A contempt case alleging wilful disobedience of earlier writ orders. On counsel's submission that the respondents had complied with the underlying order, the court recorded the compliance and closed the contempt case without costs.
Contempt case closed on recording compliance; no costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI^/
FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER ; J
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 866 OF 2024
(Contempt case U/s.10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act1971 to Punish the Respondents here in for willfully violating and disobeying the orders of the High Court dated 27/11/2023 in WP.No.11823 of 2023.)
Between:
D Nagalakshmi Reddy, President, WUA No. 10, S/o.D Venkata Reddy, Aged about 51 years, Occ Contractor, R/o.Korrapalu (V), Velugodu (M), Kurnool District.
...PETITIONER/WRIT PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 to 4.
Counsel for the Petltioner:SRI BATHALA RAMESH
Counsel for the Respondent: M/s S SIVA KUMARI Counsel for the Respondent: M/s S NAGARAJU The Court made the following:
APHC010060772024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3329]
FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 866/2024
Between;
D Nagalakshmi Reddy
...PETITIONER
AND
Sri Shashi Bhushan Kumar las and Others
...CONTEMNOR(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner;
1.BATHALA RAMESH
Counsel for the Contemnor{S);
1.S NAGARAJU
2.S SIVA KUMARI
The Court made the following;
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 866/2024
ORDER:-
This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 27.11.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.11823 of 2023.
- When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 27.11.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.11823 of 2023, and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
- Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt
case shall stand closed.
SD/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTR)^
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
nm
HIGH COURT
DATED:08/11/2024
ORDER
CC.No.866 of 2024
17 FEB 2C?3 m <•
o
Current
★
THE CONTEMPT CASE IS CLOSED
1 provisions across 1 enactments
D Nagalakshmi Reddy
Sri Shashi Bhushan Kumar, IAS
Sri Shamsheer Singh Rawat, IAS
Sri P Reddy Sekhar Reddy
Sri E Thirumaleshwar Reddy
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
