M/S.Satyam Constructions v. Sri S.S.Rawat IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt case closed upon submission by petitioner that respondents had complied with the earlier order of the High Court.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed; no order as to costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI
FRIDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 358 OF 2024
Contempt case U/s.10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act to Punish the Respondents herein for wilfully violating and disobeying the orders of the High Court dated 30/10/2023 in WP No.25187 of 2023
Between:
M/S.SATYAM CONSTRUCTIONS, D.N0.10-1067-Z37C, Jawahar Nagar, Markapur, Prakasam District, Represented by its ManagingPartnerYerva Srinivasa Reddy.
...PETITIONER/PETITIONER
AND
- SRI S.S.RAWAT IAS, Principal Secretary, Department of Finance and Planning, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.
- Sri S. Abuthaleem,, Superintending Engineer, Construction Circle, Ongole, Prakasam District.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents wilfully violated the orders dated 30.10.2023 passed in WP No.25187 of 2023?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/s. Satyam Constructions
- respondent
Sri S.S. Rawat IAS
- respondent
Sri S. Abuthaleem
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Andhra Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/358/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court