2023 was filed under section 12 of CPC, taking plea that the plaintiff was precluded from instituting the present O.S.No.32 of 2019. 4. During pendency of the suit, Ch.Nirmala - defendant No.6 in the suit died. The legal representatives were already on record as defendant Nos.7 to 9 (respondent Nos.6 to 8 herein). On 21.04.2023, the plaintiff filed a memo to that effect, to which the petitioners had no objection. On the said memo no order was passed till filing of the applications on 08.08.2023. The memo was entertained after recognizing the legal representatives on record on 17.08.2023. The matter was posted for cariying out amendment &, amended plaint copy on 31.08.2023. After the amendment in the plaint, the petitioners did not amend/correct their applications i.e., I.A.Nos.953, 954, 955 85 956 of 2023 in the array of the parties. 5. All the application Nos.953, 954, 955, 956 of 2023 have been decided by the common order dated 08.09.2023 impugned in this petition. 6. The learned Trial Court considered the question whether or not the applications filed by the present petitioners deserved entertaining and allowing? On this point, the learned Trial Court in substance making the observations in para Nos.50 to 53 held that all the said applications were required to be negated at the threshold.
