Civil Revision Petition under the A.P. Buildings (Lease Rent and Eviction) Control Act arising from a rent court appeal. Counsel reported out-of-court settlement; the High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous, recording the settlement submission, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
FRIDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 477 OF 201 fi
Petition under Section 22 of the A.P. Buildings (Lease Rent & Eviction) Control Act aggrieved by the order dated 10-12-2015 in RCCMA No. 14 of 2014 on the file of the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Jduge, Cum Appellate Authority under AP Buildings (Lease Rent and Eviction) Control Act, Vijayawada.
Between:
Sri Kolipakula Steels Corporation, Rep. by its Proprietor K.B.V.Jagadish S/o. Late Ramanaiah, Vijayawada.
...Petitioner/Respondent/Tenant
AND
Chennuri Babu Rao, S/o. Kanakaiah, aged about 674 years, R/o. D.No. 11-22-2, 1st Floor, R.R.Appa Rao Street, Vijayawada-1.
...Respondent/Appellant/Landlord
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(CRPMP. NO: 594 OF 201 fi)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order and decree dated 10-12-2015 passed in
RCCMA No. 14 of 2014 by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge-CumAppellate Authority under AP Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Adt Vjjl^yawada.
»* S X
y-
the Petitioner: M/s. VANGALA SAILAJA
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
C.R.P.NO. 477 OF 2016
ORDER:
There is no representation on behalf of the Petitioner.
It is represented by Sri Chiranjeevi K.V.M, learned counsel, representing Sri Gandhadar Chamarthy, learned counsel for the respondent, that the dispute between the parties is settled outoftheCourtandassuch,no cause of action survives in this Petition.
Considering the peculiar situation in this case and recording the specific submission of the learned counsel for the respondent regarding the settlement of the dispute between the parties, the present Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pendingshallstand closed.
SD/- SHAIK MOHD. RAFI assistant REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// G
SB N OFFICER
To.
records if any) (with
High Court of A.P. at Amaravati.
vna
HIGH COURT
DATED:12/01/2024
■i
ORDER
CRP.No.477 of 2016
'
t-fV'
y<h (/>
X,!
Tsa''
o
u
J-'
DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sri Kolipakula Steels Corporation, Rep. by its Proprietor K.B.V. Jagadish
Chennuri Babu Rao
Nyapathy Vijay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
