Contempt case transferred from the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal alleging wilful disobedience of a Tribunal order regarding promotion. Government Pleader submitted compliance was effected via proceedings promoting the petitioner to Sub-Registrar Grade-II for panel year 2020-21, so the court closed the contempt case without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVAT^^^
WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
X C©1)!
o
^ w
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 525 OF 2023
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon the Respondents and punish themforcontemptofthis Hon'ble Tribunal Under Section 23 of Contempt of CourtsAct,1971 r/w. Section 17 of Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 for wilfully disobeying the Orders of this Hon'ble Tribunal passed in OA.No.2690/2018 dated 13.12.2018.
Between:
V. Basaveswara Rao, S/o. Late Lakshmayya Dora, Aged about 50 years. Senior Assistant, O/o. The Deputy Inspector General of Registration and Stamps, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.
...APPLICANT
AND
Smt. T. Saroja, Deputy Inspector General of RegistrationandStamps,Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.
The Contempt Application is dismissed in so far as the Respondent 1 and 2 are concerned as per Orders of the Hon’ble Tribunal inCA138/2019 in O.A. 2690/2018 dt: 10/6/2019.
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. HARINATH REDDY SOMAGUTTA
Counsel for the Respondent: —
The Court made the following ORDER:
APHC010265662023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3459]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 525/2023
Between:
V.Basaveswara Rao ...PETITIONER
AND
T.Saroja
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner:
I.HARINATH REDDY SOMAGUTTA
Counsel for the Respondent:
<br>
1.
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner appeared through Video Conference.
- Learned Government Pleader for Services appearing for the respondents submitted that the order dated 13.12.2018 passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.2690 of 2018 has been complied with by the respondent No.3 vide Proceedings No.E1/602/2020-4 dated 13.08.2021 was promoted to the post of Sub-Registrar Grade-ll for the panel year 2020-21 and no further orders are necessary.
costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
Sd/- E.KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// /l/^ SECTION OFFICER
To,
1. Smt. T. Saroja, Deputy Inspector General of Registration and Stamps,
Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.
2. One CC to SRI. HARINATH REDDY SOMAGUTTA Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CD Copies
Chp
HIGH COURT
DATED:04/09/2024
ORDER
CC(AT).No.525 of 2023
OF
13 DEC 202'»
5 ^
^ . Currem aecuon 9-1)
CLOSING THE CC(AT)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Tribunal's order in O.A.No.2690 of 2018 dated 13.12.2018 had been complied with by the respondents.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
V. Basaveswara Rao
T. Saroja
Sumathi Jagadam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
