Y.Ram Mohan, Vijayawada v. the Director General Sprots Authority of India, and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI…
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 12170 OF 2006
Between:
Y.Ram Mohan, S/o.Krishna Murhty, Aged 52 years, working as Gymnastics Coach, Staff No.731, Sports Authority of India V.P.Siddharatha Public School, Vijaywada-10, AP
...PETITIONER
AND
(Dismissed for default as against RR3 & 4 as per court order dated 22.06.2011)
...RESPONDENTS
‘' Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndiaisfiledpraying 4hat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filedtherewith,theHigh •Court may be'pleased to issue a writ order or directionmoreparticularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, calling fortherecordsrelatingto and connected with the Judgment dated 24.6.2005 inOA.No.225/2003of the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad,andsetasidethe same including the proceedings No.526(2)/CS/SAI/362, dated3/5-8-2002 and consequently direct the respondents to fix the seniority of the petitioner in the cadre of coaches Grade-ll from thedateofjoining in SAI i.e. 8.11.1986 and award all consequential benefits
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP. NO: 15140 OF 2006)
Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supportofthepetition,the High Court may be pleased to fix an early date forthehearingoftheabove writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M KESAVA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: SC FOR CENTRALGOVERMENT
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010057412006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3470]
TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 12170/2006
Between;
Y.ram Mohan, Vijayawada
...PETITIONER
AND
The Director General Sprots Authority Of India 3 Others and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.M KESAVARAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.0 RAMESH
3.B VAIJAYANTH!
The Court made the following:
ORDER: (per Ravi Nath Tilhari, J)
Sri M.Keshava Rao, learned counsel for the petitionersubmitsthathe
has instructions from the petitioner that the petitioner does not want to press
this petition and the same may be dismissed as not pressed.
- Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also
stand closed.
Sd/- KL PAVANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR/
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 One CC to Sri M. Kesava Rao, Advocate [OPUC]
ERK
PRK
J'
ERK
HIGH COURT
DATED:09/07/2024
ORDER
WP.No.12170 of 2006
73:\o 2 7 DEC 2n?^
Co
Current Section ,
DISMISSING THE WP AS NOT PRESSED
WITHOUT COSTS
Y. Ram Mohan
The Director General, Sports Authority of India
Union of India
Ravi Nath Tilhari
Nyapathy Vijay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court