The petitioner's counsel submitted that the cause of action in the writ petition had ceased to exist. The Court recorded the submission and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous without ordering costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 19399 OF 2012
Between:
Chitteti Ramaiah s/o China Kasaiah occ; Agriculture, r/o Mallapalem village Pullalacheruvu Mandal, Prakasam District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature writ of Mandamus, to declare the impugned order bearing D.Dis. No. A7/2777/2012 -Adm. Dt. 1-6-2012 passed by the 1 St respondent wherein the
auction held on 9-5-2012 and 10-5-2012 vetoed without assigning any reason as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust, and consequently set aside the same by directing the respondents herein to obtaintheleasedeedfromthe petitioner as per rules, and to grant each other reliefor reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper the circumstancesofthecase.
I.A, NO: 2 OF 2012(WPMP. NO: 26573 OF 2012)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased amend the Survey Number as Sy.No. 115 admeasuring Ac18.^'-]'^'^ cents in the place of Sy.No.15, admeasuring Ac. 18.65centswherever it is mentioned including the interim prayer and the order passed in W.P.M.P.No.24850 of 2012 in W.P.No.19399 of 2012 dt.4-7-2012, in the interest of justice. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP. NO: 13546 OF 2013) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders for extension of the agricultural years granted in W.P.M.P.No.24850 of 2012 in W.P.No.19399 of 2012 dt.4-7-2012 for further two agricultural years i.e., 2013-2014 and 2014-2015, pending disposal of the main W.P. No.19399 of 2012, in the interest of justice.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP. NO: 24850 OF 2012)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the, affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the impugned order of the 1®' respondent bearing D.Dis.No.A7/2777/2012-Adm. Dt. 1.6.2012 including re-auction in so far the land admeasuring Ac. 18.75
cents in Sy.No.115 situated at Mallepalem village, Puiiacheruvu Mandal, Prakasam District is concerned, pending disposal ofthemainWritPetition.
(Sy.No. is impleaded as per C.O.dt.9/7/12 in WP.MP.26573/12)
Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT K.ARUNA
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI V.T.M.PRASAD SCFOR
ENDOWNMENTS
The Court made the following: ORDER
if
APHC010178292012
% N \
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
[3310]
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 19399/2012
Between:
Chitteti Ramaiah S/o China Kasaiah,
...PETITIONER
AND
The Assistant Commissioner Endowments and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.KARUNA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
2.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
The Court made the following Order:
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.K.Aruna,learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the cause in the present writ petition does not survive, and it has become infructuous.
- Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as Infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
2
- As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand
closed.
Sd/- A VENU GOPALA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
\
//TRUE COPY//
SECfl^N OFFICER
To,
MBT
HIGH COURT
DATED:10/09/2024
ORDER
WP.No.19399 of 2012
DISMISSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS
WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition had survived or become infructuous?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Chitteti Ramaiah
The Assistant Commissioner (Endowments), Ongole
The Inspector, Endowments Department, Markapuram
The Manager, Sri Chennakesava Swamy Temple Venkatadripalem
K MANMADHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
