Writ petition dismissed as infructuous after counsel submitted the cause no longer survived for adjudication. No order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010011342013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3329]
FRIDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 17790/2013
Between:
P. Pratap Reddy, and Others
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
The Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITON NO.17790 OF 2013
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for
the respondents.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
__________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
20.12.2024
BSP
135
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO.17790 of 2013
20.12.2024
BSP
P. Pratap Reddy
The Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
