This is a contempt case where the petitioner sought cognizance for disobedience of a previous order. The court accepted submissions that the purpose was served and closed the contempt case, dismissing any further proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Original Side)
FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3174 OF 2023
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to take cognizance of the contempt committed by the Contemnors/Respondents herein and punish themwithmaximum imprisonment under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 r/w Article 215 of the Constitution of India for utter disobedience and disregard shown to the Order passed by the Honourable A.P. High Court dated 01.09.2022 passed in W.P. No. 9640 of 2022.
Between:
...Petitioner
AND
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. Srinivasa Rao Narra Counsel for the Respondents: V Dyumani % ^h^^Coiirt made the following: ORDER V i
4
^ '
APHC010278162023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
3357
FRIDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3174 OF 2023
Between:
MUNAGALA RAVI KUMAR
PATTABHI RAMARAO
...PETITIONER(S)
AND ...CONTEMNOR(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRL SRINIVASA RAO NARRA
Counsel for the Respondents: V DYUMANI
The Court made the following:
ORDER: (Per Hon ’ble Sri Justice .U Durga Prasad Rao)
Learned counsel Sri G. Kiran Babu representing SriSrinivasaRaoNarra, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the purpose is served and no further orders are required in the matter and the Contempt Case may be closed.
2
- Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case isclosed.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- K. SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
CHSL, Estt.
■it
SNS
HIGH COURT
DATED: 01/03/2024
ORDER
CC.No.3174 of 2023
-O
■X.
“SAUs 202^ n
pll
5S.O
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE
Munagala Ravi Kumar
Pattabhi Ramarao
U. Durga Prasad Rao
B. V. L. N. Chakravarti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
