Contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of a writ order dated 06.11.2023. Counsel for the petitioner submitted the respondents had complied with the writ orders, so no further orders were needed; the court recorded the submission and closed the contempt case, with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE No.210 of 2024
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of CourtsAct1971 to punish the Respondents herein for willfully and deliberately violating the order passed by this Hon'ble Court dated 06.11.2023 in W.P.No.16561 of 2023.
Between:
Ganaparthi Sheshaiah, S/o. Chinna Papaiah, Aged 80 years, R/o. West Veerayapalem Village, Kurichedu Mandal, Prakasam District
...Petitioner
AND
9'.
...Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Kolluri Arjun Chowdary
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1, 3 to 5: Smt S SivaKumari
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Sri C Sumon
The Court made the following:
r
Jf:
APHC010021S12024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3329] (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY .THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 210/2024
Between:
Ganaparthi Shehsaiah
...PETITIONER
AND
Sashi Bhushan Kumar and Others
...CONTEMNOR(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner;
1.KOLLUR1 ARJUN CHOWDARY
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.S SIVA KUMARI
2.C SUMON
The Court made the following:
4S
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE N0:210/2024
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed against the respondentsforwillful disobedience of the orders dated 06.11.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.16561 of 2023.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for the respondents.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 06.11.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.16561 of 2023 and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
SD/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
/l/lA. SECTION OFFICER
To
€
TK
I#.
HIGH COURT
DATED:11/09/2024
ORDER
CC.No.210 of 2024
OF
O
g 2 8 OCT 2028
I
★
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ganaparthi Sheshaiah
Sashi Bhushan Kumar
KW Satyanarayana
AS Dinesh Kumar
K. Lakshmi Reddy (Superintendent Engineer)
K. Lakshmi Reddy (Executive Engineer)
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
