Writ petition challenging selection of a fair price shop dealer was dismissed as infructuous after counsel represented the relief had become infructuous; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVA (Special Original Jurisdiction) //
THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE B. S. BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION NO: 21942 OF 2017
Between: Smt. L.R. Mangalakshmi, W/o. L.N. Rajendrin, aged about 43 years, R/o. Brahmadevara Chendiu Village, H/o. Kangundhi, Kuppam Mandal, Chittoor District. ...Petitioner
AND
...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3'^^ respondent in not fillowing the G.O.Ms.No.4 dated 19.02.2011 issuing proceedings ROC/A3/164/2017, selecting the 5*'^ respondent as successfulcandidateas a dealer for Fair Price Shop No.51 of Brahmadevara Chendiu Village, H/o. Kangundhi, Kuppam Mandal, Chittoor District is illegal, arbitrary and in
(I
ftIA
violation of principles of natural justice, and consequentlysetasidethe same.
LA. NO: 1 OF 2017rWPMP. NO: 27022 OF 2017)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings Roc/A3/164/2017 issud by the 3 rd respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI C. PRAKASH
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: ORDER
r
APHC010346792017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3311]
MONDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 21942/2017
Between:
Smt. L.R. Mangalakshmi
...PETITIONER
AND
The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal ...RESPONDENT(S) Secretary and others
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.PRAKASH C
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of theConstitutionof Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the India praying to issue a the G.O.Ms.No.4 dated 19.02.2011 3rd respondent in not following issuing proceedings Roc/A3/16412017, selecting the5threspondentas dealer for Fair Price Shop No.51 of successful candidate as a BrahmadevaraChendiuVillage, H/o. Kangundhi, Kuppam Mandal,
2
WP No.21942 of 2017
Chittoor District is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice, and consequently set aside the same.
- The learned counsel for the petitioner represented that the relief has become infructuous.
- Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/-B.PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
MR
r
V.
HIGH COURT BSB J DATED: 04/11/2024
ORDER WP.No.21942of 2017
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. L.R. Mangalakshmi
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Consumer Affairs, Food & Civil Supplies Department
The District Collector, Chittoor District
The Sub Collector/Revenue Divisional Officer, Madanapalli
The Tahsildar, Kuppam Mandal
Chinna Tayee
B. S. Bhanumathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
