Dismissed

Muthyala Lavanya v. Muthyala Sreenivas

Andhra Pradesh HC7 Jan 2024TRCMP/1/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Wife sought transfer of a guardianship petition (G.O.P.) from the Family Court at Rajamahendravaram to Krishna District. Counsel withdrew the transfer petition seeking liberty to refile with a corrected prayer; the High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn with permission to file a fresh petition with corrected prayer; interim stay, if any, vacated; no costs.

Muthyala Lavanya Vs Muthyala Sreenivas — Matrimonial and Divorce | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶2

MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BANDARU SYAMSUNDER

¶5

TRANS. CIVIL MISC.PETITION NO: 1 OF 2024

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

Muthyala Lavanya, W/o. M. Sreenivas, Hindu, D/o. Jonnalagadda Rama Rao, Occ Software Employee, Aged about 31 years, R/o. D.No.8-46, Kolluri Vari Bajzar, Gantasala Village and Mandal, Krishna District.

¶8

...PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

Muthyala Sreenivas, S/o. Satyanarayana, Hindu, Aged about 33 years, Occ Software Employee, R/o.D.No.25-9-13/1, Near Andhra Bank, Jaya Krishnapuram, Rajahmahendravaram Town East Godavari District.

¶11

...RESPONDENT

¶12

Petition under Section 24 of the C.P.C. Praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to withdraw G.O.P.No.44 of 2022 on the file of the Family Court-cum-IX^Additional District Court, East Godavari District at Rajamahendravaram^{andtotransfertoSeniorCivil} Judge's Court, Avanigadda of Krishna District.

¶13

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶14

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in G.O.P.No.44 of 2022 on the file of Family Court- cumIX Additional District Court, East Godavari District at Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District.

¶15

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. K SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

¶16

Counsel for the Respondents:

¶17

The Court made the following OREDR: -

¶18

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE BANDARU SYAMSUNDER

¶19

IRANSFER CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION ISIn.ni nf 7n->/i

¶20

ORDER:

¶21

The learned counsel Mr.K.Raghuveer, representing on behalf of Mr.K.satyanarayana Murthy, learned counsel for petitioner, sought permission to withdraw the petition with a

¶22

liberty to file fresh petition with correct prayer.

¶23

Permission is accorded.

¶24

In the result, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition i:IS

¶25

dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.

¶26

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand

¶27

closed. The interim stay granted if any, shall stand vacated.

¶28

Sd/- U SRI DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

To,

Rafamren^d™'"''"

SECffioN

OFFICER

District at Godavari

Hindu, Occ: Software Employee, R/o.D.No.25-9-13/1. Near Andhra Bank Jaya Krishnapuram, Rajahmahendravaram Town East Godavari District ?hreeC.D copies®"'""""'"''""" 'O^GCJ

¶36

t: ?hreeC.D copies®"'""""'"''"""

SSL VNA

HIGH COURT

DATED:08/01/2024

ORDER

TRCMP.N0.1 OF 2024

DISMISSING THE TR.CMP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

Muthyala Lavanya v. Muthyala Sreenivas

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Muthyala Lavanya v. Muthyala Sreenivas

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt.Bathula Lakshmi Tulasi Vs Sri Bathulasankar Rao

Smt. Penamatsa Venkata Subbayamma Vs Smt.Penmatsa Parvathi

Shaik Rusheena Begum Vs Mohammaed Huzur Anwar Parvez

Asapu Vinodh, Vs Asapu Anusha

Chilaka Koteswaramma Vs Chilaka Vara Prasada Rao

Smt Surisettimanika Vs Dr Surisetti Vidya Sagar