In a contempt case, a copyholder informed the High Court that the respondents had complied with prior orders regarding the proceedings below. The Court accepted this submission.
Contempt Case No.2522/2024 closed. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
, r
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATJ^ .1 FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER ^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR Ifc' / PRESENT ^ THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE No.2522 of 2024
Contempt Case filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondents for their willful and deliberate disobedience of the orders passed by this Hon’ble court in WP.No.551 of 2024 dated 29-01-2024.
Between:
T.Nagarathnam, S/o Late T.Amrutham age about 50 years, Occ; Cultivation and Contractor, R/o H,No.5- 56/1, Sankrantipalli, Chittoor District.
...Petitioner
AND
...Respondents
^
Counsel for the Petitioner
^Counsel for the Respondent No.1
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 V’ Counsel for the Respondent No.5
The Court made the following: ORDER
'•V *.
: Sri K V L Narasimha Rao
: GP for Irrigation
: GP for Finance & Planning
[3329]
APHC010199132024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2522/2024
Between;
T.nagarathnam
...PETITIONER
AND
Sri Sashi Bhushan Kumar and Others
...CONTEMNOR(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner;
1.K V L NARASIMHA RAO
Counsel for the Contemnor(S);
1.KM KRISHNA REDDY
The Court made the following;
0 '
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2522/2024
ORDER
This contempt case is filed against the respondentsforwillfuldisobedience of the orders dated 29.01.2024 passed by this CourtinW.P.No.551of2024.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Samuel Sanjay Kumar learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 29.01.2024 passedbythis Court in W.P.No.551 of 2024, and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case isclosed.Noorderas to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
TK
'
HIGH COURT
; DATED;13/09/2024
•>
ORDER
CC.No.2522 of 2024
A
* 2 ? NOV 20?‘i S
^ ^ Current Section
^ ’I L ■
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents had complied with the orders passed in the underlying writ petition thereby defeating the object of the contempt proceedings.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
T.Nagarathnam
Sri Sashi Bhushan Kumar
Sri K.Nayeemulla
Sri Shan Mohan
Sri Murali
Sri Shekavath Singh Rawat
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
