Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings dismissed as infructuous because the matter was settled and disposed of by the trial Court.
Relief dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
^4
■PS.
>1
[N THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATlfg (H
Of'
Oo
MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1224 OF 2021
Between:
...Petitioner/Accused
AND
...Respondent
...Respondent/Complainant
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C. No.
4’
V
tli
w ^1,4
on the file of the Court of the XVI Additional Metropolitan ^^Mtgi^rate, Bheemunipatnam, Visakhapatnam City.
r
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition 1 the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedingsinCC. No. 167/2019 on the file of the Court of the XVI Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate 1 Bheemunipatnam, Visakhapatnam City pending disposal of Criminal Petition before this Honourable Court.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusingtheMemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri C Prakash Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2
The Court made the following:
\
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1224 OF 2021
Between:
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):
Counsel for the petitioner/ s Counsel for respondent No. 1 Counsel for respondent No.2
Sri C.Prakash Reddy
Assistant Public Prosecutor
ORDER:
The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is filed by the Petitioner/Accused, seeking to quash the proceedings against him in C.C.No.l67 of 2019 on the file of the Court of XVI Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Bheemunipatnam, Visakhapatnam City.
- As per the information furnished from the Registry, the matter was settled between the parties before Lok Adalatin the trial Court.
2
- Sri C.Prakash Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioneralso would submit that parties compromised in this mattei'andcase has been disposed of by the trial Court and petition may be" disposed of by recording the same.
- Ms.D.Prasanna Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the State/respondent No.l is in attendance.
- In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as relief has become infructuous.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- K KASIRAO ACHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
CTION OFFICER
To,
/
HIGH COURT
DATED: 04/03/2024
ORDER
CRLP.No.1224 of 2021
O
o
rnjS
g 0 6 JUL 202't Op
•^A
Sespatgi^
DISMISSING THE CRLP AS INFRUCTUOUS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mandarapu Durga Prasad
State of Andhra Pradesh
Narijis Bhanu
VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
