Dismissed
Katragadda Koteswara Rao v. Katragadda Lakshmi Anusha
Andhra Pradesh HCFCA/74/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI FRIDAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI FRIDAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI
FRIDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
FAMILY COURT APPEAL fFCA^ NO- 74 OF 2023
Appeal under section 19 of Family Courts Act aggrieved by the Order and Decree dt.28-12-2022 passed in F.C.O.P.No.1167 of 2019 on the file of the XIV Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Judge Additional Family Court, Vijayawada, NTR District
Between:
Katragadda Koteswara Rao, S/o Rama Rao, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Private Employee, Resident of D.No.41-1/4-46, First Line Dwaraka Nagar, Krishnalanka, Vijayawada, NTR District
...Appellant/Respondent
AND
Katragadda Lakshmi Anusha, W/o Koteswara Rao, Agedabout 31 years, Occ. Housewife, Presently residing at D.No.49-4-12/5A, Carmelnagar, Konka Road, Nunna, Gundala Bridge, Vijayawada, NTR District.
...Respondents/Petitioner
lA NO: 2 OF 207.^
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be
Counsel for the Appellant: Sri. Pamarthi Kameswara Rao (NP)
Counsel for the Respondent: Sri. K V L Narasimha Rao
The Court made the following:
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. NARENDAR AND
HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.74 of 2023
JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice G. Narendar)
When this appeal was previously listed on 26.07.2024,there
was no
representation and this Bench recorded as under;
“When the case is called, there is no representation. Even on the previous date of hearing i.e., on 19.07.2024, there was no representation.
List these appeals under the caption ‘for dismissal’ on 02.08.2024.”
is called, there is no 2. Even today, when the case representation on behalf of the appellant, despitethematterbeing listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’.
As a 3. Hence, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. sequel, pending interlocutory applications, if any,shallstandclosed.
There shall be no order as to costs.
//TRUE COPY//
SDI- P VENKATA RAMANA JOINT REGISTRAR
-/''^CTION'OFFICER
Stu sree
A..
HIGH COURT
DATED:02/08/2024
JUDGMENT
FCA.No.74 of 2023
DISMISSING THE F.C.A. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
Katragadda Koteswara Rao
Katragadda Lakshmi Anusha
G. Narendar
Kiranmayee Mandava
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court