A writ appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant, unrepresented, appeared neither in person nor by counsel and was deemed not to be interested in pursuing the matter.
The Writ Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010016142016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH Bench Sr.No:-1 [3483] AT AMARAVATI
WRIT APPEAL NO: 820 of 2016
B S Mallikarjunudu
...Appellant
Vs.
Smt. V Radhika Venugopal and others ...Respondents
Advocate for Appellant : NONE Advocate(s) for Respondent(s) : NONE
CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
DATE : 21st October 2024
P C :
None for the appellant.
Even on the previous date of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant.
It appears that the appellant is no longer interested in pursuing the matter.
The Writ Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J
Vjl
B S Mallikarjunudu
Smt. V Radhika Venugopal and others
DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
