Civil revision petition arising from an execution proceeding; on hearing, counsel submitted the cause no longer survived due to passage of time. The court recorded the submission and dismissed the revision as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1871 OF 2013
Petition under Section 115 of C.P.C, aggrieved by theOrderdated 26.04.2012 passed in EP No.92 of 2010 in O.S No.91of1999onthefileof the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri.
Between:
...PETITIONERS/JUDGMENT DEBTOR NOS.2 AND 3
AND
(3rd Decree holder who is transferee of Decree was added as per Orders in E.A.No.396of 2011 dated 21-11-2011)
...RESPONDENTS/DECREE HOLDERS/PLAINTIFFS
r
(Respondent Nos.4 to 6 are not necessary parties to this petition)
...RESPONDENTS/JUDGMENT DEBTOR NOS.1,4 AND 5/
DEFENDANT NOS.1,4 AND 5
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2013 (CRPMP.NO: 2509 OF 20131
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including theexecution of arrest warrant by suspending the operation of the Order passed in EP.No.92 of 2010 in OS.No.91 of 1999 on the file of the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri dated 26/04/2012 pending disposaloftheCRP.
Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI D PRAVEEN KUMAR
REPRESENTING FOR SRI CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : SRI R PRASAD
The Court made the following ORDER :
b
APHC010619362013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3331]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1871/2013
Between:
Achyuta Ramachandrarao, and Others ...PETITIONER(S)
AND
Kantam Venkateswara Reddy Died and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.GHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.R PRASAD
The Court made the following:
ORDER
When the civil revision petition came up for hearing, Sri D.Praveen Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri Challa Srinivasa Reddy, learned counsel for petitioner would submit that by afflux of time, cause in this revision does not survive for adjudication and the same has now rendered infructuous.
it
A'
Page 2 of 2
f
Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is
Dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall
stand closed.
SD/- K.KASIRAO ACHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECtlOirOFFICER
To,
TAC
V
r' )
HIGH COURT
DATED:11/09/2024
ORDER
CRP.No.1871 of 2013
o
\0 2 0 NCV m It
^ Current Secti
p at c VA'
DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Achyuta Ramachandrarao
Achyuta Sravana Kumar
Kantam Venkateswara Reddy
Kantam Padmavathi
Annavarapu Prabhakara Rao
Subba Reddy Satti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
