 90. C.S.Mallappa S/o C.Beerappa, aged about 55 years. 91 S.Siddappa S/o Siddappa, aged about 53 years.

¶328

K.Sivappa S/o Mylarappa, aged about 55 years.

¶329

C.NarasimhIu S/o Chandrayappa, aged about 57 years.

¶330

G.Venkatesh S/o Govindappa, aged about 56 years. 95. P.Gopalappa S/o Thimmayya, aged about 55 years.

¶331

G.Nagappa, S/o Gurrappa, aged about 57 years. 97. T.H.Ramanji^eyulu S/o Hanumaiah, aged about 57^years. 98. Smt. N.Subhadra W/o G.V.K.Subbaiah, aged about 56 years. 99. V.Hanumantha Rayappa S/o Sanjeevappa, aged about 56 years

¶332

K.Nagaraju S/o K.Thippanna, aged about 54 years.

¶333

T.Jayaramappa S/o Thimmanna, aged about 54 years.

¶334

N.Chandrappa S/o Narasimhappa, aged about 60 years.

¶335

L.Kariyappa S/o Laxmappa, aged about 54 years.

¶336

R.Narasimha Murthy S/o Hanumanthappa, aged about 56 years.

¶337

B.Sajja Raju S/o Ramakistappa, aged about 56 years.

¶338

P.Lakshminarayana S/o Narsaiah, aged about 57 years.

¶339

B.Govindappa S/o N.Kariyanna, aged about 55 years. 108. P.Vijaykumar S/o P.Madhava Rao, aged about 56 years.

¶340

Smt.N.Lakshmi Bai W/o Anjaneyulu Naik, aged 57 years. 110. Smt.P.Prameelamma W/o Nagi Reddy, aged about 53 years. 111. R.Thimma Reddy S/o Narayana Reddy, aged about 59 years. 112. Smt.K.Ramlakshmamma W/o K.Narayanachary,aged 55 yrs 113. C.Muthappa S/o C.DolIappa, aged about 54 years.

¶341

¶342

¶343

D.Venkataramana S/o Venkatappa, aged about 57^years.

¶344

Smt.R.Ramalakshmamma W/o Nandeesh,:-.aged about^54years. 13/5. Smt.V.Rangamma W/o Sreeramappa, aged about 57^years. 117. S.Srinivasulu S/o Ramadass, aged about 53 years.

¶345

(All are working as Field Assistant/Tech.Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined^Ananthapur District, Andhra Pradesh ) ...Petitioners

¶346

And

¶347

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture &. Co.operation (H&S) Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶348

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶349

The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Guntur.

¶350

The Joint Director of Sericulture, Anantapur District

¶351

...Respondents

¶352

Petition under Article'226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly^one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in not granting retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to regularization of petitioner service for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal

¶353

¶354

No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 as followed by the combined Hon'ble AP High Court in WP No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 <ALT P.6) and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 • Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years of service on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court ini;: WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP ■No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. • 22.1.2021.

¶355

lA NO: 1 OF 2099

¶356

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits in terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP No.33936/2011 & batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in ■2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal of the writ petition.

¶357

^ Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

¶358

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

¶359

WRIT PETITION NO: 21697 OF 2022

¶360

Between:

¶361

B.Ganesh Gowdu, S/o Chinna Baba Gowdu, aged about 59 yrs.

¶362

P.Pandu, S/o Ramaiah, aged about 60 years.

¶363

N.Ramesh Reddy, S/o Veeraiah, aged about 54 years

¶364

S.Reddeppa, S/o Gangaiah, aged about 59 years.

¶365

B.Ramana, S/o B.Nallappa, aged about 60 years.

¶366

N.Anjaneyulu, S/o Seethapathi, aged about 59 years.

¶367

B.Gopal, S/o Mallappa, aged about 52 years.

¶368

T.Anand, S/o Krishna Swamy, aged about 54 years.

¶369

G.Srinivasulu Reddy, S/o Govinda Reddy, aged about 58 years.

¶370

A.V.Subrahmanyam, S/o Venkataswamy Achary, aged 60 yrs 11. V.Shanmugam, S/o Vajravelu Shetty, aged about 59 years. 12. S.Madirubaraja, S/o Sadayappan, aged about 52 years. 13. Sivabala Singam, S/o Soundappan, aged about 54 years. 14. S.Sella Durai, S/o Sengamalai, aged about 58 years. 15. I.Yesunadhan, S/o Irudhayam, aged about 58 years. 16. S.Selvaraj, S/o Sellaiah, aged about 60 years. 17. K.Tamil Selvim, S/o Kandaiah, aged about 54 years. 18. S.Subrahmanyam, S/o Sivanu, aged about 59 years. 19. S.Rajendran, S/o Sivalingam, aged about 56 years. 20. V.Rangappa, S/o Venkatappa, aged about 58 years. 21. K.Jayaram, S/o Munivenkatappa, aged about 53 years. 22. M.Narayana Swamy, S/o Krishnaiah, aged about 59 years. (All are working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh)

¶371

...Petitioners

¶372

AND

¶373

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Special Chief Secretary,’ Agriculture and Co.operation (HandS) Department. Velagapudi.

¶374

Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶375

3
2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Finance
Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶376

The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh,

¶377

Guntur.

¶378

The Joint Director of Sericulture, Chittoor Ditrict District.

¶379

...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in not granting retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to 'regularization of petitioner service for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as heid by the Hon’bie Supreme Court in Civii Appeai No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 as foliowed by the combined Hon'bie AP High Court in WP No.33936/2011 J and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 alt P.6) and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'bie Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 ISi illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years of service on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'bie Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'bie High Court ini WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'bie Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021.

¶380

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶381

¶382

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits in terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP No,33936/2011 and batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon’ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal of the writ petition.

¶383

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

¶384

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

¶385

. WRIT PETITION NO: 21699 OF 2022

¶386

Between:

¶387

E.Aseervadamma, W/o Yespadam, aged about 57 years.

¶388

Smt.T.Padmamma, W/o Ramanaiah, aged about 55 years. 3. B.Venkateswar Reddy, S/o Pichi Reddy, aged about⁵⁵ years.

¶389

B.Masthanaiah, S/o Chinnaiah, aged about 53 years. (All are working as Field Assistant/Tech.Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh)

¶390

...Petitioners

¶391

AND

¶392

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture and Co.operation (H and S) Department, Velagapudi Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶393

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶394

The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh Guntur.

¶395

The Joint Director of Sericulture, Chittoor District. ...Respondents

¶396

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents ini;. ■not granting retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to regularization of petitioner service for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 as followed by the combined Hon'ble A.P. High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6) and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Honble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularization from the date of completion^of5 years of service 'on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court ini WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021.

¶397

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶398

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits i r.n terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal of the writ petition.

¶399

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

¶400

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

¶401

WRIT PETITION NO: 22972 OF 2022

¶402

Between:

¶403

R.Krishnappa, S/o S.Venkatappa, aged about 60 years

¶404

R.Harikumar, S/o T.Ramdass, aged about 56 years,

¶405

M.Nagaraja, S/o M.Thammanna, aged about 57 years.

¶406

D.R.Rajendra S, S/o D.Ramachandraiah Chetty, aged about 60 years, (All are working as Technical Assistants/Field Assistant under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined Chittoor Andhra Pradesh)

¶407

...Petitioners

¶408

AND

¶409

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture and Co.operation (H and S) Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶410

♦

¶411

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶412

The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh Guntur.

¶413

The Joint Director of Sericulture, Chittoor District.

¶414

...Respondents

¶415

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in not granting retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to regularization of petitioner service for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 as followed by the combined Hon'ble AP High Court in WP No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6) and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon’ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularization from the date of completion^of5 years of service on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court ini WP No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt 22.1.2021.

¶416

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶417

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be .pleased to grant leave to the respondent No. 3 in the WP No. 22972 of 2022 • to file counter affidavit on behalf of all the respondents in the writ petition.

¶418

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶419

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary^benefits i ::n terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported .in 2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020 dt. ■27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal of the writ petition.

¶420

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

¶421

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

¶422

WRIT PETITION NO: 28896 OF 2021

¶423

Between:

¶424

Pulibandia Venkateswarlu, S/o Krishnaiah, aged 59 years, Occ. Junior □fsTricr ’ Grama Panchayath Kollipara Mandal, Guntur

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary Guntur^Srict^^ Development Dept. Secretariat, Velagapudi,

¶429

'^'^hra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Finance

¶430

and Planning Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.

¶431

The Commissioner of Panchayat Raj and Rural Development,^Stateof A.P. Suryaraopet. Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶432

. 4. The District Panchayath Officer, Guntur Dist. Guntur.

¶433

...Respondents

¶434

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents herein in not regularising the petitioner's service retrospectively from 25-11-1993 on par with others as illegal arbitrary and discrimination and consequentially the Hon'ble Court may pleased to declare that, the petitioner is also entitled for retrospective regularization from 25-11-1993 on par with others, by extending the benefit of retrospective regulariation as considered in similar case by the Division Bench in W.P.No. 5402/2017, dt. 9.6.2016 and its consequential Government Memo.No. 24200/Est. III/A1/2012; dt. 13.12.2018.

¶435

lA NO: 1 OF 2n?l

¶436

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed i in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated. 17.12.2020 submitted to the 3rd respondent for retrospective regularization as considered in similar cases by the Division Bench in W.P.No. 5402/2017, dt. 9.6.2016 and its consequential Government Memo.No. 24200/Est. HUAI/2012, dt. 13.12.2018 pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

¶437

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M R TAGORE

¶438

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT

¶439

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR FINANCE & PLANING

¶440

WRIT PETITION NO: 16862 OF 2021

¶441

Between:

¶442

Akumalla Moulabee, W/o Y.S.Muneer Basha, Aged about 53 years Occ-AHender (Temp), B.T. College, Rio Bangalore Road, Madanapalle Town, Chittoor District.

¶443

...Petitioner

¶444

AND

¶445

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi,^Amaravathi ' Guntur District.

¶446

The Commissioner of College Education, Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi, at Guntur, Guntur District.

¶447

Besant Theosophicai College, (Founded in 1915 Dr. Annie Besant) Rep. by its Correspondent, Madanapalle 517 325, Chittoor District. ’

¶448

...Respondents

¶449

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or directions more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.1 to 3 to regularize/ absorption the petitioner as attender in the light of the orders .in the W.P No.7588 of 2019 Dt, 04-02-2020 and as per, Hon'ble Supreme Court in 2018 (8) SCC 238 from the date of initial appointment i.e. 19.08.1990 from 30.06.1993 as per the representation dated 30.01.2001 22.03.2003 and 04.01.2012 and 25-02-2020 in the light of the directions i n W.P.No.8299 of 2011 strictly on availability of clear vacancy as on 30.06.1993 itself as illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice and also in violation of articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently to set aside the proceedings of the 2'"'^ respondent Dt. 27-3-

¶450

2021 in the interest of the justice and direct the respondents to regularize/ absorb the petitioner services forthwith.

¶451

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶452

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pass necessary orders to pay the minimum time scale of pay attached to the post of attender from 12.11.1998 keeping in view of the orders granted by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.23742 of 2018 dated 18.07.2018 along with due amount of the salary from 11-062020 to till date, pending disposal of writ petition.

¶453

lA NO: 2 OF 2021

¶454

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned proceedings Dt. 27-03-2021 of the 2nd . respondent and direct the 2"^^ respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for absorption in any of the existence vacancy of offender in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Recall the bailable warrant dated 21-04-2023 passed in WP No. 16862 of 2021 by granting time for filing of detailed counter by the petitioner / respondent no. 3 in the interest of justice.

¶455

Counsel for the Petitioner; SRI G V RAVI

¶456

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - IV

¶457

WRIT PETITION NO: 18832 OF 2021

¶458

¶459

Between;

¶460

Kotaiah, Aged 60 years, Retired

¶461

yVatchman-cum-Sweeper, R/o. Muthapalli Village, Harizanawada Nizampatnam Mandal Guntur District.

¶462

1. Kokkiligadda Suvartha, W/o.(late) Kokkiligadda Samuel, Aged about 50 years, R/o. H.No. 3-17. Mutthupalli Agraharam (V) Harijanawada. Nizampatnam Mandal, Guntur District.

¶463

Kokkiligadda Ramesh, S/o.(late) Kokkiligadda Samuel, Aged about 42 years, R/o. H.No. 3-17. Mutthupalli Agraharam (V) Harijanawada, Nizampatnam Mandal, Guntur District.

¶464

Kondipati Jyothi, W/o. Kondipati Samuel, Aged about 40 years, R/o. H.No. 3-17. Mutthupalli Agraharam (V) Harijanawada’ Nizampatnam Mandal, Guntur District.

¶465

Paidipamula Rani, W/o. P.Nageswara Rao. Aged about 35 years, R/o. H.No. 3-17, Mutthupalli Agraharam (V) Harijanawada’ Nizampatnam Mandal, Guntur District

¶466

Kokkiligadda Nani Babu, S/o.(late) Kokkiligadda Samuel, Aged about 31 years, R/o. H.No. 3-17, Mutthupalli Agraharam (V) Harijanawada, Nizampatnam Mandal, Guntur District.

¶467

Petitioner Nos. 2 to 6 brought on record as LRs. of the deceased 1 A P®'' Order dated 07.12.2022 vide 1 .A.No.2/2021 in WP No. 18832 of 2021 in the petition and affidavit.

¶468

...Petitioner

¶469

¶470

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department, A.P. Secretariat Buildings Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 522503.

¶471

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary Finance and Planning Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Amaravathi, Guntur District, A.P. ’

¶472

The Commissioner, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department Tadepallie, Guntur District.

¶473

The District Panchayat Officer, Guntur District.

¶474

...Respondents

¶475

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in regularising the Petitioner's services with effect from date of issuance of G.O.Ms.No.

¶476

♦

¶477

665, dt. 03.092020 and not from the date when he has completed five years ■ of services i.e., 25.11.1993 in accordance with GO.Ms.No.212 Finance and Planning (FW.PC.III) Department dt.22.4.1994 and the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court for the purpose of pay and pension as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to regularize the services of the Petitioner with effect from the date when he has completed five years of service i.e., with effect from 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pay and pension with all consequential benefits.

¶478

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶479

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be 'Pleased to direct the Respondents to treat the Petitioner as regularized with effect from 25.11.1993 for the purpose of fixation of pay, pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶480

Counsel for the Petitioner; SRI M.SRIKANTH

¶481

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - I Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES -IV

¶482

WRIT PETITION NO: 8768 OF 2021

¶483

Between:

¶484

nf S-'o.Adiseshu, Age 56 years, Occ Office Subordinate O/o.C.T.O Bapatia (Circle Office) Bapatia, Guntur District.

¶485

. 2. N.Srinivasa Singh, S/o.Hanman Singh, Age 55 years, Occ Driver, O/o.C.T.O Sattenepally, Guntur District ^/o-Raghuram Sharma, Age 56 years, Occ Junior

¶486

Assistant, O/o.C.T.O Chilakaluripeta, Guntur District.

¶487

K.Chennakeshavulu, S/o.Chinna Venkateshwarlu, Age 52 years, Occ Office Subordinate, O/o.C.T.O Tenali, Guntur District.

¶488

Ch^Siva Shankara Rao, S/o.Veeraiah, Age 59 years, Occ Office Subordinate, O/o.C.T.O Main Bazar Circle, Guntur District.

¶489

HJp

¶490

M.Veera Raghavaiah, S/o.venkateshwarulu, Age 60 years, Occ Office Subordinate, O/o.C.T.O Bapatia Circle, Guntur District.

¶491

R.Venkateshwarulu, S/o.Venkataramaiah, Age 56 years, Occ Office Subordinate, O/o.C.T.O Bapatia (Circle Office), Bapatia,^{GunturDistrict.}

¶492

P.Mallikarjun Rao, S/o.Venkateshwarlu, Age 63 years,^{OccRetdOffice} Subordinate, R/o.Jayanthanagar 2nd Lane, Flat No.201, JKC College Road, Guntur District.

¶493

N.Sri Haribabu, S/o.Venkateshwarulu, Age 60 years, Occ Office Subordinate, O/o.C.T.O Bradipeta, Guntur District.

¶494

P.Pullaiah, S/o.Lakshmaiah, Age 56 years, Occ Senior Assistant, O/o.C.T.O Narsaraopet (Circle) Narsaraopet, Guntur^District.

¶495

Annam Srinivasa Rao, S/o.Lakshmi Narsimha Rao, Age 58 years, Occ Office Subordinate, O/o.C.T.O Bradipet Circle,^{GunturDistrict.}

¶496

R.Malleswara Rao, S/o.Reddy Thirupathaiah, Age 62 years,^Occ Office Subordinate(Retd), R/o.37-9-774, Rajiv Gandhi Nagar, 9th lane. Bank Colony, Guntur District.

¶497

...Petitioners

¶498

AND

¶499

The State of A.P., Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue(C.T.III) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur^District

¶500

The Chief Commissioner (State Tax), Velagapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶501

The Joint Commissioner (State Tax), Guntur Division, Guntur District.

¶502

...Respondents

¶503

¶504

a) By declaring the entire action of the respondents, particularly the entire action of the 1®' respondent in regularizing^theservice of the petitioners with prospective effect vide GO.Rt,No.615 Revenue CT.III Department, dated 18-7-1995, instead of regularizing their services either from the date of their initial appointment or w.e.f. as on

¶505

completion 5 years of service as on cut of date 25.11.1993 while regularizing the services of others w.e.f. their date of joining vide G.O.Rt No. 3072 Finance Admn.lll Dept. dt. 3.7.2010 by the Govt, is as highly illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and contrary to law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex court in a case between in B.Srinivasulu Vs. Nellore Municipal Corporation in Civil Appeal No.12432 of 2014,Dt 1708-2015 including recent judgment of this Hon'ble court in a case between State of AP and another V/s L.B.M. Krishna reported in 2020 (6) ALD 349 (AP) (DB) as well as orders issued in G.O.Rt No. 3072 Finance (Admn.lll) Dept. dt. 3.7.2010 by the Govt.

¶506

b) And consequently to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for extending the benefit of past service rendered by the petitioners prior to their regularization for purpose of pension and other benefits by duly extending the benefit which was extended to other similarly situated persons in G.O.Rt No. 3072 Finance Admn.lll Dept. dt. 3.7.2010 by the Govt. or alternatively for the purpose of pension and other pensionary benefits in terms of recent Judgment of this Hon'ble court in a case between State of AP and another V/s LB.M. Krishna reported in 2020 (6) ALD 349 (AP) (DB) without reference to the earlier regularization orders passed by the 1st respondent vide GO.Rt.No.615 Revenue (CT.III) Dept., dated 18-71995 by duly keeping in view of recent orders of the Govt., issued in GO.Rt.NO.122 MA UD (G1) Dept., dated 22-3-2021.

¶507

lA NO: 1 OF ?n?i

¶508

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to forthwith extend the benefit of past service rendered by the petitioners prior to their regularization by duly keeping in view of similar benefit that was extended to the similarly situated persons G.O.Rt No. 3072 Finance (Admn.lll) Dept. dt. 3.7.2010 by the

¶509

¶510

Govt., as well as recent Division Bench Judgment of this Hon'ble Court reported in 2020(6) ALD 349 (AP) (DB) i.e.. State of AP and another VS L.B.M Krishna and also taking into consideration of recent orders of the Govt., issued in GO.Rt.N0.122 MA & UD (G1) Dept., dated 22-3-2021.

¶511

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI SANTHAPUR SATYANARAYANA RAO

¶512

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES -1

¶513

WRIT PETITION NO: 13311 OF 2021

¶514

Between:

¶515

B.N.Purnachander Rao, S/o. Nancharaiah, Age 60 years^Occ’ Office Subordinate(Retired), O/o. Tahsildar, Bapatia, Guntur District, R/o. 4-167, S.N.T Agraharam, Bapatia, Guntur District.

¶516

...Petitioner

¶517

AND

¶518

The State, of A.P., Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Dept Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District.

¶519

The District Collector (Revenue), Guntur, Guntur District.

¶520

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tenali, Guntur District.

¶521

The Tashildar, Bapatia, Guntur District.

¶522

...Respondents

¶523

¶524

a) By declaring the entire action of the respondents, in not counting the past service rendered by him in the cadre of Grama SevakA/illage Servant in pursuance of appointment orders issued in

¶525

R.Dis.No.916/87-B dated 18-1-1988 of MRO, Repalle, against a clear vacancy, is as highly illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and contrary to law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex court in a case between in

¶526

¶527

B.Srinivasulu Vs. Nellore Municipal Corporation in Civil Appeal No.12432 of 2014, Dt-17-08-2015 including recent judgment of this Hon'ble court in a case between State of AP and another V/s L.B.M. Krishna reported in 2020 (6) ALD 349 (AP) (DB) as well as orders issued in G.O.Rt No. 3072 Finance (Admn.lll) Dept. dt. 3.7.2010 by the Govt including Division Bench orders dated 19-12-2018 in WP.No. 12572/2017 and batch in the same issue,

¶528

b) And consequently to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for extending the benefit of past service rendered by him in the cadte of Grama Sevak/ Village Servant in pursuance of appointment orders issued in R.Dis.No.916/87-B dated 18-1-1988 of MRO, Repalle, against a clear vacancy, for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits in terms of Division Bench Judgment dated 19-12-2017 in Wp.No.12572/2017 and batch r/w recent Judgment of this Hon'ble court in a case between State of AP and another V/s L.B.M. Krishna reported in 2020 (6) ALD 349 (AP) (DB).

¶529

lA NO: 1 OF 2071

¶530

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed i in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to forthwith extend the benefit of past . service rendered by the petitioner in the cadre of Grama Sevak/ Village Servant in pursuance of appointment orders issued in R.Dis.No.916/87-B dated 18-1-1988 of MRO, Repalle, against a clear vacancy, for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits in terms of Division Bench Judgment dated 19-12-2017 in Wp.No.12572/2017 and batch r/w recent Judgment of this Hon'ble court in a case between State of AP and another V/s L.B.M. Krishna reported in 2020 (6) ALD 349 (AP) (DB).

¶531

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SANTHAPUR

¶532

SATYANARAYANA RAO

¶533

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES -1

¶534

¶535

WRIT PETITION NO: 24419 OF 2020

¶536

Between:

¶537

G.Syarnala Rao, S/o Late Venkanna, aged 57 years, Occ. Panchayath Secretary Gr-1, Veeravally Grama Panchayat, Bapulapadu Mandal Krishna District.

¶538

...Petitioner

¶539

AND

¶540

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayath Raj and Rural Development Dept. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.

¶541

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Finance and Planning Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur^District.

¶542

The Commissioner of Panchayat Raj and Rural Development,^Stateof A.P. Suryaraopet, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶543

The District Panchayath Officer, Krishna Dist., at Mahcilipatnam.

¶544

...Respondents

¶545

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents herein in not regularising the petitioner's service retrospectively^{from25-11-1993} on par with others as illegal arbitrary and discrimination and consequentially the Hon'ble Court may pleased to declare that, the petitioner is entitled for retrospective regularization from 25-11-1993 on par with others by extending the benefit given vide Memo.No.6683/DPR and RD/G3/2016 dated 13-12-2018 and consequential orders passed vide Proc.Re.No.7/A/2019, dated 11-2-2019 following the orders passed in . WP.No.5402/2017, dated 9-6-2017.

¶546

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶547

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be

¶548

'Si

¶549

pleased to direct the respondents herein to consider the petitioner case for retrospective regularization from 25-11-1993 by extending the benefit given vide Memo.No.6683/DPR and RD/G3/2016 dated 13-12-2018 and consequential orders passed vide Proc.Rc.No.7/A/2019, dated 11-2-2019 following the orders passed in WP.No.5402/2017, dated 9-6-2017.

¶550

.Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M R TAGORE

¶551

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT

¶552

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING

¶553

WRIT PETITION NO: 23863 OF 2020

¶554

Between:

¶555

P.Nageswar Reddy, S/o Venkateswar Reddy Age 51 years, Occ; Driver ...Petitioner

¶556

-I ^ and Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi,PrincipalGunturSecretary,District RW and S Dept.^ Khlbna^SIm^ ^ Vijayawada,

¶557

...Respondents

¶558

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the entire action of the respondents, particularly, the entire action of the 1st respondent in regularizing the service of the petitioner in the cadre of driver with prospective effect vide G.O. Rt No. 1126, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development (Estt.ll.A) Dept, dt 4.8.2009, instead of regularizing his . services either from the date of his initial appointment or w.e.f. as on

¶559

completion 5 years of service as on cut of date 25.11.1993 while regularizing the services of others w.e.f. their date of joining vide G.O.Rt No. 3072 Finance (Admn.lll) Dept. dt. 3.7.2010 by the Govt, is as highly illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and contrary to law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex court in a case between in B.Srinivasulu Vs. Nellore Municipal Corporation in Civil Appeal No.12432 of 2014, Dt17-08-2015 including recent judgment of this Hon'ble court in a case between State of AP and another V/s L.B.M. Krishna reported in 2020 (6) ALD 349 (AP) (DB) as well as orders issued in G.O.Rt No. 3072 Finance (Admn.lll) Dept. dt. 3.7.2010 by the Govt. b)And consequently to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for extending the benefit of past service rendered by the petitioner prior to his regularization for all the purpose by duly extending^{thebenefitwhich} was extended to other similarly situated person G.O.Rt.No. 3072 Finance (Admn.lll) Dept. dt. 3.7.2010 by the Govt, or alternatively for the purpose of pension and other pensionary benefits in terms of recent Judgment of this Hon’ble court in a case between State of AP and another V/s L.B.M. Krishna reported in 2020 (6) ALD 349 (AP) (DB) without reference to the earlier orders passed in G.O.Rt No. 1126 PR and RD (Estt.ll.A) Dept. dt. 4.8.2009 of the 1®' respondent.

¶560

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶561

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to forthwith extend the benefit of past service rendered by the petitioner prior to his regularization by duly extending the same benefit that was extended to the similarly situated persons G.O.Rt No. 3072 Finance (Admn.lll) Dept. dt. 3.7.2010 by the Govt, pending disposal of W.P.

¶562

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SANTHAPUR SATYANARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

¶563

¶564

WRIT PETITION NO: 4976 OF 2020

¶565

Between:

¶566

M Venkata Reddy. S/o Gopi Reddy, aged about 54 years, Working as Work Inspector in Tadepally Municipality, Guntur District.

¶567

V.Jesudasu S/o Gopalam, aged about 57 years, Working as Lighter in Tadepally Municipality, Guntur District.

¶568

B.Sreerama Reddy, S/o Narasa Reddy, aged about 53 years. Working

¶569

as Bill Collector in Tadepally Municipality, Guntur District.

¶570

Venkatramaiah, aged about 55 years Working as

¶571

rH Worker in Tadepally Municipality, Guntur District.

¶572

I.Yehoshuva, S/o Immanial, aged about 57 years. Working as PH

¶573

Worker in Tadepally Municipality, Guntur District

¶574

N.China Nagaiah, S/o Peda Nagaiah, aged about 56 years. Working as

¶575

PH Worker in Tadepally Municipality, Guntur District.

¶576

D.Ramanaiah, S/o Lakshmaiah, aged 55 years. Working as Sweeper ini Tadepally Municipality, Guntur District.

¶577

...Petitioners

¶578

AND

¶579

Irimfnklf,? Secretary. Municipal Administration Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Amaravathi, Guntur District. Secretary. F and P

¶580

Distdct ’ Buildings. Velagapudi. Amaravathi, Guntur

¶581

The Commissioner and Director of Municipal Administration , Goratnal,

¶582

Guntur District.

¶583

The Tadepally Municipality, Tadepally, Guntur District rep.by its Commissioner.

¶584

...Respondents

¶585

¶586

years on or before 25.11.1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to regularization of petitioners services for the purpose of pension and .pensionary benefits as held by the combined Hon'ble AP High Court in WP • No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6) is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice.

¶587

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶588

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners for retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary^benefits in terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP No.33936/2011 & batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT P.6 pending final disposal of the writ petition.

¶589

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

¶590

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

¶591

The Court made the following common order:

¶592

¶593

APHC010366622022

¶594

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶595

[3310]

¶596

FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶597

PRESENT

¶598

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO

¶599

WRIT PETITION NOs: 22180, 21579, 21585. 21587, 21588, 21589. 21591. ^597,21604, 21606, 21609, 21^77. 216S7> 21599, 22972 OF 2022, 28896^ 16862, 18832. 8768 and 13311 of 2021, 24419. 23863. 4976 of 2020

¶600

WRIT PETITION NO: 22180 OF 2022

¶601

Between:

¶602

G. Anjaneyulu, and Others

¶603

...PETITIONER{S)

¶604

AND

¶605

The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others

¶606

...RESPONDENT(S)

¶607

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶608

1.K SRINIVASA PRASAD

¶609

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶610

1.GP FOR SERVICES I

¶611

The Court made the follov/ing:

¶612

COMMON ORDER:-

¶613

Since the facts and issue involved in ail the Writ Petitions. I find it expedient to decide these matters by a Common Order. For the sake of convenience, W.P.No.22180 of 2022 is taken as leading^case.

¶614

The case of the petitioners in W.P.No.22180 of 2022 in short is that they were appointed as NMRs in the year 1981 onwards in the 4*^ respondent

¶615

¶616

corporation and they were working without any break.^{Whilethematterstood} thus, the Government issued G.O.Ms.No.11, dated 20.01.2017 have sanctioned 726 posts in the category of Field Assistants in Sericulture Department on supernumerary basis for regularization of services full time contingent employees, who have fulfilled the conditions stipulated in Government orders vide G.O.Ms.No.212, dated 22.04.1994, G.O (P).No.112 dated 23.07.1997 and G.O.Ms.No.11, dated 20.01.2017. Accordingly the Commissioner of Sericulture, Guntur issued proceedings^{dated08.02.2017} has distributed 2970 posts to the Ananthapur District to regularize the fill time contingent employees in the District by giving temporary employment'in the category of Field Assistants. In view of the said G.Os, the services of the petitioners were regularized by appointing them as Field Assistants in Ananthapur District prospectively from the date of^issue of orders without granting retrospective regularization from the date of completion of five years for counting of daily wage service rendered prior to their regularization of services for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits, without monetary benefits, as regularization orders were issued after more than 25 years service rendered by them on NMR basis. Further their probationary period was also declared vide proceedings dated 12.06.2019 and some of the petitioners were promoted as Technical Assistants from the category of Field Assistant vide proceedings dated 26.03.2021. Therefore, the petitioners are entitled retrospective regularization from the date of completion of five years. hence the present writ petitions came to be filed.

¶617

¶618

Heard Mr. K. Srinivasa Prasad, Mr. P. Raghavendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader, Services-I; learned Assistant Government Pleader, Services-ll for the respondents.

¶619

During hearing learned counsel for the petitioners reiterated the contents urged in the writ petitions and placed on record the decision of the Hon’ble Division Bench of the composite High Court at Hyderabad in if Government of A.P rep., by its Principal Secretary, PR and RD Department, Hyderabad and Others v. N. Venkaiah and Others"'', wherein it was held as follows:-

¶620

“53. On the above analysis, the writ petitions are disposed of directing the authorities concerned to extend the benefit of B. Srinivasulu (1 supra) to the employees in this batch of cases by reckoning their services from the date of ' completion of five years in service, on or before 25.11.1993, for the purpose of their pension and pensionary benefits. They shall however not be entitled to actual monetary benefits for the said period, in the form of arrears of pay or allowances."

¶621

So also, the Division Bench of this Court following^{thedecisionofN.} ti Venkaiah’s case (cited supra) in A.P.Bevarages Corporation Limited, Vijayawada, Krishna District v. K. Kesava Narayana Reddy and Others”^, wherein it was held as follows:-

¶622

Following the Division Bench judgment in N. Venkataiah’s ^case (supra), we hold that the services of respondent Nos. 1 to 60/ writ petitioners would be deemed to have been regularized from the cut-off date, i. e 25.11.1993, for the

¶623

‘2018(4) ALT 6 (D.B) ^ 2021(5) ALD 422 (AP) (DB)

¶624

^ 2018(4) ALD 590 (DB)

¶625

¶626

purpose of fixation of pension and pensionary benefits. As held in the aforesaid judgment, respondent Nos. 1 to 60/ writ petitioners^are not to be given any monetary benefits in the form of arrears of pay or otherwise from that date. Respondent Nos. 1 to 60/ writ petitioners will be entitled to salary in terms ofG.O.Ms.No.31. dated 28.02.2017.

¶627

And also, the Division Bench of this Court also followed the decision of N. Venkataiah’s case cited supra in “The State of Andhra Pradesh rep., by its Principal Secretary, Agriculture & Corporation (Sericulture) Department v. T.S.Gopalaiah”^, wherein it was held^asfollows:-

¶628

“12. We are of the considered opinion that ends of justice will be sub-served in the present case by moulding the relief by providing that though the writ petitioners would be deemed to have been regularized^{fromthecut-offdated} i.e 25.11.1993 for the purpose of fixation of pension and pensionary benefits, pension will be made available to them only from the date of filing of the writ petition i.e from 19.02.2020.

¶629

Learned Assistant Government Pleaders for the respondents vehemently opposed to allow the writ petitions.

¶630

Perused the record.

¶631

No doubt, the issue involved in these writ petitions are squarely covered by an order of this Court as cited supra, where^under this Court passed several orders by following the decision of Hon’ble Apex Court and also the Government issued G.Os by granting retrospective regularizationfor the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits for the service rendered prior to regularization of their services. It is further contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that in similar circumstances the Government

¶632

" W.A.No.483, 2021, dated 05.08.2021

¶633

issued G.O.Rt.No.664, dated 10.07.2018 granting relief of retrospective regularization in the case of employees working in Tirupati Muncipal Corporation. The Government also issued another G.O.Ms.No.8, Water Resources Department, dated 10.02.2020 extending the similar benefit to the employees working in irrigation department and that the petitioners in this writ petition also seeking similar relief for the said benefit.

¶634

Therefore, keeping in view of the ratio laid down by this Court in the decisions cited supra, directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioners with effect from the date of their completing their five year continuous service, on or before 25.11.1993 retrospectively for the purposes of their pension and pensionary benefits. They shall however not be entitled to actual monetary benefits for the said period, in the form of arrears of pay or allowances. The same order shall be applied in other writ petitioners in this batch writ petitions also.

¶635

With the above direction, all the writ petitions are disposed of by a Common Order. It is made clear that the directions contained in this order shall be implemented within three (03) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶636

The miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall^{alsostandclosed.}

¶637

To,

¶638

Sd/-K.SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// seotIon officer

¶639

¶640

^ Andh^TpradlfhTprm;'^TQ'''5^^"’'"'®'''®*'°" Department,^Stateof District. ’ Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur

¶641

The Principal Secretary, Finance and Planning Department,^Stateof Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶642

The Principal Secretary Revenue(C.T.III) Department, State of A.P., Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District.

¶643

The Special Chief Secretary, State of Andhra Pradesh, Agriculture and Co.operation (H and S) Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶644

The Commissioner and Director of Municipal Administration, Goratnal, Guntur District.

¶645

The Commissioner, Tadepally Municipality, Tadepally,^{GunturDistrict.}

¶646

The Principal Secretary, RW and S Dept., Govt, of A.P., Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District.

¶647

The Engineer-in- Chief, RWS and S Dept. Gollapudi, Vijayawada Krishna District.

¶648

The Superintending Engineer, RWS and S Circle office, ZP Compound Guntur, Guntur District,

¶649

n * Secretary, Panchayath Raj and Rural Development D^trict Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur

¶650

o* * Commissioner of Panchayat Raj and Rural Development State of A.P. Suryaraopet, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶651

The District Panchayath Officer, Krishna Dist., at Mahcilipatnam. 13. The District Collector (Revenue), Guntur, Guntur District. 14. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tenali, Guntur District. 15. The Tashildar, Bapatia, Guntur District. 16. The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Guntur.

¶652

The Chief Commissioner (State Tax), Velagapudi, Vijayawada Krishna District.

¶653

The Joint Commissioner (State Tax), Guntur Division,^Guntur District.

¶654

nonor+I*?® Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department Tadepallie Gurntu District

¶655

The District Panchayat Officer, Guntur District.

¶656

A wh Secretary, Higher Education Department, State of
□She? Sscfetariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur
22. A The Commissioner of College Education, Andhra Pradesh . at
Amaravathi, at Guntur, Guntur District.
23.
Correspondent, Besant Theosophical College, (Founded in
1915 Dr. Annie Besant), Madanapalle 517 325, Chittoor District.
24. The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra
Pradesh, Guntur.
25. The Joint Director of Sericulture, Visakhapatnam District.
26. The Joint Director of Sericulture, Chittoor, Chittoor District.
27. The Joint Director of Sericulture, Ananthapuramu
Ananthapuramu District.
28. The Assistant Director of Sericulture, Penukonda
Ananthapuramu District.
29. The Assistant Director of Sericulture, Kadiri, Ananthapuramu
District.
30. The Assistant Director of Sericulture, MFTU, Ananthapuramu
Ananthapuramu District.
31. MpnH Assistant Director of Sericulture, Tadakalapalli, Madakasira
Mandal, Ananthapuramu District (presently Satya sai District)
32.One CC to Sri K Srinivasa Prasad, Advocate [OPUC]
?4 nn^ rr 1° I''* o [^,^9h^''®ndra Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]
34.0ne CC to Sri G V Ravi, Advocate [OPUC] ^
35.One CC to Sri M R Tagore, Advocate [OPIJC]
37 nnf rr f ^a^Vanarayana Rao, Advocate [OPUC]
37.0ne CC to Sri M Srikanth, Advocate [OPUC]
■ IItwo rr= S r D1°' High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
• 40 Two CCS n rp t! f ; HiSh Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
41 Two rr! no! - II, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
Andhra Pradesh [OUT] ''' ^ ^>9^ Court of
''S CoSrt^ofrndl^rrplr'hJotTf^^*"" "

43.Two CD Copies RAM

HIGH COURT

DATED:23/08/2024

COMMON ORDER

WRIT PETITION Nos: 22f80. 21579, 2t585. 21587, 21.588. 21589. 21591. 21597. 216M. 21606. 21809, 21677, 21697, 21699. 22972 of 20??; 16862, 18832, 8758 and 13311 of 2021: 24419, 23863, 4976 of 2020:

¶662

m
i 2 - SEP 202't
i^yt •^A

¶663

DISPOSING ALL THE WPs WITHOUT COSTS

R.Krishnappa v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Krishnappa v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Palaparthi Kiran Kumar, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

P Chandrasen Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

V.Mohan Reddy, Vs The Commissioner, Endowments Department

G.v.Sashirekha W/o G.S.K.Appa Rao, Vs The Assistant Commissioner (Endowments Department)

G v Rangaiah Vs the State of Ap

K Gangaraju Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh