Writ petition challenging cancellation of petitioner's sub-canteen licence and blacklisting by a devasthanam. Respondent authorities submitted the petitioner had died and the auction had been conducted; counsel for petitioner did not refute. The writ petition was closed with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3310]
APHC010473672015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 21328/2015
Between:
K. Sathibabu,
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.G V SHIVAJI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.T BALAJI
2.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP)
3.ELEVATED AS JUDGE
The Court made the following Order:
The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
seeking the following relief:
“…. . to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the 2nd Respondent in issuing Impugned Memo No.B1/12271/2015, dated 26-062015 and consequential proceedings issued by the 3rd Respondent in R.C.No.C1/4039/2014, dated 01-07-2015 wherein the license of the petitioner has been cancelled in respect of Sub-Canteen situated on the Hills of 3rd Respondents Devastanam and further blacklisting the
2
petitioner as highly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Act 14 of the Constitution of India apart from violative of principles of Natural Justice …….”
__________________________ Dr. K. MANMADHA RAO, J
BMS
2 provisions across 1 enactments
K. Sathibabu
The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Others
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
