Disposed

R.v.Chinna Muragaiah, v. Sri. J.L. Sharma IAS

Andhra Pradesh HC10 Jan 2024CC/227/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court closed a contempt case upon counsel's submission that the petitioner had been regularized in service via an Executive Officer order dated 28.08.2017, thereby complying with previous court directions.

What did the court decide?

The contempt case was closed with liberty to the petitioner to revive it if there is any violation of the court's orders. Pending miscellaneous petitions are also closed.

R.v.Chinna Muragaiah, Vs Sri. J.L. Sharma IAS — Contempt of Court | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶2

THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO

¶5

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 227 OF 2017

¶6

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that m the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon the respondents and to punish them for willful violation of the orders of this court W.P No.2829 of 2012 dated 12.10.2015.

¶7

Between:

¶8

R.V. Chinna Muragaiah, S/o. R.Veeragaiah, Aged about 52 years, Occ; rosthetic Technician Gr.ll, Artificial Limb Fitting Centre, BIRRD (Trust) Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanam, Tirupathi, Chittoor District.

¶9

...Petitioner

¶10

AND

¶11

Sri J.L. Sharma IAS, Principal Secretary, State of Andhra Pradeshr._ Revenue (Endowments-Ill) Department, Secretariat Buildings Velagapudi, Guntur District.

¶12

Dr. Sri. Sambasiva Rao, IAS, Executive Officer, The Tirumala Tirupathi

¶13

Devasthanam, Tirupathi, Chittoor District.

¶14

Dr. G. Jagadish, Director, BIRRD (T) Hospital, T.T.D. Devasthanam Tirupathi, Chittoor District.

¶15

...Respondents

¶16

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. V. MAHESWAR REDDY

¶17

Counsel for the Respondents: SRI. V. DYUMANI (SC FOR TTD)

¶18

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

HON^BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO

¶20

CONTEMPT CASE No.227 of 2017

¶21

ORDER;

¶22

Sint. V. Dyumani, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the order of this Court has been complied as the petitioner has been regularized in service by proceedings of the Executive Officer dated 28.08.2017 vide Roc.No.TL 2/5034/2012.

¶23

In that view of the matter, this Contempt Case is closed with liberty to the petitioner to revive the same if there has been any violation of the orders of the Court.

¶24

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if

¶25

any, shall stand closed.

¶26

SDI- V DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR

¶27

//TRUE COPY//

¶28

SECTION OFFICER

¶29

To, 1. Sri J.L. Sharma IAS, Principal Secretary, State^{of AndhraPradesh} Revenue (Endowments-Ill) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District.

¶30

Dr. Sri. Sambasiva Rao, IAS, Executive Officer,^TheTirumala Tirupathi Devasthanam, Tirupathi, Chittoor District.

¶31

Dr. G. Jagadish, Director, BIRRD Hospital, T.T.D.^Devasthanam, Tirupathi, Chittoor District.

¶32

One CC to Sri. V Maheswar Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]

¶33

One CC to Sri V.Dyumani (SC for TTD) [OPUC]

¶34

Three CD Copies

Pmg

sree a:i4L

HIGH COURT

DATED:11/01/2024

ORDER CC.No.227 of 2017 8 Copies 2olLfl2if DSL-

¶42

■' <br><2.I 2 0 MAY 202A ^
^ ^ Current Section .
^^£^spatcva55Ls^

¶43

closing THE CONTEMPT CASE

R.v.Chinna Muragaiah, v. Sri. J.L. Sharma IAS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.v.Chinna Muragaiah, v. Sri. J.L. Sharma IAS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P Seenaiah Vs Shashi Bhushan Kumar,I.a.S

Chittor Subramanyam Vs Ragulapalli Manohar (Died)

Kuraku Mary Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Menthi Pentaiah Vs M. Jaya Babu

B Mallikarjuna Reddy Vs R Karikala Valaven

Gundlapalli Venkata Swamy, Vs Prof. a. Krishna Kumari