Dismissed

United India Insurance Company v. Kovvali Kusuma Kumari and 2 Ors.

Andhra Pradesh HC18 Feb 2024MACMA/2045/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this motor accident civil miscellaneous appeal, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the matter for default due to the appellant's non-prosecution after notice of the cause list captioning it 'for dismissal' was issued but no appearance was made.

What did the court decide?

Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2045 of 2016 is dismissed for default due to non-prosecution by the appellant.

United India Insurance Company Vs Kovvali… — Motor Accident Claims | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶2

MONDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶3

PRESENT
Pi
mpl
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A V RAVINDRA BABU V
>.■' A 4

¶4

MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 2045 OF 2016

¶5

Appeal under Section 173 of M.V.Act against the Judgment^andDecree dated 18/12/2008 in MVOP No.530/2006 on the file of the Court of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal cum PrI.District Judge, East^{GodavariDistrict.}

¶6

Between:

¶7

United India Insurance Company, rep by its Divisional Manger 0/o.Vengalarao Nagar, Hyderabad. ...Appellant/Respondent No.2

¶8

AND

¶9

Kovvali Kusuma Kumari, W/o.Laxmi Narasimha Rao, Hindu, Aged 48 years Housewife, R/o.Rajahmundry.

¶10

Kovvali Laxmi Narasimha Rao, S/o.Kasi Visweswara Rao, Hindu, aged 59 years. Employee R/o.Guntur.

¶11

Jetty Sreenivas, S/o.Somayya, Hindu, Aged about 40 years. Engineer R/o.Kukatpally, Hyderabad,

¶12

...Respondents/Respt No.1

¶13

I.A. NO: 2 OF 2009fMACMAMP. NO: 6257 OF 20091

¶14

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the Judgment and Decree dated 18-12-2008 in OP.NO. 530 of 2006 on the file of the in the Court of MACT before the Principal District Judge at Rajahmundry, pending disposal of the aforesaid MACMA interest of justice.

¶15

Counsel for the Appellant: SRI. P PAHLGUNA RAO

¶16

Counsel for the Respondents: SRI N SIVA REDDY

¶17

The Court made the following: JUDGMENT

¶18

¶19

¶20

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI

¶21

MONDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY

¶22

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶23

PRESENT

¶24

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A V RAVINDRA BABU

¶25

MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO:

¶26

2045 OF 2016

¶27

Between:

¶28

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY, rep by its Divisional Manger 0/o.Vengalarao Nagar, Hyderabad.

...APPELLANT(S)

AND

KOWALI KUSUMA KUMARI 2 ORS, W/o.Laxmi Narasimha Rao, Hindu Housewife R/o.Rajahmundry.

¶33

Kovvali Laxmi Narasimha Rao, S/o.Kasi Visweswara Rao, Hindu Employee R/o.Guntur.

¶34

Jetty Sreenivas, S/o.Somayya, Hindu Engineer R/o.Kukatpally, Hyderabad,

¶35

...RESPONDENTS

¶36

The Court made the following:

¶37

JUDGMENT:

¶38

None represented for the appellant.

¶39

Learned counsel for the respondents is present.

¶40

As the learned counsel for the appellant is no more,^this

¶41

Court sent notice to the appellant and though there^wasservice

¶42

of notice on the appellant, still nobody made any appearance.

¶43

Name of the appellant is also printed in the cause list. Case is

¶44

coming under the caption ‘for dismissal’.

¶45

Under the circumstances, the M.A.C.M.A., is dismissed for

¶46

default for its non-prosecution.

¶47

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any,

¶48

shall stand closed.

¶49

¶50

SD/- SHAIK MOHD. RAFI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTfON OFFICER

To.

The Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-Principal District Judge, East Godavari District, (with records)

¶55

One CC to Sri. P Phalguna Rao, Advocate [OPUC]

¶56

One CC to Sri. N Siva Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]

¶57

The Section Officer, V.R Section, High Court of^{AndhraPradeshatAmaravati.}

¶58

Three CD Copies

¶59

VNA

¶60

4 X

HIGH COURT

DATED:19/02/2024

JUDGMENT

MACMA.No.2045 of 2016

¶65

fX 2 7 MAR 2024 ■ol
C'.-;
^ Curreni Section
- Sk

¶66

Icopi^ JAEe

¶67

DISMISSING THE MACMA FOR NON-PROSECUTION

¶68

■*: ♦

United India Insurance Company v. Kovvali Kusuma Kumari and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

United India Insurance Company v. Kovvali Kusuma Kumari and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.P.S.R.T.C., and Another Vs Mallik Rekhi and 3 Others

Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Vs Rally Sai Likith Bharadwaj

Katta Kanaka Durga at Katta Durgamma Vs Nuthalapati Triveni

The Apsrtc, Vs Gunnam Venkata Lakshmi Died as per Lr

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs B.Y. Ramaiah and 2 Others

Smt. Shaik Jebunnisa Begum and 3 Others Vs K.Ravi Kumar and 2 Others