Contempt case alleging wilful disobedience of an earlier writ order. Respondents' counsel furnished instructions showing the bill was paid, indicating compliance. The court recorded the submission, found no further orders necessary, and closed the contempt case with pending miscellaneous petitions also closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
TUESDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 6236 OF 2023
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of CourtsAct 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act. 1971 for their Wilful, deliberate and intentional violation of the orders of this Honourable Court, dated; 30-06-2022 made in WP No.16813 of 2022.
Between:
AND
. ..Contd
-2-
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner :SRI. S PARINEETA
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: S NISCHALA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3: SRI KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI
Counsel for the Respondent No.4:- SRI D.OMKAR
The Court made the following:Order
r
APHC010583132023
rLc'tv' Hrti-TiSi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3329]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 6236/2023
Between:
S Vedhavathi
...PETITIONER
AND
S S Rawat and Others
...CONTEMNOR(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.S PARINEETA
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.S NISCHALA REDDY
2.KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI
4.0MKAR D
The Court made the following:
This contempt case is filed against the respondentsforwillfuldisobedience of the orders dated 30.06.2022 passed by this CourtinW.P.No.16813of2022.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents furnished a copy of written instructions,dated19.03.2024wherein it is stated that the bill was paid on 18.03.2024 In viewofthewritteninstructions
furnished by the learned counsel for the respondents, the orders of this Court are complied with, and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the respondents, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
SD/- T.U.V BHASKARA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
pjr
SECTION OFFICER
To,
n
(RDB)
HIGH COURT
DATE0:02/04/2024
ORDER
ANDH/?^
(?
m
I 0 8 /.UCi W'f Co
o
Current Section y >
CC.No.6236 of 2023
CONTEMPT CASE IS CLOSED
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents wilfully disobeyed the court's orders dated 30.06.2022 in WP No.16813 of 2022, given that the bill was reportedly paid on 18.03.2024.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S Vedhavathi
S S Rawat, Principal Secretary, Finance and Planning Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh
M. Girija Shankar, Commissioner, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department
K. Venkata Ramana Reddy, District Collector (Panchayat Wing), Tirupathi District
Chandra Sekhar Reddy, Executive Engineer, PRI Division, Tirupathi
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
