The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear or be represented on multiple listing dates.
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 281/2013 dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVA^I THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 281 OF 201.^
Appeal filed Under Order 43 Rule 1 of C.P.C against the order passed in IA.No.663 of 2012 in OS.No.644 of 2012, dated 13-12-2012 on the file of 5*^ Additional Senior Civil Judge, Guntur.
Between:
Duggempudi Rami Reddy, S/o. Appi Reddy, Cultivation R/o. D.No. 11-100 Challavaripalem Village Nallapadu Post, Guntur District
...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT
AND
...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT
LA. NO: 1 OF 2013fCMAMP. NO: 648 OF 20131
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders of the lower court in I.A. No. 663 of 2012 in
OS No. 644 of 2012 on ttiG fil© of 5th Addl. Sonior Civil JudgG, Guntur pending disposal of the above Civil Misc Appeal.
Counsel for the Appellant.SRI. P. VIJAYA KIRAN
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: DODDALA KOTESWRA RAO
The Court made the following: ORDER
\
APHC010113402013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3460]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
/
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 281/2013
Between:
Duggempudi Rami Reddy, Guntur Dist ...APPELLANT
AND
Challa Lakshma Reddy Guntur Dist Ano and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Appellant:
1.PVIJAYAKIRAN
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.6721/KUSURI SATYANARAYANA
2.DODDALA KOTESWRA RAO
The Court made the following:
The present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the interlocutory order dated 31.01.2011 in I.A.No.663 of 2012 in O.S.No.644 of 2013 passed
by V Additional Senior Civil Judge, Guntur.
- As there was no representation for the petitioner on 15.03.2024, 24.04.2024 and 25.04.2024, the case was adjourned to today and listed under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today there was no representation for the petitioner.
SD/- M. RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// 4^ SECTION OFFICER
\
To,
nm
V
HIGH COURT DATED: 02/05/2024
ORDER CMA.No.281 of 2013
DISMISSING THE CMA FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Duggempudi Rami Reddy
Challa Lakshma Reddy
Challa Bella Reddy
Justice Nyapathy Vijay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
