Criminal petition seeking to quash proceedings under Section 482 CrPC was withdrawn by petitioner counsel after noting trial commencement; petition dismissed with liberty to face trial.
Permission to withdraw the criminal petition granted with liberty to face the trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3333]
APHC010148652019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3401/2019
Between:
M.gurunatha Rao and Others
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)
AND
State Of Ap and Others
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1.A S C BOSE
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
The Court made the following:
2
ORDER :
The present Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.199 of 2018 on the file of the VI Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Visakhapatnam.
liberty to the petitioners to face the trial.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this petition shall stand closed.
__________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
Date:17.12.2024 SCS
3
208
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3401/2019
Date:17.12.2024.
SCS.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether permission should be granted to withdraw the criminal petition with liberty to face the trial when trial has already commenced.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.gurunatha Rao and Others
State Of Ap and Others
V.SUJATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
