Civil revision petition challenging an interlocutory order of the III Additional District Judge, Tirupati. Counsel for the petitioner represented that the underlying suit was disposed of as not pressed and no cause of action survived. The High Court dismissed the revision petition as infructuous, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 857 OF 2018
Petition under Section 115 of C.P.C, aggrieved by theordersdated03-07- 2017 made in lA.No. 992 of 2015 in CFR No. 4929/2015 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Tirupati, Chittoor District
Between:
Salla Nagabhushanam, S/o.Late Chenna Kesavulu, Aged about 52 years, OcciBusiness, R/o Old D.No. 6-14, New D.No. 6-24, Kotha Street, Varasaiahpalem Village and Mandal, ChittoorDistrict
...REVISION PETITIONER / PETITIONER / APPELLANT
AND
Kumari Pushpalatha, D/o.Late Pundarikakshayya, Aged about 15 years Rep. By Next Friend and Guardian Grand Mother S.Saraswathi, Presently Staying with Pitchikavari Street, Kovvuru Village and Mandal, SPSR.Nellore District
...RESPONDENT / RESPONDENT
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 91 days in filing theRevision
4
" Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. O UDAYA KUMAR
j:.^>Counsel for the Respondent: —
The Court made the following:
•V
APHC010057382018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3460]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 857/2018
Between:
Salla Nagabhushanam
...PETITIONER
AND
Kumari Pushpalatha
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.0 UDAYA KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent:
The Court made the following:
/
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
C.R.P.No.857 of 2018
ORDER:
This revision is filed questioning the order dated 03.07.2017 in I.A.No.992 of 2015 in O.S.No.4929 of 2015 passed by the III Additional District Judge, Tirupati. 2. It is represented by Sri. O.Udaya Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner through virtual mode that the suit was disposed of as not pressed on 15.12.2020 and no cause of action survives for consideration in this revision petition. 3. Noting the said submission, the revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand dismissed.
SDI- K. KASI RAO ACHARI ASSISTANT^GISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
MV AL
MV
HIGH COURT
DATED: 02/09/2024
ORDER
CRP.No.857 of 2018
of andh^
I 10 DEC 202‘« J
DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Salla Nagabhushanam
Kumari Pushpalatha
Nyapathy Vijay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
