Writ petition sought mandamus to initiate disciplinary proceedings against respondent No.2. Both the petitioner and respondent No.2 were reported dead, with death certificates produced. The writ petition was dismissed as abated, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010188462009
[3333]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY , T HE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO T H OUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 14648/2009
Between:
Sri Gandham Venkat Raju ...PETITIONER
AND
The Registrar and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.M V V BASWA RAJ
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
2.GP FOR COOPERATION
The Court made the following:
2
(VS,J W.P.No.14648 of 2009)
ORDER :
The present Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-
“…to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondent No.1 to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the respondent No.2 and take necessary steps in this regard and to pass such order other orders .…….”
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
25th April,2024. RPD.
3
(VS,J
W.P.No.14648 of 2009)
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 14648 of 2009
Date: 25.04.2024.
RPD.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a mandamus could issue directing initiation of disciplinary proceedings against respondent No.2.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri Gandham Venkat Raju
The Registrar
Others
V. Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
