The Tax Revision Case filed by M/s. D. Viswanatha Reddy & Co. against the State of Andhra Pradesh was dismissed for want of prosecution without any order as to costs.
The Tax Revision Case is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
!.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATl FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
AND
HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA TAX REVISION CASE NO: 198 OF 2009
Tax Revision Case filed under Section 22(1) read withRule40of APGST Rules Under Section APGST Act, 1957 to reviseorderdated 31/12/2008 passed in T.A.No.740 of 2006 on the fileoftheSalesTax Appellate Tribunal, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad preferredagainsttheorderof the Appellate Deputy Commissioner(CT), Kurnool dated01-03-2006passedin S.No.398/2005-06 against the order dated 30-07-2005passedinRc.No. KNL/06/02/2005-2006 by the Commercial Tax Officer-III(FAC),Kurnool, Kurnool District.
Between:
M/s. D. Viswanatha Reddy & Co, Kurnool, rep. by itsPartnerD.Hussain ... Appellant
AND
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its State Representative,Before Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Nampally, Hyderabad.
Counsel for the PetitioneriSRI. VENKATRAM REDDY MANTUR (not
appeared)
Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX
The Court made the following:
APHC010538062009
/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3481]
(
FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
/ /
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
TAX REVISION CASE NO: 198/2009
Between:
M/s. D. Viswanatha Reddy & Co. ...PETITIONER
AND
State Of A P
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.VENKATRAM REDDY MANTUR
Counsel for the Respondent:
1.GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX
The Court made the following:
There is no representation for the petitioner.
- The matter is in the weekly cause list.
- The Tax Revision Case is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs.
r
I
As a
sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also
stand closed.
SDI- P. VENKATA RAMANA JOINT REGISTRAR
\
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
nm
HIGH COURT DATED;26/04/2024
ORDER
TREVC.No.198 of 2009
5 16 <;fp 20i'( .z
DISMISSING THE TAX REVISION CASE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
M/s. D. Viswanatha Reddy & Co.
State of Andhra Pradesh
Ravi Nath Tilhari
Kiranmayee Mandava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
