Allowed

Sri Banala Sudharshanam v. the State of Ap

Andhra Pradesh HC2 Sept 2024WP/14703/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society employee challenged his proposed superannuation at 60 years despite a General Body resolution extending retirement to 62 years under amended rules. The High Court held the issue squarely covered by its earlier batch order in W.P.No.3255 of 2023 and disposed of the petition accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be continued in service till age 62 in terms of the common order dated 06.05.2024 in W.P.No.3255 of 2023 and batch; no costs.

Sri Banala Sudharshanam Vs the State of Ap — Cooperative Societies | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

_X
TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
tir f
o
PRESENT
*
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATT^^^

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO: 14703 OF 2023

¶4

Between:

¶5

Sri Banala Sudharshanam, S/o. Banala Yerranna, Occ. Chief Executive Officer (CEO), aged about 60 years, R/o. H.No.6-111, Nagaladinne Nandavaram Mandalam, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh

¶6

...Petitioner AND

¶7

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Agriculture Department, Secretariat, Amaravathi, Guntur District

¶8

Andhra Pradesh.

¶9

The Commissioner and Registrar of Cooperative Societies Guntur Andhra Pradesh.

¶10

The District Cooperative Officer, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh.

¶11

Primary Agricultural Cooperative, Credit Society

¶12

No.Y-4117 rep. by its Chair-Person of Person -Incharge Committee Nandavaram Village and Mandal, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh ’

¶13

...Respondents

¶14

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to issue of an appropriate Writ, Order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 and 3 authorities in trying to prevent the petitioner to be in service upto age of 62 in 4th Respondent, even after passing resolution dated 31.03.2023 by the 4th Respondent and further informing the petitioner that he would be superannuated from 31.07.2023, thought the petitioner is entitled to be service upto 62 years i.e., till 31.07.2025 thereby considering the amendment made vide G.O.Ms.No.15 Finance

¶15

(HR-IV-FR and LR) Department dated 31.01.2022 and Rule 28 (7) of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Rules 1964 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the principles of natural justice, without any juridiction, violative of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 and Rules made therein and consequently direct respondents to continue petitioner service till 62 years.

¶16

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶17

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the service of the petitioner upto age of 62 years, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT BOBBA VIJAYALAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 3: GP FOR SERVICES - I Counsel for the Respondent No.4: NONE

¶19

The Court made the following order:

¶20

APHC010286432023

¶21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶22

[3331]

¶23

TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶24

PRESENT

¶25

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI

¶26

WRIT PETITION NO: 14703/2023

¶27

Between:

¶28

Sri Banala Sudharshanam ...PETITIONER

¶29

AND

¶30

The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)

¶31

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶32

BOBBA VIJAYALAKSHMI

¶33

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶34

1.GP FOR SERVICES I

¶35

The Court made the following:

¶36

:: ORDER ::

¶37

The above writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

¶38

India seeking the following relief:

¶39

“...for issuance of an appropriate Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 and 3 authorities in trying to prevent the petitioner^to beⁱⁿ service upto age of 62 in 4’^ Respondent even after passing resolution^{dated31.03.2023} by the 4'^ Respondent and further informing the petitioner^{thathewouldbe} superannuated from 31.07.2023, thought the petitioner is entitled to be

¶40

Page 2 of 4

¶41

SRS, J W.P.No.14703 of 2023

¶42

service up to 62 years i.e. till 31.07.2025 thereby considering the amendment made vide G.O.Ms.No.15 Finance (HR-IV-FR &LR) Department dated 31.01.2022 and Rule 28 (7) of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative^Societies Rules 1964, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the principles of natural justice without any jurisdiction, violative of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act 1964 and Rules made therein and consequently direct respondents to continue petitioner service till 62 years and pass such other or further^orders ...”

¶43

Heard Sri Srinivas Basava, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services appeared for respondents 1 to 3. Notice of respondent No.4 is dispensed with" because of the filing of General Body Resolution dated 31.03.2024 as Exhibit P.1.

¶44

At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention^of this Court to the General body resolution dated 31.03.2024 passed by respondent No.4, whereby it was resolved to extend the age of superannuation from 60 years to 62 years and also the common order passed in W.P.No.3255 of 2023 and batch, dated 06.05.2024.

¶45

Learned Single Judge of this Court by a common judgment in W.P.No.3255 of 2023 and batch, upheld the power of society to enhance the age of superannuation from 60 to 62 years as per Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act and the Rules made there under. The issue involved in the writ petition is squarely covered by order in W.P.No.3255 of 2023 and batch. In fact, pursuant to the common order, by following the same, writ petitions were disposed of at the admission stage.

¶46

¶47

Page 3 of 4

¶48

SRS, J W.P.No.14703 of 2023

¶49

Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is allowed in terms of the common order dated 06.05.2024 in W.P.No.3255 of 2023 and batch. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶50

The Registry is directed to attach a copy of the order dated 06.05.2024 in W.P.No.3255 of 2023 and batch and batch to this order.

¶51

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any,^{shallstandclosed.}

¶52

SDI- K.SRINIVASA RAJU assistant registrar //TRUE COPY//

¶53

To SECTION OFFICER State Si Co-operation Department, Afidhra^Pradesh^'^^'^®*^’ Amaravathi, Guntur District, Anl'JaPrall"®'^ Registrar of Cooperative Societies,^Guntur,

¶54

SECTION OFFICER

¶55

The District Cooperative Officer, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh.

¶56

The Chair-Person of Person -Incharge Committee, Nandavaram Primary Agricultural Cooperative, Credit Society, No.Y-4117 Nandavaram Village and Mandal, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh

¶57

One CC to Smt Bobba Vijayalakshmi, Advocate [OPUC]

¶58

Two CCs to GP for Services - I High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

¶59

Two CD Copies batch® ^ 06 05.2024 in WP.No.3255 of 2023 and RAM

HIGH COURT

DATED;03/09/2024

ORDER

WP.No.14703 of 2023

2 5 SEP 2021! S
.09,
^ Current Section . ^

¶65

ALLOWING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS

¶66

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

¶67

W.P.Nos.3255, 3281, 8593, 9135, 15259, 15269, 15286,15927,17128,18931,18938, 25433, 27678, 27728, 32722 & 33335 of 2023; 153, 924, 965, 1635, 1962, 2448, 2461, 3529 & 4781 of 2024

¶68

COMMON ORDER IN W.P.Nos.15259, 15269, 15286, 15927, 18938. 25433. 27678, 27728, 32722. 33335 of 2023 and 153. 1962. 2448. 2461, 3529 and 4781 of 2024:

¶69

Heard Sri Kambampati Ramesh Babu, Sri N. Siva Reddy, Sri Srinivas Basava representing Smt. Bobba Vijaya Lakshmi learned respective Counsels for the Writ Petitioners^inthisbatch and Sri P. Vara Prasad, learned Asst. Government Pleader representing the Principal Secretary, Agriculture and Cooperative Department and the District Cooperative Officer.

¶70

This batch of Writ Petitions is filed by the employees working at various levels in the Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Societies in the State of Andhra Pradesh for seeking enhancement of age of superannuation from 60 years to 62 years as per the amendment made by the Government vide G.O.Ms.No.15 dated 31.01.2022. This amendment is made by the Government of Andhra Pradesh and is called as the Andhra Pradesh Public Employment (Regulation of Age of Superannuation) (Amendment) Ordinance 2022. This Ordinance

¶71

¶72

was later approved by the State Legislature and eventually became an Act (Act No.4 of 2022) vide Gazette Notification^No.4 dated 19.04.2022. Vide the Act No.4 of 2022, the Andhra Pradesh Public Employment (Regulation of Age of Superannuation) Act, 1984 has been amended, enhancing the age of superannuation for the employees working in the Government Departments from 60 years to 62 years.

¶73

The contention of the Writ Petitioners in these cases is that the age of superannuation which applies to the employees of the Government shall, ipso facto, apply to the employees working in the Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Societies in the State of Andhra Pradesh as per the provisions of the^Statute namely the Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 (Act No.7 of 1964) and the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Rules,^1964.

¶74

Even though various submissions were advanced by various learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners, broadly the contentious issue that had fallen for consideration before this Court is:

¶75

Whether the benefit of Andhra Pradesh Public Employment (Regulation of Age of Superannuation) (Amendment) Act, 2022 (Act No.4 of 2022) is available^to the employees working in the Primary Agricultural

¶76

¶77

Cooperative Credit Societies in the State of Andhra Pradesh in terms of the Cooperative Societies Act,¹⁹⁶⁴ and its Rules?

¶78

COUNSEL FOR THE WRIT PETITIONERS:

¶79

The learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners have taken this Court through the provisions of the above mentioned^Statute and the Rules. There is no dispute that the State of^Andhra Pradesh has made amendments in respect of extention of age of superannuation to its employees from 60 years to 62 years vide Act No.4 of 2022. Therefore, this Court has to see whether^this benefit of extention of age of superannuation arising^outofthis Act 4 of 2022 would apply to the employees working in the Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Societies or^not. It would be necessary to examine the relevant provisions of^ActNo.7of 1964 along with Rules as amended from time to time.

¶80

Act No.7 of 1964 was enacted by the Parliament to consolidate and amend the law relating to the Cooperative Societies in the State of Andhra Pradesh based on Cooperative Principles and Cooperative identity. The Respondent Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Societies in the instant^caseare the Registered Societies under the Act No.7 of 1964. Chapter Xlll-B (titled as “Special Provisions Applicable to Cooperative

¶81

¶82

Credit Societies Identified Under Revival Package)^wasinserted and was brought into effect by making necessary amendments vide Act 16 of 2007. By virtue of this amendment, new provisions, namely Sections 115-C & 115-D were added and brought into effect. These are called the ‘Special^{Provisions’and} are applicable to Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Societies. Under Section 30 (1) of the Act No.7 of 1964, “the ultimate authority of a Society shall vest in the General Body”. Clause-(xxiii) of Sub-section (2) of Section 30 would stipulate that the “approval of the staffing pattern, pay and other^allowancesof the employees of the society and contingencies,” is^alsovestedin the General Body. Rules 28 of the A.P Cooperative Societies Rules, 1964 deal with appointments, functions of the^officersand servants of the societies. Clause (b) of Sub-rule (4)^ofRule28 stipulates that General Body, on the recommendation of the Managing Committee, is competent to revise the Service^Rulesor Pay Scales provided that the expenditure towards pay and allowances of the employees is less than 2% of the working capital or less than 30% of the Gross Profit under^{‘intimation’to} the Registrar of Cooperative Societies. Clause (c)^ofSub-Rule4 of Rule 28 stipulates that Societies, except Societies^mentioned under Sections 115-C & 115-D of the A.P Cooperative^Societies

¶83

¶84

Act, 1964, which are in receipt of State aid shall not frame any Rules relating to age of retirement, leave rules, leave travel concession and rules relating to loans to employees^which shall be in excess of the subsisting rules of Government concerning these matters.

¶85

Clause (d) of Sub-rule (4) of Rule 28 states that^the Societies covered under Section 115-C & 115-D of the A.P Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 may decide on the age of superannuation of their employees and such age of superannuation shall not be in excess of subsisting rules governing the superannuation of the Government employees.

¶86

Sub-Rule (7) of Rule 28 (as amended on 04.02.2019) would also indicate that every paid servant and officer^ofthe Societies mentioned in Sections 115-C & 115-D of the Act No.7 of 1964 are exempted from Rule 28(6) and that every paid^servant and officer of the Societies shall retire from service on attaining such age that is not in excess of the subsisting rules governing the age of superannuation of the Government employees.

¶87

Rule 28 of the A.P Cooperative Societies Act, 1964^as amended from time to time is extracted hereunder:-

¶88

'28. Officers and servants of societies:-

¶89

¶90

(1) No Society shall appoint any person as its paid^officer or servant in any category of service, unless he possesses the qualifications and furnished the security as specified by the Registrar, from time to time, for such category^ofservice in the society or for the class of societies to which it belongs.

¶91

(2)AII the existing societies with and without state aid shall, if not already approved, prepare service rules, within⁴⁵ days from the day of enforcement of these rules and^submit to the Registrar for approval, which, among others, shall include the following if already not done so, with regard to staffing pattern. Scale of pay and allowances. Method^of filling of posts, qualifications, and rules regarding disciplinary proceedings and other service matters,-

¶92

(3)AII existing societies shall also furnish to the Registrar details of:

¶93

(I) Persons working in the society against the existing posts along with their qualification;

¶94

(ii)Job Chart/Nature of work/Pay Scales for each post/categories.

¶95

(Hi)Staff in excess of staffing pattern if any, prescribed by Registrar;

¶96

(iv)the expenditure towards pay and allowances of the employees and its percentage to working capital and gross income;

¶97

(v) identification of surplus staff or inadequate staff, if any, category wise, and how the society, intends to deal with surplus staff or

¶98

inadequate staff;

¶99

(vi) Pay scales of existing staff and when they are approved and by whom;

¶100

(vii) Working capital and Gross Income;

¶101

(4) Every society within 45 days of registration shall^frame and submit to the Registrar for approval of its staffing pattern which shall include,-

¶102

(a)Service rules for its employee, specifying staffing pattern, qualifications, method of appointment, scales of pay and allowances.

¶103

¶104

responsibilities, duties, training, securities and disciplinary rules etc.

¶105

(b) revision of any of the service rules or pay scales etc. shall be made by the General Body on the recommendation of the Managing Committee provided the expenditure towards pay and allowances of the employees are less than 2% of the working capital or less than 30% of the Gross Profit under intimation to Registrar of Cooperative Societies. Provided further that If it is found to be in excess of the said norms either in audit, Inspection or inquiry, the excess so spent shall be recoverable from members of the Managing Committee concerned under Section 60(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Coop. Societies Act and the Registrar shall have the powers to cancel such pay revision or modify It as deemed fit and adjust securities furnished by the paid servants.

¶106

(c) A society, except the Societies mentioned under Section 115-C & D of the Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964, in respect of State aid shall not frame any rules relating to age of retirement, leave rules, leave travel concession and rules relating to loans to employees which shall be in excess of the subsisting rules of Government concerning these matters.

¶107

(d) The Co-operative Credit Societies covered under Section 115-C & D of the Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 may decide on the age of superannuation of their employees. However, it shall not be in excess of the subsisting rules governing the superannuation of the Government employees. ”

¶108

(5) No society shall appoint as Its paid officer or^servantin any category of service any person who is related to any director or member of the committee of a financing^bankto which the society is affiliated.

¶109

(6) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Bye laws/special bye-laws service regulations of the Co operative societies, except the Societies mentioned^under Section 115-C & D of the Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 every paid servant and officer^ofthe society other than those in the last grade service^shallretire from service on the After Noon of the last date of the month on which he attains the age of 58 years.

¶110

¶111

The last grade servant of the society shall retire^fromthe service on the afternoon of the last date of the month on which he attains the age of 60 years;

¶112

Explanation. -

¶113

(i) For the purposes of the rule, the expression "last grade servant" means Office Subordinate (formerly Attender) /Peon/ Watchman/ Scavenger and other equivalent designations incorporated as such in the staffing pattern as contained in the bye-laws/ special bye-laws of the Cooperative Society and approved by the Registrar.

¶114

(ii) A paid servant of officer of the society including last grade servant, whose date of birth falls on the first of a month shall retire from service on the afternoon of the last day of the proceeding month on attaining the age of (58) or (60) years, as the case may be.

¶115

(7) The Cooperative Credit Societies mentioned in Section 115-C & D of the Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 are exempted from Rule 28 (6) and may frame such bye-laws/speclal bye-laws of service regulations^ofthe Cooperative Credit Societies. Every paid servant and officer of that Society shall retire from service on attaining such age that is not In excess of the subsisting rules governing the age of superannuation of the Government employees.

¶116

For determination of the various issues involved in the

¶117

present case, reference to other provisions of the^ActandRules may not be of much relevance. This apart, the amendment^to Sub-rule (7) of Rule 28 has come into effect on 04.02.2019,^and therefore, various Judgments which have interpretated provisions prior to this amendment relating to the age of superannuation^are not of much relevance for determination of the present issue inasmuch as the Court has to decide the niggling issue of age of

¶118

¶119

superannuation for the servants and officers of the Co-operative Credit Societies only with reference to the amendments brought into effect subsequently.

¶120

The Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Rules 1964 have been promulgated in exercise of the powers^conferred to Sub-section (1) of Section 30 of A.P Cooperative^SocietiesAct 1964 (Act No.7 of 1964). These Rules have been published in A.P Gazette on 30.07.1964. The amendments made to Sub-rule (7) of Rule 28 came into effect on 04.02.2019. Needless^tostate that not only the Rules framed, but also the amendments^madeto the Rule on 04.02.2019 have the force of law inasmuch as the said Rules constitutes ‘subordinate legislation’.

¶121

Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners would contend that as per the Section 30 of the Act No.7 of 1964,^theultimate authority of the Society vests with the General Body. The General Body alone is the competent body that can deal with staffing pattern, pay and other allowances etc., and other contingencies relating to this is vested with the General Body.

¶122

Having considered the Rule position as indicated above, at the admission stage, the learned Single Judge^ofthis Court, at different point of times, have granted interim reliefs in

¶123

¶124

Writ Petitions filed by the ‘servants and officers’ of the Society seeking applicability of ‘completion of 62 years’ as the age of superannuation. The Interim Orders were to the effect^thatthe Writ Petitioners shall be continued until they attain the age of 62 years of superannuation. In other words, the Interim^Orderswould enhance the age of retirement from 60 years to 62 years.

¶125

SUBMISSIONS OF OFFICIAL RESPONDENTS:

¶126

The Principal Secretary, Agriculture and Cooperative Department and the District Cooperative Officer have jointly filed the Counter Affidavit. Principally, the contentions^intheCounter Affidavit as well as the submission of Sri P.Vara Prasad, representing the Official Respondents are that the^ActNo.4 of 2022 (Amendment Act) amending the age of employees working in Government would not apply. The second contention raised by the said respondents is to the effect that unless Bye-laws are amended by the respective Societies, the General Bodies^ofthe Societies are not vested with the power to enhance the age of superannuation from 60 years to 62 years, since the Government, vide Circular Memo dated 23.09.2022 had clarified that the amendment made to Act No.4 of 2022 would only apply^tothe Government Departments and other persons mentioned^therein but the same shall not be applicable to the ‘servants^andofficers

¶127

¶128

working in Cooperative Credit Societies which fall under Sections 115-C & 115-D of Act No.7 of 1964. The third contention is that the Resolutions passed by the General Bodies of the respective Societies would have no force of law until the said Resolutions enhancing the age of superannuation from 60 years to 62 years are approved by the Registrar of Cooperative Societies.

¶129

Sri P. Vara Prasad, learned Assistant Government Pleader, representing Principal Secretary, Agriculture and Cooperative Department and the District Cooperative Officer, had fourthly, contended that the Government of Andhra Pradesh had issued the Model Service Regulations (Regulations) on 23.02.2021. He would submit that as per Para No.11 of ChapterIll of the said Regulations ‘every employee of the society shall retire from service with effect from 1®‘ day of the^month in which he/she attains the age of 60 years’. Learned Counsel^would submit that in view of these Model Service Regulations, particularly with regard to Para No.11 of Chapter-Ill,^theservants and officers of the Societies shall retire only after attaining the age of 60 years but not 62 years.

¶130

¶131

DISCUSSION:

¶132

During the course of submissions, Sri Srinivasa Basava, learned Counsel appearing for some of the Writ Petitioners in some Writ Petitions had submitted that Rule 12 of the A.P Cooperative Societies Rules, 1964 classifies various Societies; that the Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Societies are classified under Clause (b) of Sub-rule (1) of Rule 12 as “Credit Society”; that Sub-Rule (5) deals with sub classification as a) Apex Society b) Central Society and c) Primary Society; that Clause (iii) of Sub-rule (5) of Rule 12 defines “Primary Society” to mean a Society which is^neitheran apex nor a central society. Learned counsel for the Writ Petitioners has also drawn the attention of this Court to G.O.Ms.No.15 dated 04.02.2019 that led to amendments to Rule 28 of the Rules. Vide G.O.Ms.No.36 dated 01.03.2019, the Government has issued Orders to implement Human Resource (HR) Policy to Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit^Societies employees by the Managing Committees as mentioned in Annexure to the said G.O which contains recommendations;^that the Recommendation No.21 deals with retirement age and it categorically states that every paid servant and officer of the Society shall retire from service on attaining such age that is not

¶133

¶134

in excess of the subsisting Rules governing the age of superannuation of the Government employees; that thereafter, the Government has issued the G.O.Ms.No.90 dated 04.02.2020 for the purpose of issuing guidelines. In Para No.3^thereinabout seven guidelines have been mentioned. The said guidelines^are in continuation to the earlier guidelines issued in^G.O.Ms.No.36 dated 01.03.2019.

¶135

Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners has submitted that as per Sub-rule (7) of Rule 28 which came into^forceon 04.02.2019 vide G.O.Ms.No.15 read with Clause (b) of^Sub-rule (4) of Rule 28, it is clear that the Managing Committee, after having ensured that the expenditure towards pay and^allowances of the employees are less than 2% of the working capital^or30% of Gross Profit under intimation to the Registrar of the Cooperative Societies make recommendation to the General Body and that as per Section 30 of the Act No.7 of 1964, the General Body of the Society who has the ultimate authority may either approve the recommendation or reject recommendation. He further submits that once the Resolution has been passed by the General Body approving the recommendation of the Managing Committee, the Registrar of the Cooperative^Societies is only required to be ‘intimated’. Sub-clause (b) of Sub-rule (4) of

¶136

¶137

Rule 28 makes it abundantly clear that there is no requirement of seeking ‘approval’ of the Registrar of Cooperative Societies. Rather a mere intimation would suffice. He would submit that in the present set of cases, the recommendations have^beenmade by the respective Managing Committees to the General body and the General Body, after having considered the recommendations of the Managing Committees, and after ensuring that such recommendations are in tune with financial consideration as indicated therein, have passed Resolutions. Therefore, such Resolutions would completely satisfy all the legal requirements.

¶138

Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners would submit that the amended rule, which has the force of law does not impose obligation on any Society (Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Societies) to seek ‘approval’ either^fromthe Central Bank or from the Government. He would then submit that the Model Service Regulations for PACCS, as referred by Sri P. Vara Prasad, learned Assistant Government Pleader, stipulating the requirement of ‘approval from the Government’ is rather contrary to law.

¶139

Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners would seriously attack the submissions of Sri P. Vara Prasad,^learned Assistant Government Pleader for Cooperation by contending

¶140

¶141

that these Model Bye-laws have been suggested by the Registrar of the Cooperative Societies by Proceedings dated 23.02.2021 and these Proceedings are in the nature of Executive^Instruction and that these Model Bye-laws are contrary to the amended^Sub rule (7) of Rule 28 of A.P Cooperative Societies Act, 1964. They would submit that the Executive Instruction can only supplement, but can never supplant the Statute or the Subordinate Legislation.

¶142

It is pertinent to mention here that even though^the notices were issued to the various Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Societies and have been served on them they have not evinced interest in even entering appearances^and making submissions one way or the other i.e., either in support of the Writ Petitioners or in support of the Department of Agriculture and Cooperative Societies and the District Cooperative^Officer. Even when pertinent question was posed by this Court^astowhat is the stand of the Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Societies and why they have not entered appearance,^learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners have stated that they^haveno interest in participating in the Court Proceedings because General Bodies of the respective Societies have already^resolved in favour of enhancing the age of superannuation by following the due process of law. Learned Counsel for the Respondents^has

¶143

¶144

raised another contention that the present cases are squarely covered by the Judgment of the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Hon’ble Court dated 05.05.2023 in W.A.No.1033 of 2022 and batch.

¶145

Sri P. Vara Prasad, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Cooperation would contend that the Division^Bench had categorically held that the consent of the Government is required and that enhancement of age of superannuation^from60 years to 62 years insofar as Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Societies are concerned is not automatic.

¶146

Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners have contended that the Judgment rendered by the Hon’ble^Division Bench is only with regard Corporations and that the law governing Corporations has been considered by the Hon’ble Division Bench and by taking into consideration various aspects and the law governing Government Corporations and by taking into account the deep and pervasive control on the^{administration} and finances by the Government on the Corporations,^theHon’ble Division Bench, had given a finding that, it is mandatory^toobtain approval from the Government. It is mandatory for Corporations to obtain approval from the Government and that a Resolution

¶147

¶148

made by the Board or the Managing Committee of Corporation would have no effect without an approval from the Government.

¶149

ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS:

¶150

Having considered the submissions of the learned Counsel on either side and having considered the discussion herein above, the following conclusions are arrived by this Court.

¶151

a) That this Court is in agreement with the submissions of the learned Counsel for the Petitioners to the effect that the Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Societies where the Writ Petitioners are working, fall under the categories as defined in Section 115-C & 115-D of the Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 (Act No.7 of 1964)

¶152

b) That on 04.02.2019 Sub-rule (7) came to be inserted under Rule 28, which is categorical to the effect that every paid Servant and Officer of a Society, which falls within the purview of Sections 115-C & 115-D shall retire from service on attaining such age that^is not in excess of the subsisting Rules governing the age of superannuation of the Government employees. The current Statute governing the age of

¶153

¶154

Government employees is under Andhra Pradesh Public Employment (Regulation of Age of Superannuation) (Amendment) Act, 2022 (Act, 4 of 2022) and it prescribes the age of superannuation of Government employees as 62 years. Hence, the age of superannuation for ‘paid servants and officers working in PACCS shall be 62 years as per sub-Rule (7) of Rule 48 of the Rules provided the respective Society had passed a Resolution by complying with Sub-rule (4) of Rule 28 of the Co-operative Societies Rules, 1969.

¶155

c) That Clause (b) of Sub-rule (4) of Rule 28 would provide that, if a society intends to revise any of^the service rules or pay scales etc., it shall be made only by a Resolution of the General Body and that the Resolution of the General Body which is preceded by the recommendation of the Managing Committee and that such recommendation of the Managing Committee should be preceded with ensuring that the expenditure towards Pay and Allowances of the employees are less than 2% of the working capital or less than 30% of the Gross Profit. It is also

¶156

¶157

Stipulated in the Clause (b) of Sub-rule (4) of Rule²⁸ that, such Resolution approving the recommendation made by the Managing Committee shall be ‘intimated’ to the Registrar of Co-operative Societies.

¶158

d) Clause (b) of Sub-rule (4) of Rule 28 would also stipulate that, if the Managing Committee has recommended without ensuring the financial viability. as indicated above, the Resolution per se would not become illegal and if excess amount has been paid the excess so spent shall be recoverable from members of the Managing Committee concerned under Section 60(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act and the Registrar shall have the power to cancel such pay revision to modify it as deemed fit and adjust securities furnished by^the paid servants.

¶159

e) Parity cannot be drawn between the Government Corporations and the Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Societies either in terms of financial autonomy or the administrative autonomy. Also, parity cannot be drawn between Government Corporations and Primary Agricultural Cooperative

¶160

¶161

Credit Societies because the Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Societies are governed under Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 and A.P Cooperative Society Rules, 1964. Special provisions are enacted for Credit Societies which are brought under the purview of Sections 115-C & 115-D of the Act, 1964 and there is no comparable provision or provisions governing the Government Corporations. Therefore, for the reasons stated, no parity can be drawn between the Government Corporations and the Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Societies. Therefore, the Judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Hon’ble Court in W.A.No.1033 of 2022 and batch dated 05.05.2023, is not applicable to the set of facts in the present Writ Petitions.

¶162

(f) The Model bye-law, which was cited by Sri P. Vara Prasad, Learned Counsel for the Official Respondents is held to be contrary to the parent Statute and Subordinate Legislation namely the Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 (Act 7 of 1964) and the A.P Cooperative Societies Rules, 1964. It is

¶163

¶164

further held that the Model bye-law which was issued by the Registrar of Cooperative Societies dated 23.02.2021 is only an Executive Instruction and it does not have the force of law. {B.N. Nagarajan and others etc., Vs. State of Mysore and Others, etc.. [(1966) 3 SCR 682], Para Nos. 3 to 24; State of Maharashtra /s. Jagannath Achyut Karandikar [1989 Supp (1) 393], Para Nos. 6 to 12; Union of India and Another Vs. Ashok Kumar Aggarwa! [(2013) 16 SCO 147], Para Nos. 59 to 62 and Jaiveer Singh and Others /s. State of Uttarakhand and Others [2023 SCO Online SC 1584], Para Nos.46 to 49).

¶165

In view of the above conclusions drawn by this Court, herein above, the Writ Petitions are allowed. The servants and officers of all Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit^Societies shall be retired on the last day of the month completing 62 years of age. There shall be a further direction that such of those Writ Petitioners who were made to retire on completion of 60 years of age during the pendency of their respective Writ Petitions^shall now be reinstated into service, if they have not completed⁶² years of age and they shall also be paid arrears of salary by the respective Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit^Societies. It is

¶166

¶167

made clear that this direction is only applicable to such persons who have filed Writ Petitions before they have attained the age of 60 years but interim protection could not be granted for any reason. No Order as to Costs.

¶168