Allowed

The Official Liquidator v. a

Andhra Pradesh HC17 Jun 2024COMPA/14/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed the Official Liquidator's application to place on record the half-yearly accounts and audit report for the period April to September 2022, and permitted payment of the audit fee. The claim for miscellaneous expenses was rejected due to lack of detail or evidence.

What did the court decide?

Accounts and audit report placed on record; permission granted to pay audit fee of Rs. 500 plus GST.

The Official Liquidator Vs a — Insolvency and Bankruptcy | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

APHC010239952024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

[3311]

¶4

TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI

¶7

COMPANY APPLICATION NO: 14/2024

¶8

Between:

¶9

The Official Liquidator

¶10

...Applicant

¶11

Counsel for the Applicant:

¶12

Sri T V P SAI VIHARI(SC FOR OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR)

¶13

The Court made the following:

¶14

¶15

BSB, J

¶16

Comp. A No.14 of 2024

¶17

THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE B.S.BHANUMATHI

¶18

Company Application No.14 of 2024 In

¶19

R.C.C.No.11 of 1998

¶20

ORDER :

¶21

This company application is filed under Section 462 of the Companies Act, 1956 read with Rule 298 and Rule 306 of the Companies (Court) Rules 1959 by the Official Liquidator, for the following reliefs:

¶22

i) Take the half-yearly accounts of the subject company (in liquidation) for the period from 01-04-2022 to 30-09-2022 along with Auditor Report dated 27-12-2023 submitted on 03-01-2024 by M/s. Murthy & Kanth, Chartered Accountants on record and permission may be accorded to make the payment of audit fee of Rs.500 plus GST.

¶23

ii) Cost of this application and any miscellaneous expenses may be permitted to be met out by the Official Liquidator from the available funds of the company (in liquidation) or Estate and Establishment Fund Account if no fund is available in the company’s account; and

¶24

iii) Pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

¶25

Heard Sri Sk. Rafi , learned counsel representing Sri T.V.P. Sai Vihari , learned standing counsel for the Official Liquidator.

¶26

¶27

BSB, J Comp. A No.14 of 2024

¶28

The applicant, in the affidavit filed in support of the application, stated that the half-yearly accounts for the period from 01-04-2022 to 30-09-2022 had been duly audited by the auditor, M/s. Murthy & Kanth, Chartered Accountants appointed pursuant to the order of this Court, dated 27.07.2023, in C.A.No.7 of 2023. It is further stated that the auditor had submitted the audit report, dated 27.12.2023, in respect of the above company (in liquidation) on 03.01.2024. A perusal of the audit report, it is observed therein - “there is no adverse comments and observation on the Statement of Accounts” of the company (in liquidation). Insofar as the miscellaneous expenses are concerned, since there is no detail or the evidence, it cannot be allowed.

¶29

In view of the aforesaid submissions, the company application is allowed as prayed for, except the miscellaneous expenses. No costs.

¶30

___________________ B.S.BHANUMATHI, J

¶31

18.06.2024 RAR

The Official Liquidator v. a

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Official Liquidator v. a

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chitte Reddy Prasanna at Jada Prasanna, Vs Sunkesula Chinna Basha

Vaddadi Laxmana Rao Vs Reddy Suramma

Aramadaka Lalitha Vs Kovvuri Satyanarayana Reddy

The Official Liquidator Vs a

The Official Liquidator Vs a

The Official Liquidator Vs a