This single-paragraph order dismisses a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 151 CPC as infructuous. No findings were recorded on the merits of the petition challenging the non-registration of a complaint by police respondents.
None
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 18732 OF 2024
Between:
P. Varalakshmi, W/o Nagula Mandadi, Aged. 49 years, Occ. House Wife, Vallivedu, Venkatagiri Mandal, Tirupathi District. ...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th and 5th respondents to registerthe complaint and investigate the same to recover the money transferred to the 6th respondent and take necessary action on the 6th and 7th respondents.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D KISHORE KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5: GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 & 7: None appeared
The Court made the following order:
APHC010368042024 IN THE high court of ANDHRA PRADESH [33681 at ANIARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
V L N CHAKRAVARTHI THE honourable SRI JUSTICE B WRIT PPTITinM NO: 18732/2024
Between;
...PETITIONER
p Varalakshmi
AND
...RESPONDENT(S) Andhra Pradesh and Others The State Of
Counsel for the Petitioner; 1.D KISHORE KUMAR
the Respondent(S); Counsel for 1.GP FOR HOME
made the following order; The Court
the Constitution of under Article 227 of This Writ Petition
,
India is filed for the following relief
particularly direction more writ, order or to issue a Mandamus declaring the one inin the nature of Writ of in not and 5th respondents of the 4th action registering the compiaint lodged on 24 05 2024 is as of natural violation of principles illegal arbitrary and 14 and 21 of Constitution violation of Articles justice
2
of India and consequently direct the 4th and 5th respondents to register the complaint and investigate the same to recover the money transferred to the 6th respondent and take necessary action on the 6th and 7th respondents and pass such...”
- Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the State is present.
- Recording the submission made by learned counsel forthe petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no orders as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any
pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
Sd/- K J RAJA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// mrSECTION OFFICER
To,
GVN WP(S)
HIGH COURT
DATED:11/09/2024
ORDER
WP.No.18732 of 2024
5 10 MAR 2025 g
. Current Section .
DISMISSING THE WP
AS INFRUCTUOUS
WITHOUT COSTS
P. Varalakshmi
The State of Andhra Pradesh
The Director General of Police, Mangalagiri
The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati District
The Circle Inspector /Station House Officer, Venkatagiri Circle
The Sub-Inspector of Police, Venkatagiri Police Station
B V L N Chakravarti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
