Contempt case alleging willful disobedience of earlier writ orders. Petitioner's counsel stated the respondents had complied with the order dated in the underlying writ petition, and the court closed the contempt case with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2116 OF 2024
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of CourtsAct 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to direct notices to the Respondents herein and punish them for contempt of courts of the Hon’ble High court for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Hon’ble Court dated 08.12.2023 passed in WP No. 18378 of 2023 by the LordshipsMr.JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act.
Between:
Nakkella Saradha, W/'d. Nakkefla Appalanaidu, Aged about 45 years, Occ Housewife, R/o.1-10, Sivalayam Veedhi, Dattirajeru, Pedamanapu ram Vizianagaram District.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
I
...CONTEMNORS
lA NO: 1 OF 2074
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed i in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the copy of the order dated 08.12.2023 passed in W.P. No. 18378 of 2023 in the interest of justice
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI BATHALA RAMESH
Counsel for the Respondents : M/S S SIVA KUMARI
The Court made the following ORDER :
/■
APHC010176172024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3329]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2116/2024
Between:
Nakkella Saradha
...PETITIONER
AND
Sri Shashi Bhushan Kumar las and Others
...CONTEMNOR(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.BATHALA RAMESH
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.S SIVA KUMARI
The Court made the following:
2
ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 08.12.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.18378 of 2023.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the respondents have complied with the order dated 08.12.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.18378of2023andhence no further orders are required to be passed in the Contempt Case.
Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt
case shall stand closed.
SD/- M.RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
To
HIGH COURT DATED: 25/09/2024
ORDER
CC.No.2116 of 2024
I 2 4 JAN 2325 Ca.
Current Section
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Nakkella Saradha
Sri Shashi Bhushan Kumar, IAS
Sri Shamsheer Singh Rawat, IAS
Sri N Ram Babu
Sri B Sreenivasa Rao
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
