Dismissed

Pggv Subba Raju v. Sri Bhartesh Kumar Jain

Andhra Pradesh HC5 Dec 2024CC/4510/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati, disposed of Contempt Case No. 4510 of 2024 by dismissing the petition as withdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioner to file a properly constituted contempt case later. No respondent appeared.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the contempt case was granted; the contempt case was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a properly constituted case.

Pggv Subba Raju Vs Sri Bhartesh Kumar Jain — Contempt of Court | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶2

FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER

¶3

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶8

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4510 OF 2024

¶9

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts^Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon the Contemnor/respondent^hereinand punish him as per law, under sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, for his willful, deliberate violation and disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated: 05-02-2019 in WP (PIL) No.120 of 2016 passed by Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh.

¶10

Between:

¶11

PGGV Subba Raju, S/o Ramakrishna Suryanarayana Raju, Aged about 51 years, Occ; Agriculturalist, Satyawada Grama Panchayat, Undrajavaram Mandal, West Godavari dt.

¶12

...Petitioner

¶13

AND

¶14

Sri Bhartesh Kumar Jain, DRM, S/o, Not known to this petitioner, age Not known to this petitioner presently working as Divisional Manager, South Central Railways, Vijayawada.

¶15

Smt. Madhavi Latha, W/o, Not known to this petitioner Age; Not known to this petitioner Presently working as District Collector, East Godavari District.

¶16

G. Kanaka Raju, S/o, Not known to this petitioner Age; Not known to this petitioner Presently Woking as a Tahsildar, Undrajavaram Mandal, West Godavari District

¶17

...Respondent

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Amancharla Satish Babu

¶19

Counsel for the Respondents: None Appeared

¶20

The Court made the following:

--3

<br>

APHC010241382024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶25

[3508]

¶26

FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶27

PRESENT

¶28

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO

¶29

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶30

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4510/2024

¶31

Between:

¶32

Pggv Subba Raju ...PETITIONER

¶33

AND

¶34

Sri Bhartesh Kumar Jain and Others ...CONTEMNOR(S)

¶35

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶36

1.AMANCHARLA SATISH BABU

¶37

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

¶38

¶39

The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri^{JusticeR.RaghunandanRao)} Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this^Courtto

¶40

withdraw the present Contempt Case with a liberty to file a properly

¶41

constituted Contempt Case.

¶42

Accordingly, this Contempt Case is dismissed as withdrawn^withliberty. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if^any shall stand

¶43

closed.

¶44

SD/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

Sri Bhartesh Kumar Jain, DRM, Divisional Manager, South Central Railways, Vijayawada.

¶49

Smt. Madhavi Latha, District Collector, East Godavari^District.

¶50

Sri G. Kanaka Raju, Tahsildar, Undrajavaram Mandal, West Godavari District

¶51

One CC to Sri. Amancharla Satish Babu, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Three CD Copies

SAM sree

HIGH COURT

DATED:06/12/2024

ORDER

CC.No.451 Oof 2024

0 2 APR 2025
^ . Current Section .

¶58

DISMISSING THIS CONTEMPT CASE AS WITHDRAWN

Pggv Subba Raju v. Sri Bhartesh Kumar Jain

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pggv Subba Raju v. Sri Bhartesh Kumar Jain

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gunnuru Satya Rama Murthy Vs Assistant Commissioner (St)(Int)

M/s.ArikatIa Venkateswarlu, Vs Assistant Commissioner (St)

Arvapalli Srinivas Rao Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Suo Motu Vs a Sri Hari Rao

The Union of Inddia Vs M/s.Pl Raju and Company

The Deputy Director General and Chief Engineer Vs M/s. P.L.Raju and Company