in 4"' Respondent, thought the petitioner is entitled to be in age of 62 in 31.01.2025 thereby considering the service upto 62 years i.e., till G.O.Ms.No.15 Finance (HR-1V-FR& LR) amendment made vide Department dated 31.01.2022 and Rule 28(7) of the Andhra Pradesh Coafter the 4^^ Respondent passing operative Societies Rules, 1964, even Resolutions dated 08.11.2022 and 17.06.2023 therebyincreasingthe to its employees, as illegal. age of the retirement from 60 to 62 years the principles of natural justice, Nwithout any arbitrary and contrary to Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Article 14 jurisdiction, violative of of India and contrary to the provisions of the and 21 of the Constitution Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 and Rules made direct respondents to continue petitioner therein and consequently service till the age of 62 years and pass such other order or orders ... Chief Executive Officer of respondent No.4, 2. The petitioner, working as dated 17.05.2023 (Ex.P1), extending the age Society, despite the resolution was sought to be superannuated of superannuation from 60 years to 62 years the dismissal order passed in on attaining the age of 60 years, in view on W.P.No.17128 of 2023. W.P.No.17128 of 2023 assailing the 3. Earlier, the petitioner filed of superannuation to 62 years. In respondents' action in not extending the age about the resolution passed by the the affidavit, the petitioner asserted not filed before this Court. Society. However, a copy of the resolution was Hence, the said writ petition was dismissed by thecommonorderdated 06.05.2024. terminated the petitioner's service because 4. Later the person-in-charge of the common order dated 06.05.2024. Given the subsequent developments ice the above writ petition is filed. i.e. termination of the petitioner from service 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Assistant Government and 2 and Sri Srinivas Basava, learned Pleader for Services for respondents 1 counsel for respondent No.3.
