The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking quashment of criminal proceedings. The Court held that the relief sought had become infructuous and thus disposed of the matter accordingly.
No further proceedings as the relief sought by the petitioners had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 173 OF 2023
Between:
Dasarigunta Vinayaka Nagar, Vedanthapuram, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District.
-2-
...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Nos. 5 to 13
AND
...RESPONDENT/DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that inthecircumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused No. 5 to 13 in C.C.No.448/2021 on the file of V Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tirupati which arose out at Cr. No.637/2020 of Tiruchanur Police Station, Tirupati District.
-3-
I.A. NO: 2 OF 2023
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings against the petitioners/accused No.5 to 13 in C.C.No. 448/2021 on the file of V Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tirupati which arose out of Cr.No. 637/2020 of Tiruchanur Police Station, TirupatiDistrict. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri D PURNACHANDRA REDDY ,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent
The Court made the following:
APHC010008762023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WF AT AMARAVATI [3396] (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 173/2023
Between: C.Minna Rao, and Others
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)
AND
M Mariyappan and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
/
1.D PURNACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.
The Court made the following: ORDER:
The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.P.C.”) has been filed by the Petitioners/Accused Nos.5 to 13, seeking quashment of the proceedings against them in C.C.No.448 of 2021 on the file of V Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tirupathi, for the offence punishable under Section 324 r/w.34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short ‘I.P.C.’).
2
VJP.J CrI P.No.173 of 2023
- Heard Sri D.Purna Chandra Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioners and Ms. D.Prasanna Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public
Prosecutor representing the State/Respondent No.2.
may be disposed of, since relief has become infructuous.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall
stand closed.
Sd/- K.KASIRAO ACHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// S * t
SECTION OFFICER
To,
Two CD Copies
RDB
VSNL (ACCTS)
(RDB)
HIGH COURT
DATED:06/05/2024
ORDER
5 0 3 SEP 202^
CRLP.No.173 of 2023
CRIMINAL PETITION IS
DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashment of proceedings should be allowed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
C.Minna Rao and Others
M. Mariyappan
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
